2017
09.28

Ray Roberts (Montgomery County Public Defenders Office) is refusing to respond to my requests for documents – he just keeps asking what documents. I tell him. And he just asks what documents again. I requested an explanation for a petition he filed without my knowledge or consent. A petition to withdraw my Appeal to Superior Court – a deliberate act intended to sabotage. Well, further sabotage. The Big Silly Goose. Also, the Public Defender has neglected filings and deadlines and had two earlier appeals dismissed for non-response.

Oops! Well, there goes another chance to address JURISDICTION. Pretend jurisdiction does not provide jurisdiction. SILLY SILLY SILLY.

Focusing on an irrelevant piece of information, he misinforms. Why? How can he get away with that? Well, he and the entire Public Defenders Office know the law.. They understand jurisdiction is a necessity. They KNOW that Judge Carpenter acted without jurisdiction, or authority, when he issued his order appointing the Public Defender. It is why the Public Defender isn’t doing anything for me. They know their assignment is a farce. They cannot abide a defective and void order. THEY WON’T POINT IT OUT EITHER. Why? Well, there were people from the Public Defenders Office in the ex parte event in the judge’s chambers when Judge Carpenter issued the bad order.

THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE HAD PURPORTEDLY JUST BEEN COMPELLED TO REPRESENT ME IN THE JUDGE’S CHAMBERS. Yet, the first action on my behalf was NOT to immediately address the impropriety of the judge’s order and actions. Not to address that I had been in the courtroom during the event. Not to address the presence of Thomas Carluccio at the event. Not to address any of the laws being disregarded and the rights being ignored. They just came out and told me what the judge had done. There was no copy of the Judge’s Order. One would not be filed with the Clerk for a few weeks – a deliberate hurdle to avoid a THIRD notice of appeal. [I filed the NOTICE anyway indicating the failure of the court to provide the written order, which had remained undocketed even on the date when the Notice of Appeal was filed.

Adding insult to injury… Ray Roberts just makes stuff up. There is no necessity for the truth, the facts, or any discussion. He must think I am a fool that would trust a man who was actively undermining my rights, preventing the rule of Law and denying my future.

In response to my note the other day, he replied and somehow answered nothing and provided nothing which was requested. This indifference and neglect has continued for months.

Terrance:

You make a good point. However, we do not represent defendants in federal court. Defendants who want to file in federal court typically file their own pro se federal actions from any state court actions they disagree with and the federal courts appoint federal counsel if they are otherwise eligible for court appointed counsel by completing an in forma pauperis petition and filing it along with the request for relief.

Right now you are litigating whether judge carpenter erred in appointing you a public defender and whether he can find you incompetent without a hearing. Although judge Carpenter’s ruling regarding incompetency was premature, the report , when it finally came back, did find you to be so at that time.

So practically speaking, you are left with the ruling appointing us to represent you without making a determination of your eligibility for a public defender. You do have a federal sixth amendment right to represent yourself.

Your case is still in the pre-trial stage. The state appellate courts have denied you the relief you request because they deem your appeal to be interlocutory suggesting thereby that at this point you have not exhausted all state remedies. You will be receiving a subpoena to appear the next time your case is listed. Let me know what you intend to do. Please come see me to figure out what papers you want. Call me before you come to make sure I will be here.

ray

HIS CONVOLUTED EMAIL ASKS AND ANSWERS DIFFERENT QUESTIONS THAN WERE POSED. I may have to do a sentence by sentence breakdown to address tyhe misinformation in his four paragraphs. He got that much completely wrong.

Today, I replied:

Ray,

(I’ll try to address your email line by line.)

I will get you the full list of documents where the distribution failed to include me.

I will also contact the Federal District Court regarding representation for the neglected issue. From what I have discerned, long established doctrines which require dismissal by the Federal Courts prevent their review of petitions seeking to reverse or overturn a state court order or decision. The door has been left open by the deliberate, intentional documented failure to address the issue of jurisdiction. This was accomplished without judicial review. Unsubstantiated and unsigned Per Curiam orders lack any authentication or verification information. As such, those orders cannot be attributed to the judiciary by default or waiver.

Jurisdiction is a necessity which cannot be assumed, waived or provided retroactively. It is also a responsibility for the Commonwealth to provide the answers to questions regarding jurisdiction AND to assure that the court has jurisdiction. The neglect by EVERYONE to address the lack of jurisdiction doesn’t provide jurisdiction. It’s not funny when your email, letters and documents filed with the court do not include the word “jurisdiction’. (This includes the email to which I am now responding.)

I have made it clear to the District Magistrate court before Judge Duffy and also to Judge Carpenter regarding the problem of representation unencumbered by confidentiality burdens which collaterally can affect me. I have done so in every statement I have filed.

Right now I am litigating to have the court provide evidence of their proper jurisdiction in the matter. The reasons you suggest are secondary issues which can be proven and substantiated, however those actions are also invalid where the court lacks the jurisdiction to act.

The report provided months after the fact is wrong, invalid, unlawful, inadmissable AND lacked purpose. It is an irresponsible character assassination for which the District Attorney has paid over $7000.00. I imagine that if you pay someone that amount of money, they will write what you want. The county use of a professional who is used in death penalty cases was irresponsible, inappropriate and ridiculous. I had informed Dr. O’Brien of the issues which would affect his report at the time we met. I believe I had even provided him the applicable laws which were being violated which would prevent his subsequent report from being admissable in court. You might wish to review the laws concerning competency issues. I suggest that the likely reason for his four (4) month delay in the production of his report was an acknowledgement of the futility of the effort.

With regard to the exhaustion of state efforts, you have failed to suggest what has been missed.

You might wish to re-read the Statement I filed on March 30, 2016 to remind yourself of the relevant issues. You had indicated you would see that it was placed on the court docket, but I see no entry of it.

As far as Interlocutory issues, the appeal was filed by permission of the common [pleas court with leave granted by Judge Carpenter to seek the appeal.

Usually, I have received a Notice of Hearing or Notice for Call of the Trial List.. Has the process changed? These notices had occurred with threats of bench warrants, EVEN while the court lacked jurisdiction during the pendancy of the appeals. This was acknowledged by Judge Carpenter in May 2017.

As you suggest that the case is in pre-trial, just who in the Public Defenders Office is representing me at this time? I have understood your responsibilities to be strictly appeal related. Will that attorney be filing an appearance? Contacting me? Communicating with me? Preparing me for the proceedings?

I appreciate your offer to figure out the papers I need. As I have explained multiple times in multiple ways what I require, you continue to ask the same question.

Priority Issue #1: The explanation or reasoning that you filed the Motion to Withdraw Appeal on May 2, 2016. The information in the document was not accurate. And your action was a direct contradiction to my efforts.

Priority Issue #2: Copies of the letter from the DA waiving a jurisdiction letter in the Supreme Court. Am I supposed to be laughing at this foolishness which disregards jurisdiction at every opportunity.

It would seem logical that if jurisdiction was valid, Judge Carpenter would have ordered the DA to comply with the agreement made on the record in court to provide the elements of jurisdiction, and address the failure to abide the Rules of Criminal Procedure, and respect the rights protected by the US Constitution.

NON-Priority #3: Why would the DA allege incompetence where it could only further serve to prevent prosecution against an incompetent defendant.

I am not incompetent. I am not amused by your disinformation.

Please take a stab at the Priorities above, and I will get you a list of documents. Don’t forget to indicate4 who is currently representing me from the Public Defenders Office.

Thank You,
Terance

2017
09.27

The following is the recent email to Raymond Roberts, Esq.  Ray has refused to provide me ANY documents which he has filed with the court, the Superior Court. Or the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.  He has neglected to file my Statements.  He existed to sabotage my case and my rights – the ones protected by the US Constitution.  Ray has refused to meet with me. Our only face to face encounter occurred when I stopped into his office during a break in the hearings which falsely and maliciously prosecuted Kathleen Kane.  I provided him my statement which clearly indicated the evolution of my case.  He assured me the document would be filed. 

My Statement had been accepted and then subsequently rejected by the Clerk because I was being represented by counsel.  Counsel having been appointed WITHOUT ANY HEARINGS.  No testimony.  No evidence.  No proceeding.  No notice.  No jurisdiction.  NO KIDDING!  That sabotage of my case and my rights is fully documented in the statement. I do not like to make predictions, but their intent was clear and logical. Their adverse actions and negligence failed to advance my case. A constant misrepresentation of issues and actions. A repeated failure to act as indicated in letters and documents. And actions which sought to deliberately delay the matter and prevent any resolution.

… … …

I am still waiting on the documents. I will attempt to obtain the dockets and provide a list for you if that is what you require.

In the meanwhile, as the PA courts have neglected to address the issue of the lack of jurisdiction and failure to follow Law and procedures of the Commonwealth, will you be handling the Appeal to the Federal District Court? or does that get handled by a different appeals lawyer?

As I understand it, the doctrines for dismissal such as Rooker Feldman and Younger would not require dismissal as the State Court has neglected any review of the matter.  The federal court would not be reversing or nullifying a state court order. They would be addressing the courts failure to address the lack of jurisdiction, and the multiple failures by the Central legal staff to prevent judicial review of the issue – a constitutional issue.

Please advise when you might get me the paperwork, as it will be necessary to  demonsrate the effort which sought to address the issue in Pennsylvania.

… … …

State court efforts have been exhausted. Superior Court. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. All without ANY REVIEW BY ANY JUDICIARY.

THE PUBLIC DEFENDER SABOTAGE HAS KEPT ME DESTITUTE, HOMELESS, ISOLATED FROM FAMILY, PREVENTED FROM FRIENDSHIPS FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS WHILE FAILING TO ADDRESS ANY ISSUE.  THERE HAS BEEN ONE DIRECT ATTEMPT ON MY LIFE – BEATEN AND HELD AT KNIFE POINT FOR TWO HOURS WHEN IT WAS DISCOVERED SOMEONE HAD PLACED A PHONE IN MY MOTHERS CAR.  (I returned the phone.). 

AN INDIRECT THREAT WHICH CAUSED GREAT FEAR IS THE ONE DELIVERED BY THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRJCT ATTORNEY.  Five of the most crazed and deluded pages of threats to my life – planning, provisioning and training for that murderous event.  

The effort to conceal my murder by suggesting it a suicide having failed.  AN EPIC FAILURE.  I was awoken, forcibly removed from my home without any warrant, beaten on my front lawn, taken to a hospital for suicide evaluation and treatment.  There was no cause for it.  There was no suicide.  Oh… And there was no treatment.  I was held hostage for days with SEVERELY MENTALLY DISABLED people.  I was petrified.  Terrified.  Placed in harm’s way.   No law.  No rights.  No treatment.  No escape.

This has been my life since 2006.  I have been lucky to survive.  I am in debt to the authentic and sincere folks I have met along the way.

I persevere.  Resilience is my superpower.

Justice is coming.

2017
09.19

A FARCE.

After two years of delays… and having the matter since March… The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Per Curiam Denial. A failure to address the lack of jurisdiction and the necessity of jurisdiction of the common pleas court.

No reason specifed. 

No basis in law. 

No signature of any justice.

No seal. 

No indication of entry on the Docket.

Not even on letterhead.

Not even a postmarked envelope.

NOTHING TO MAKE IT APPEAR AUTHENTIC OR OFFICIAL.  
Perhaps there is nothing which suggests the document is authentic BECAUSE IT IS NOT AUTHENTIC.  The simplest explanation applies.

This is the state of the corruption in Pennsylvania. The judiciary held hostage. Vanilla documents which lack verification where the staff lawyers prevent matters from the review of the court.

This is purportedly a PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT ORDER, yet it  has less verification and authentication data than a grocery store receipt.  

Even a child’s coloring book picture on Grandma’s fridge has a signature. 

 A FARCE is being perpetrate by the staff at the court.  The judiciary is being prevented from any review of the matter.  Yet, everyone in law enforcement is playing along and ignoring that the JUDICIAL BRANCH has been usurped.

2017
09.19

A phone call suggesting an investigation which includes the statement that if they tell anyone about the investigation they will be prosecuted.  

ISOLATION WITHOUT FURTHER DISCUSSION.

CONFIRMING The investigation exists.  So, it is logical that the surveillance they have been hearing about is in place.  Phones, computers, devices.   
If they were to tell anyone [even unintentionally], there is NO DOUBT it would be part of a further conversation, txt or email.

Once threatened, the only choice is to cease any and all communication and contact. This must be done without explanation.  Providing the target of the investigation with a sense of confusion.  The target had told you that this was occurring and you did not want to believe.  Now, you are a part of it.
Surrounding the target with private investigators and confidential Informants has failed to produce a crime where there was no crme.

Isolation from Family and friends has failed to coerce the violent reaction necessary to prosecute.

PLANTING THE IDEA

The constant efforts have failed to result in suicide.  A clear and deliberate interjection of suicide into the timing of events was evident by the arrival of people at your door who had no idea why they were there, or who sent them, or what was going on,… But concerned about suicide.  Raising the issue on the day when the judge’s malicious defectve and void orders would arrive in the mail. Not just once, but many many times.  Judge Calruccio might have been better served by having MCES deliver her orders instead of the mailman.

Judge Carluccio seems very connected to suicide issues.  The latest incident in Bucks County has the Police Chief reading about Judge Carluccio on this web site as part of his actions excusing his officers of wrongdoing.  Waking a man up to save him from a suicide which had been reported by a NON-EXISTENT Facebook friend whose profile indicated it is a farce.  Beating him up and holding him hostage for days.  And then disavowing signing the paperwork at the hearing.

The tactics of the corrupt to make things go away which they do not want to admit.  

The administrative solution puts innocent folks in jail for missing a hearing instead of the crimes alleged.  

The suicide solution ends the effort by the DA who won’t admit to the malicious prosecution by their staff.  

Where suicide is unattainable, the suggestion of suicide can excuse any falure to investigate a murder.

2017
09.15

Those people who stole my house and have threatened to murder me for going to Law Enforcement. 

– the ones who collected the Title Insurance $ 399,606

– the ones involved in the Criminal Action suggesting I am a terrorist because I contacted the Attorney General, the Governor and the Legislature about the fraudulent conveyance which the court refuses to hear…

– they then took out a loan $ 377,500 on my house 
– THEY JUST TOOK OUT ANOTHER LOAN on my house

$ 399,606

   377,500

     50,000

Total   $ 827,106
They admit the deed is fraudulent, yet, they don’t give me my house.

They threaten to murder ME in a 5 page letter, and the District Attorney ignores it.

Now, it would seem they have found the cash to pay for my execution.  Assisted by the local police, the murder will be ruled a suicide.

I suppose they can continue to file for the insurance each time.
What a great scam!

Mortgage Amt:   $50,000.00  

 

  Parcel ID #1:   

  Parcel ID #:   46-00-00467-11-7  

  Municipality:   Montgomery Township   

  Assessed Value:   $228,260.00  

  Address:   110 BANBURY AVE  

  Address 1:    

  City:   NORTH WALES  

  State:   PA Zip:   19454  
  Mortgagor:   

  DAVID R MILLER Person  

  JENNIFER K MILLER Person  

 

  Mortgagee:   

  CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA Other  
Mortgage Amt:   $377,500.00  

 

  Parcel ID #1:   

  Parcel ID #:   46-00-00467-11-7  

  Assessed Value:   $228,260.00  

  Address:   110 BANBURY AVE  

  Address 1:    

  City:   NORTH WALES  

  State:   PA Zip:   19454  

  

  Mortgagor:   

  JENNIFER K MILLER Person  

  DAVID R MILLER Person  

 

  Mortgagee:   

  MERS Other  

  MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC Other  

  ALLIED MORTGAGE GROUP INC Other

2017
09.01

When enough people make false promises words stop meaning anything. Then there are no more answers… only better and better lies.

I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation.  Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… They each make the situation worse.  No one helps.  No one helped.

No one could help while prevented by an improperly enacted and unconstitutional mandate of Confidentiality which directly, or collaterally, undermines the rule of law, every constitutional right and usurps the authority of the entire judiciary in every state and federally.
The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

Justice is coming.

%d bloggers like this: