2017
05.04

STATEMENT OF DEFENDANT ON MAY 4, 2017

The criminal allegations are unfounded. I have not previously and do not intend to waive any rights under Pennsylvania Law, the Pennsylvania Constitution or the Constitution of the United States.

Currently, there is a pending Appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania regarding the ex parte assignment of the Public Defender without proceeding, testimony, or evidence where the Superior Court elected to not review the matter.

With regard to representation by the Public Defender’s Office, the employees of the Public Defender’s office have neglected to respond to any telephone calls, emails, or office visits. Copies of recent emails are attached.

The assignment of the Public Defender was done with the intent to sabotage the rights of the Defendant and to hinder and undermine any defense.

Defendant requests the immediate removal of the Court Appointed Public Defender (who had been previously removed after usurping the case in September 2015).

Where the court has ordered the uninterested Public Defender to represent me, the result has left me unrepresented and not permitted to represent myself.

The Pennsylvania General Assembly has noticed the efforts to ‘chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for redress of grievances’. Further declaring it ‘in the public interest to encourage continued participation in matters of public significance and that this participation should not be chilled through abuse of the judicial process.’

I am being denied protection of the law. My Constitutional rights are being denied and ignored.
I survive. I persevere. I am a Defendant in this matter. I am required to defend.

Terance Healy

This morning the Court immediately  admitted to a lack of jurisdiction.  There will be no further proceedings in Norristown until the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has ruled on the appeal.

Rule 1.6 is falling.   JUSTICE IS COMING.

NOTE TO OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER:
Where was the PUBLIC DEFENDER THIS MORNING??? The person who should have immediately advised the court over a month ago about the lack of jurisdiction while the appeal is pending. Now scheduled twice for no purpose.This is my life, my liberty and my rights. The Public Defender acting as an uninvolved spectator clearly shows a most UNZEALOUS representation.
I take it seriously.
%d bloggers like this: