(Filed in Bucks County PA)

1. The Letter from Kevin Cornwall dated February 12, 2014 indicates the preference of the Defendant to continue to conduct business with First Savings Bank of Perkasie.

2. Defendant has had an ongoing personal and professional relationship with First Savings Bank of Perkasie conducting business and financing construction projects for over 15 years.

3. The document referred to as the ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE dated December 13, 2013 was prepared by Nicole Plank, Esq.

4. The ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE directly refers to “all that certain Mortgage executed and delivered by Defendant dated April 15, 2002 and recorded with the Recorder of Deeds Office of Bucks County, Pennsylvania in Book 2686, Page 1508, to secure the payment of the sum of $400,000…”

5. A MORTGAGE was executed between First Savings Bank of Perkasie and Defendant on April 15, 2002 for the principal sum of $400,000.00 and recorded with the Recorder of Deeds Office of Bucks County, Pennsylvania in Book 2686, Page 1513, 1514, 1515.

6. The MORTGAGE executed on April 15, 2002 includes the following paragraph at 16:

Payment to the Mortgagee by the Mortgagor shall begin as demanded by the Mortgagee and shall be paid on the first day of each month thereafter or as required by the Mortgagee and under all events, payments of interest, unpaid principal and all amounts due under this Mortgage and accompanying Mortgage Note shall be fully paid on of before MAY 1, 2003.

7. As of May 1, 2003, the Mortgage indicated in the ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE dated December 13, 2013 was satisfied – ALL payments of interest, principal, and amounts due on the Mortgage were completed.

8. On December 13, 2013, the ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE prepared by Nicole Plank, Esquire referred to a mortgage which had been satisfied since May 1, 2003 as was required by the original Mortgage document.

9. On December 13, 2013, the ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE prepared by Nicole Plank, Esquire “in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) lawful money, unto it in hand and paid at the time of execution thereof, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, assign, transfer, and set over unto KTMT NEWBURY, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership with an address of 1030 Reed Avenue, Suite 100, Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610” …

KTMT NEWBURY, LP received a satisfied mortgage to which there would be no future revenue or income.

10. The prolonged litigation where no hearings have been held seeks to convert an expired and satisfied mortgage into property ownership through the manipulation of the Court Administration and the Judiciary

11. Compensation for this fraud and concealing the improper initial foreclosure action would be the deed to a property currently valued at $1.2 million.

12. Compensation for also concealing the improper foreclosure action initiated by Jeffrey Trauger of Grim, Beihn and Thatcher on behalf of First Savings Bank of Perkasie.

13. Jeffrey Trauger, and the law offices of Grim Beihn and Thatcher have multiple prior, and current, attorney-client relationships with the involved parties, and county personnel and departments which obstruct and prevent justice and deny the Rule of Law pursuant to a mandate under Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information.

14. Rule 1.6 collaterally affects, undermines and denies the constitutional rights of the Defendant.

15. Rule 1.6 conceals the truth and the facts of the matter from being presented to this Honorable Court where lawyers are required to maintain confidentiality pursuant to this unconstitutional mandate.

16. Where the rights of the Defendant are affected, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania was without constitutional authority pursuant to Article V Section 10(c) to enact Rule 1.6.

WHEREAS, The Defendant respectfully requests this Honorable Court refer the matter to law enforcement for investigation and criminal prosecution by an person unencumbered by obligations of attorney-client privilege and confidentiality which would affect justice and deny the Rule of Law as indicated in Defendant’s MOTION FOR INVESTIGATION (Filed Concurrently and incorporated herein).



“The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”
Dr. Martin Luther King






Justice is coming.


My mother’s phone now indicates in the Caller ID that she is the US GOVERNMENT.  It was a gift to her from my sister at Christmas. Mom hasn’t had a cell phone for years. The intrusions made cell phones a stressful ordeal of failing devices, untimely noises, tracking, etc. Dealing with the billing errors took hours with no contro! – no way to stop the harassment caused by intruders.

ALL DEVICES have been hacked.

Verizon is reporting copyright violations. Watching movies and televised programs on my computer is not a copyright violation to my knowledge. They must hate the repetition though.

All indicators of intrusions which there is no way to stop or prevent.

Rebuilding the computers weekly. Attempting different operating systems. Booting from USB devices. No preventing the intrusions. Attempting to keep up with constant litigation in EVERY level and division of state and federal court using hacked devices which could fail at any moment.

There are far more resources trying to undermine, to interfere, to conduct surveillance, than trying to end a 10 year nightmare.

The minutia of harassment has caused apps to fail and websites to be unavailable, and countless other little things. Annoyances.





This article was so accurate and concise, I tweeted it out before I pilfered the whole thing from @RayBlehar to make sure it didn’t disappear.


Tuesday, December 29

The PA Corruption Network’s Playbook

The similarities between the prosecution of Kathleen Kane and of the PSU 3 reveal the “playbook” of Pennsylvania’s corruption network

Ray Blehar

The cases of current Pennsylvania Attorney General (AG) Kathleen Kane and that of former Penn State University (PSU) officials (i.e., the PSU 3) are connected by a common thread.

A group of the Commonwealth’s attorneys, judges, political operatives, and their media accomplices — hereafter referred to as the “network” — used trumped up charges, purposely misinterpreted laws, and oversold highly dubious evidence to convict these individuals in the court of public opinion.

After examining the timelines and evidence of these cases, it appears that the network has a well defined playbook for taking out its targets and it works like this:

1.  Individuals within the network fear their own heinous acts may be exposed and publicly accuse their opponents of crimes as a means of  deflecting attention away from themselves. 

2.  The network next co-opts individuals close to the target(s) —insiders — to assist in setting up the target(s) to be charged with perjury and other crimes.

3.  After the insiders have sufficiently undermined the targets (using various means of deception), the network’s attorneys and/or judges leak damaging information about the targets to the media

4.  The media arm of the network uses the information in an attempt to compromise the targets or to promote guilt by association in the press.

5.  At the conclusion of this “framing,” that was mislabeled as a criminal investigation, attorneys go public with charging documents that allege crimes based on misinterpretations of the laws and that are chocked full of questionable testimony from unreliable witnesses, completely illogical scenarios, and dubious evidence.  Perjury charges are standard in order to publicly smear the defendants as being dishonest individuals while attempting to pump up the veracity of the Commonwealth’s lousy witnesses (who would be eviscerated at an actual trial).

6.  The media accomplices ignore the illegal application of relevant laws, that the charging documents are illogical, the lousy witnesses, and the highly questionable evidence in order to continue treating the allegations as facts and even go as far as to allege the target committed crimes for which he or she has not been charged.

7.  The public falls for the deception and believes the targets are guilty of everything and are corrupt individuals — whether they have been charged with a crime or not. Citizen activists, public officials, and other groups and individuals — who are beneficiaries of the corrupt network — jump on the media bandwagon to publicly condemn the targets.

8.  Witting and/or unwitting employers recommend the targets be relieved of their duties or actually do so through employment actions — before anything is proven and without conducting a legitimate legal review.  

9.  When legal proceedings in the cases reveal the false and questionable testimony put forth in the charging documents and the dubious evidence used in the case, the network’s media arm ignores the information and continues to slant the reports so the public continues to assume the targets are guilty.

10.  The legal issues from the misapplications of the laws result in appeals to the network’s  judges, who refused to rule on simple matters and keep the trials on permanent hold.  If the cases make it to trial, the targets will be convicted of lesser crimes — that the media will treat like crimes of the century.

The network’s playbook achieves the goal of protecting its corrupt dealings and/or heinous crimes by never legally proving, but publicly scapegoating the targets in a media firestorm that is high in supposition and light on facts.

To wit:  the grand jury and Montgomery County DA Risa Ferman did not find the evidence to charge AG Kane with directly leaking grand grand jury information in the Mondesire case, but you wouldn’t know that if you just read the news headlines

Instead, they charged her with perjury (part of the playbook), lesser crimes, and for orchestrating the leaks, the latter of which Ferman and others know can’t be proven.

Then again, the network’s playbook doesn’t include actually prosecuting the case

In the following weeks, the dubious evidence used in Kane’s case will be exposed, as will the details showing how the network of attorney, judges, and media worked together in an attempt to prevent AG Kathleen Kane from breaking PA’s chain of corruption.



The following statement was provided to the Governor, Thomas Wolf, and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Kathleen Kane, and the Sheriff of Montgomery County
– to request immediate investigation into the corruption involved in this matter.


Additionally, the document was delivered to the Honorable Wendy Demchick-Alloy as an Amicus Statement.  Judge Demchick-Alloy is currently assigned to the Case against Attorney General Kathleen Kane.


The District Attorney acted with complete immunity and autocracy*; further protecting the entire Office of the District Attorney, and other courthouse personnel and departments from prosecution for their fraudulent, illegal and unethical actions.

Actions which deprive a Defendant of the protection of the Rule of Law, deny a Defendant of his constitutionally protected rights, and threaten the personal freedom of the Defendant without opportunity for recourse or resolution WHILE seeking to undermine the authority and independence of the judiciary.


More Details….

And then… Risa Ferman wrote a book about bullying.

Her prior book was on internet safety.  Ferman is the DA who had advised a high school to secretly activate cameras on high schoolers laptops.  No prosecutions for that though.





The Opinions have been filed by the Judge in the two appeals in the Criminal Case. Wow, the Opinions are vacant. There is a simple reason.

The District Attorneys office has not provided ANY information to the court in support of jurisdiction.
The District Attorneys office has ignored the Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The District Attorneys office has denied rights protected by the Pennsylvania Constitution and the US Constitution.
The District Attorneys office has manipulated Court Administration and the Clerk of Courts into actions which prevent due process and have resulted in a somewhat abbreviated (or redacted) docket in the matter.
The District Attorney has failed to address ANY of the issues raised at any time, in any statement, at any proceeding.
The District Attorney office has completely neglected their duties and responsibilities with an absolute and deliberately careless disregard for process, procedure, law and ethics.

Unsigned documents in the case, jpeg artwork, pdf, forgeries, unmailed and undocketed also include an improper letter which attempts to undermine and prevent the appeal through the Superior Court staff. A violation of the Rules of Appellate Procedure and a violation of judicial canons and ethics when the Judges signature is not original, or authenticated. The Judge has been set up…?

The Opinion of the Court can only be based upon the information available to the Judge. The DA has left the judge with NOTHING to include in any Opinion(s). Yes, The Judge has been set up…

The Opinion basically cites two incorrect laws, and ‘forgets’ that the judge granted permission for the Interlocutory Appeal on the record in open court.

Permission to Appeal was immediately requested by the Defendant when the SIGNED ORIGINAL Court Order failed to include the essence of the ‘Agreement’ for the Defendant – a statement of jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter brought before the Court by the District Attorney.

District Attorney and Defendant agreed:
IF the Court would issue a statement addressing proper lawful jurisdiction in the matter,
THEN, the Defendant would stipulate to a review of competency without requiring proceedings to address that issue.
BUT, The District Attorney failed to provide the Court with proper lawful jurisdiction.

With deliberate negligence the District Attorney had failed to follow the Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Further, having been notified by Defendant Statements filed, docketed and included as part or the court record:
– the District Attorney failed to take any actions to address the issues;
– the District Attorney failed to make any effort to remedy their negligence;
– the District Attorney failed to address the improper actions of court administration;
– the District Attorney failed to responsibly maintain the court documents and docket with the Clerk of Courts;
– the District Attorney IGNORED processes, procedures, rules, laws and constitutions with a terrifying disregard for the denial of the protection of the Rule of Law and the constitutionally protected rights of the Defendant.

The District Attorney acted with complete immunity and autocracy*; further protecting the entire Office of the District Attorney, and other courthouse personnel and departments from prosecution for their fraudulent, illegal and unethical actions.

Actions which deprive a Defendant of the protection of the Rule of Law, deny a Defendant of his constitutionally protected rights, and threaten the personal freedom of the Defendant without opportunity for recourse or resolution WHILE seeking to undermine the authority and independence of the judiciary. INJUSTICE OF THAT MAGNITUDE IS TERRORISM.


Any mandate of confidentiality of information which conceals and obstructs those corrupt actions would be repugnant to the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Constitution of the United States. Exactly, the law was improperly enacted without authority by the Judiciary. It is also very unconstitutional. ( But, that’s confidential.)

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of Information – was filed On August 8, 2013 and served to every state Attorney General. The Attorneys General defaulted and the unconstitutional rule fell; however the judiciary was prevented from reviewing the matter. The matter was dismissed by Court Administration. The subsequent appeal received the same mistreatment.

Subsequently, two related Appeals were filed with the Superior Court of Pennsylvania with Notice to the Attorney General that the constitutionality of a law was being challenged. The Appeals were improperly dismissed without review by the Judiciary, or the Attorney General. ‘Secret orders from unidentified courts’ ordered Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, personally, to neglect the responsibilities of the Office of Attorney General.


An injustice had occurred in 2007, which triggered the confidential denial of any protection of the Rule of Law and ignored the constitutional rights of a Defendant with no opportunity for recourse or resolution. In a divorce which annihilated an entire family, the entire Montgomery County judiciary, over the course of years, performed a farce of injustice. Decisions without support in law, and without explanation destroyed the Defendant personally, professionally and financially.

The District Attorney repeatedly failed to address the crimes and injustices committed against the Defendant… WITHOUT EXPLANATION.

The District Attorney interfered to prevent investigations by other law enforcement agencies with the county, state and federally… WITHOUT EXPLANATION.

Defective and void court orders hastily issued without jurisdiction delivered further injustices, nested on prior injustices. Seeking a resolution through the courts, the Defendant was further ignored. The court improperly indicated a lack of jurisdiction for the Courts to act. This was improperly affirmed without judicial review by Superior Court staff.

The fraudulent conveyance of the Defendants residence left him HOMELESS and destitute. The information provided by the Defendant in the litigation seeking to regain his home was further presented by those who stole the home to successfully obtain the title insurance, ($ 400,000.00). They paid off their mortgage in April 2015.

The deed would remain a problem unless the Defendant was ‘gone’.

The Defendant sought the assistance of the Governor to enforce the law, and from the Legislature to revisit laws relating to the jurisdiction for the court.

The District Attorneys office then conspired with those persons who stole the Defendants home to falsely allege the ‘terroristic threats’ (the letter to the Governor & Legislature) which are the subject of this criminal matter which is NOT properly before this court.

The DEED remains a problem while the Defendant is alive. The District Attorney was informed of and IGNORED the efforts by those in the home to provision and train for the Defendant’s execution. Bear in mind, they could go to jail for their fraud and theft. Better to murder the Defendant with the endorsement of the DA.

DEFENDANT: No Law. No Rights. No Kidding.

The corruption of the District Attorneys Office (under the direction AND RESPONSIBILITY* of Risa Ferman and Bruce Castor) will be presented in the criminal case should that be necessary to demonstrate the Defendant’s innocence.

The efforts of the District Attorney to prevent Attorney General Kathleen Kane from investigation and action are no longer AS obfuscated. The conspiracy to maintain the confidentiality is likely well documented in the staff emails within the Attorney General’s Office — between the porngate items.

The extensive and overwhelmingly intrusive investigations of the Defendant which have been ‘sealed’ within county investigating grand juries will be required to present a defense at the criminal hearing.

Both Opinions rely directly on the incorrect law. But, Opinion #2 goes a step beyond – it refers to THE WRONG ORDER entirely.

This is deliberate. Failure to indicate any law – when ANY LAW WHICH deprives a person of a Constitutional Right is NO LAW.

An unstoppable 1983 Abuse of Power claim is coming. Any law which attempts to prevent it… IS NO LAW.

Are you ready for the details?



When Risa Ferman no longer protects the parents who stole my home… Their children may learn about Mission Kids.

Harvesting her endorsed crimes to move the children into her own little MontCo ‘cordero’.

The corruption of Risa Ferman has layers and depths which you cannot even begin to imagine… Or fear.

If anyone thinks Bill Cosby will get a fair trial, they don’t understand Montgomery County corruption. Risa Ferman, the corrupt Prosecutor, joins the bench.

Injustice is no longer invisible. And Ferman’s corruption is going to be on worldwide display.


%d bloggers like this: