2015
11.08

While distracted by the media focus on the Pennsylvania Constitution phrase which has never before been used to successfully remove an ELECTED OFFICIAL like the Attorney General from office, people may be interested in another phrase

Check out Article III Section 13
“A member who has a personal or private interest in any measure or bill proposed or pending before the General Assembly shall disclose the fact to the House of which he is a member, and shall not vote thereon.”

LOGIC would apply to remove ANYONE with a law degree (a personal and or private interest) from voting on ANY MEASURE which would serve to provide any personal or private financial gain at the present time OR in the future.

For example, … a plumber would not be permitted to vote on plumbing code or related measures as they would have “a personal or private interest” in ANY action which could result in a financial gain for plumbers.

AS ANY AND EVERY LAW provides the opportunity for lawyers to profit personally or privately from related legal issues and litigation (any measure or bill proposed or pending), ALL LAWYERS WOULD BE PREVENTED FROM VOTING ON ANY AND EVERY LAW pursuant to the PA Constitution.

Also, ANY measure which attempts to permit the lawyers in the General Assembly to ignore Article III Section 13 of the PA Constitution would be unconstitutional, and improperly enacted where lawyer-legislators failed to remove themselves from the vote on the measure.

The obligation is placed directly on the member of the General Assembly to self identify, AND NOT VOTE THEREON.  Failure to remove themselves from the vote would be an unconstitutional act in DIRECT violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution… and a reasonable cause for impeachment and removal from office.

As the legislative process and each vote is publicly recorded information, any failure by the lawyers in the General Assembly to remove themselves from voting could affect the validity of the subsequent law.

Consider the efforts of the leadership in the General Assembly to suppress and IGNORE the worst kept secret in Pennsylvania – an unconstitutional Confidentiality imposed upon lawyers by the Supreme Court which the court itself cannot address because of their improper mandate of confidentiality.

Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Ferman’s case against Attorney General Kathleen Kane has been based largely upon what is NOT being presented.  The docket of the case suddenly includes over fifty documents which have been sealed by the DA and the Superior Court BEFORE the items were ever entered into the docket – and backdated as far back as April 2015.

IT IS TIME for action by Governor Wolf pursuant to Article III Section 12. Convene the General Assembly to suspend the improper and unconstitutional Rule 1.6
mandate of confidentiality which has concealed the undermining of the Rule of Law, and the rights purported to be protected by the PA and US Constitutions.   (Per Article I Section 12, the Legislature has the ONLY authority to suspend laws.)

The ONLY profession which has profited from INJUSTICE is the legal profession.

The legal profession remained silent during scandals such as Kids For Cash, Sandusky, and a Foreclosure Crisis based on fraudulent and forged robosigned documents, etc… The nondisclosure by the entire legal profession while the rights of Americans and the Rule of Law were aggressively ignored.  Their silence which has undermined an entire Judiciary held hostage by their own improperly enacted and unconstitutional Confidentiality rules for lawyers and the legal profession.

The improperly enacted and unconstitutional Model Rules of Professional Conduct advanced at the behest of the American Bar Association has permitted the members of it’s various bar associations to profit from the deliberate injustice caused by an unethical, immoral and unconstitutional mandate of silence.

There will be no necessity for the lawyers in the General Assembly to convene when called by the Governor to address the CONFIDENTIAL corruption of the Judicial system, the lawyers can’t vote on it anyway.

YOU MIGHT ASK,…

WHAT ARE THE LAWYERS DOING IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IF THE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTION PREVENTS THEM FROM VOTING TO ENACT LAWS?

WHY HAS THE PA BAR ASSOCIATION FORMED A PAC TO FUND LOBBYING EFFORTS ON LAWYER ISSUES?

image

No Comment.

Add Your Comment

%d bloggers like this: