2015
09.23

I HAVE REVIEWED THE PAPERWORK WHICH WAS RELEASED.

PA Supreme Court Order Suspending Kathleen Kane’s Law License (pdf)

THERE ARE SEVERAL INDICATORS WHICH SUGGEST THAT RULE 1.6 MAY BE SILENTLY CONCEALING A FRAUD.  Lapses in logic. I am not a lawyer, SO I may point them out.

image

KATHLEEN KANE IS HAVING HER LAW LICENSE SUSPENDED YET SHE GETS TO KEEP HER JOB ACCORDING TO THE ‘ORDER’.

THERE IS NO JUDGE’S SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.  

THERE ARE NO SIGNATURES ON THE ORDER AT ALL.
– No list of any affirming or dissenting Justices by name.

One might consider that the PER CURIAM order could be a farce drafted by lawyers whose improper actions are concealed by Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

Per Curiam Orders are most often issued without judicial review.  They are for housekeeping issues, scheduling issues, and standardized responses which are intended to address simple issues before the matter is presented to the judiciary for review.

A reasonable person might expect the suspension of the law license of the State Attorney General would merit judicial review and signatures.

A reasonable person might consider that where this Per Curiam Order further modifies THE COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY ACT which was passed by an elected Legislature and signed by an elected Governor, the Judicial branch is overreaching and usurping the authority of the Legislative and Executive branches.

A reasonable person might notice that THERE IS NO REAL DIRECT EVIDENCE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OR INVOLVEMENT.Perhaps it is NOT the judiciary that is overreaching their authority.

Have the lawyers working within the Judicial system exposed their ability to usurp the Judicial branch while silencing the Executive and Legislative? Rule 1.6 would mandate nondisclosure by lawyers, and permit fraud in the furtherance to conceal their corruption.

Claims in the media report it was a unanimous Supreme Court of Pennsylvania who issued the order. The documents provided do not support that suggestion.

The documents clearly indicate that a group of lawyers on the Disciplinary Board ignored the facts and based their request for suspension on implications, inferences and broad speculation while aware that there has been no judicial review of the case (a hearing) or any conviction.

Rule 1.6 would conceal the fraud. Rule 1.6 would prevent lawyers from inquiring or exposing the fraud. Intimidation would also apply to any lawyers who would be exposing the corruption within the very system which disciplines and controls those in the legal profession… and their disciplinary meetings are handled CONFIDENTIALLY.

THAT IS ONLY PAGE ONE! THERE WERE OVER 250 PAGES PROVIDED.

Oddly, there have been no statements issued from Justices on the PA Supreme Court regarding “their” decision.

Where the Per Curiam Order has all of the attributes of a forgery, a fraud and a farce… Yet, pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality, Lawyers cannot point that out.  Kathleen Kane could expose it, BUT ONLY WHEN SHE IS PRESENTING HER DEFENSE TO THE COURT. 

I suspect that if the Senate removes Kathleen Kane from her elected office before her trial, the Montgomery County District Attorney might suggest that Kane has paid the price for her alleged crimes and drop the charges.  THUS, PREVENTING KATHLEEN KANE FROM ANY DEFENSE, ANY DISCLOSURE, ANY RECOURSE.

As an attorney, Kathleen Kane must maintain Rule 1.6 confidentiality unless defending herself… even where the nondisclosure relates to the unconstitutional Confidentiality law. You may recall that there were two secret orders from unidentified courts which CONFIDENTIALLY ordered Kathleen Kane, the individual, to neglect the responsibilities of her elected office. Those responsibilities include actions in cases where constitutional issues arise.

In Healy v Healy and Healy v Miller, the Superior Court has not provided documents in the matter, AND KATHLEEN KANE HAD NEGLECTED HER RESPONSIBILTIES AS ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT EXPLANATION.

It was stated early on by the Attorney General that the corruption was larger than anticipated, that it went deeper, and it was fighting back.

NOT ABOVE DIRTY TRICKS: Former Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor’s New Year’s Manifesto. Commissioner Bruce Castor “schooled in how to really hurt you” and “to [screw] others”

Once affected by unconstitutional Rule 1.6, the victim has no protection of the law; all constitutionally protected rights are ignored and denied; and there is no opportunity for recourse or restoration of rights or protection of law.  Ever.

Seriously.  No escape ever. 

No Comment.

Add Your Comment

%d bloggers like this: