What if every citizen of Ferguson, MO could sue the one person responsible?

What if every PERSON who has experienced INJUSTICE – their rights denied, no protection of the law – could sue the one person responsible?

What if every police officer who suffered a loss of personal integrity to conceal a grievous ‘error’ could sue one person who permitted the situation?

What if every victim of Injustice who has been ignored could sue the person who allowed the situation to go unresolved FOREVER?

What if an ENTIRE NATION experienced and witnessed INJUSTICE, and with a cause for relief could demonstrate the damages and attribute it to ONE person?

President, NO. Judge, NO. Congressman, NO. Politician, NO. Prosecutor, NO. Police, NO.




THE EFFORT WHICH SET HER UP… serves to expose those responsible.

    “Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover.”
    “you don’t go to war with a person who spends his/her professional life figuring how to [screw] others…”

Any litigation could never be successful – no rights, no law, no justice – all evidence and facts ignored according to the law. One law.
bigstock-Young-handsome-businessman-in-45198436STOP RIGHT THERE…

To those people waving the parchment and suggesting “THEY CAN’T DO THAT.”

“This constitution, shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.” U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2.

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs.Madison, 1803.)

“The Constitution is just a god damned piece of paper.” (George H.W. Bush)

Those who “wave” the Constitution often fail to recognize that asserting the Constitution with it’s full power requires a person the have proper standing, damages, a cause for relief, and a party who make a change.

Short’n’sweet: You have to fight your own battle. It’s illegal for a lawyer to act.

Injustice and corruption prevailed… as ‘one law’ was enacted in each state. Discretely… from 1984 (New Jersey) to 2009 (Maine). Only the biggest stories made the news, yet, lacked any explanation… while also lacking any prosecution.

bushchaseOn August 8, 2013, Terance Healy, Todd Krautheim on behalf of the United States v. Kathleen Kane, Pennsylvania Attorney General and the attorneys general of the United States approached the federal court with a Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 – ONE LAW improperly enacted in Pennsylvania, and every state. With standing, damages and a cause for relief which could be addressed by the attorneys general, the matter was dismissed, appeal denied, reconsideration refused because of fraudulent filings, submitted late and without any factual basis, on behalf of Pennsylvania Attorney General, Kathleen Kane AFTER DEFAULT by every state.

The ‘one law’ being challenged permits attorneys to commit fraud to prevent exposure, and to prevent rectifying. The documents in the cases were forged and fraudulent. Lawyers must abide by the law until it was unconstitutional, unless they had ‘standing’ themselves.

Since September 9, 2013, EVERY AMERICAN INJUSTICE creates a liability for Kathleen Kane without defense or any immunity available.

By March 2014, the cases from the federal challenge were in Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Where paperwork may have been previously disregarded, something changed. The necessity of the Constitutional Challenge became more evident. A review of the case would present damages – fraud committed by someone in the Attorney General’s office in her name. unknown-comic Secret order from unidentified Court #1.

Other appeals proceeding through Superior Court challenged the constitutionality of the ‘one law’. Secret order from unidentified Court #2.

Court records and files had not been sent to Superior Court from Montgomery County. The Superior Court dismissed – (fraud by court staff lawyers) – unsigned decisions without basis in law. Demonstrating the unconstitutional effect of the law which was being challenged.

Grand Jury ‘leaks’ target Kathleen Kane for a violation based on speculation.

Grand Jury Investigation widely discussed seeks to prosecute Kathleen Kane for violating a grand jury where she did not participate and had no obligation of secrecy.

Grand Juries can be used to secure investigations and documents. Any investigation by the Attorney General into the cases in Superior Court may have encountered ‘unavailable documents’ and unavailable warrants for ‘surveillance’ which would have been signed by the Superior Court. While the appellant had never been prosecuted, all evidence of investigations INTO him while he filed complaints about crimes and intrusions which were ignored could have been ignored. BUT, NOT BY AN ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH STANDING AND DAMAGES.

About the secret orders from unidentified courts, Kathleen Kane has indicated…
– “We are not investigating. I cannot investigate.”
kathleenkane– “I am being stopped from performing my duties as Attorney General.”
– “My office is being stopped from certain investigations.”
– “And we are being stopped even from telling why.”
– “My hands are tied and this will be frustrating for you because it is just as frustrating for me.”
– “My hands are tied because there are court orders which don’t allow us to say certain things which I believe the public needs to know.”
– “I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”
– “I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”
– “But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

Mid-December 2014, Kane made the following statement:
“something that’s been on my mind. But I’m very confident that the truth will come out and that justice will prevail.”

Then, she lawyered up. Among her team is a lawyer with experience in financial impact of litigation and asset protection. It is logical to expect Kane to protect her families assets, and her husband’s business, from the liabilities created in her name by fraud which she cannot expose or prosecute because it requires non-disclosure pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

PaDomaKane understands constitutional challenges, and the law. Where she refused to enforce or defend a law which was unconstitutionally prohibiting same sex marriage in Pennsylvania, she was supported by the federal courts decisions and the subsequent retreat by Pennsylvania in the matter.

Rule 1.6 placed a duty on the Kane which had to be followed. Once she had standing to challenge the Rule herself, personally and as Attorney General, that duty to the law could be excused as unconstitutional.

IMAGINE a ‘secret order from unidentified courts” arrives requiring all the confidentiality and non-disclosure of the unconstitutional law, written into an order which must be followed while being appealed..

Secret Orders issued to Kathleen Kane, the person, preventing her from performing the duties of the Office of the Attorney General.

Secret orders NOT issued to the Attorney General, whose duties are defined in law constructed, written and approved by the Legislature and signed by the Governor.

The improper order creates a liability for her failure to perform the duties of the office to which she was elected. This could subject her to impeachment. Justified, but caused by the unidentified court.

The liability for actions subsequent to the Constitutional Challenge’s improper dismissal starts on service in some jurisdictions, and has not limit in others. Where her ‘action’ resulted in the dismissal of the DEFAULT by every state attorney general, every injustice committed and concealed by Rule 1.6 non-disclosure and every fraud in the furtherance committed and concealed causes her personal liability to grow.

KathleenKane-ThankYouCardAn UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW IMPROPERLY ENACTED IN EVERY STATE is causing Kathleen Kane to be deprived of the very thing which she championed for others.

Her marriage.

“If the statute is unconstitutional it must fall. When the statute falls the defendant officers are left “standing naked, as individuals clothed with no power emanating from the state, and thus viewed and considered alone as individuals assuming to act under the guise of law where no law exists; . . . ”

Where Rule 1.6 directs the Confidentiality of Information for lawyers and legal professionals, the two secret orders from unidentified courts which require non-disclosure and confidentiality suggest the court’s acknowledgement of the unconstitutional law and order

Where there is no duty or obligation to abide by an unconstitutional law, the secret orders issued to Kathleen Kane recreate the full force and effect of the unconstitutional confidentiality with specificity.

Fortified with standing to challenge the unconstitutional law personally, it has required a Grand Jury Conspiracy to be created to prevent exposure.

Consider this… Healy v Healy is a divorce. This is not a criminal matter. Only in the Family Courts can a person who has committed no crime lose everything, INCLUDING their constitutional rights and any protections of the law. I am trying to survive their corruption and injustice, but they resent my failure to commit suicide. The efforts to undermine and prevent every possible resource for emotional support and health is twisted. That their efforts were unlawful and well documented, is a damning indictment of the Montgomery County Judiciary. Safe from litigation to hold them responsible where a person without rights and no protection of the law could never prevail in court. The effort to assert my rights continues… and the documents get longer…

Yet, the seems to be an extreme amount of effort to ignore and prevent, and TO SILENCE Attorney General Kathleen Kane. Secret orders protecting confidentiality and mandating non-disclosure. Must be hiding somethin big… 30 year conspiracy, sedition, rape of public trust… CHECK!


WHO IS PREVENTING JUSTICE? What is their motivation? How are they getting away with it?

The author of Rule 1.6, the American Bar Association.

Their motivation is to conceal their undermining of the judiciary which caused a loss of judicial independence to make decisions based on the rule of law.

31f17abThey get away with it, because the the law affects lawyers who are controlled by the Rules of professional Conduct enforced by the judiciary whom they ‘own’.

Controlled locally by District Attorneys who panic when a governor questions why prisoners on death row have not been executed? The answer to that question is something the DA’s may not answer pursuant to Rule 1.6. Following the law, the ONLY situation which REQUIRES disclosure is where someone is to be killed. Seems they know how to identify the victims of injustice under Rule 1.6 – undeniably unconstitutional and concealing corruption and injustice since 1984.

Preventing information – confidentiality – ignoring without explanation… is the kind of disrespect you might have for a god-damned piece of paper when ONE LAW enacted which required lawyers to IGNORE could even be used to ignore the US Constitution…. maybe even leverage a decision to give your boy a job.

A demonstration of how undermined the judiciary have become, … and an education system which may not have left children behind, but failed to tell them how to ‘swing’ the full force and effect of the US Constitution.


No Comment.

Add Your Comment

%d bloggers like this: