The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has made it illegal to remove an unconstitutional law which they enacted (without authority).

The Pennsylvania Legislature has the exclusive constitutional authority to SUSPEND a law.
PA Constitution, Article I Section 12

Lawyers and judges are permitted and excused to say or do anything which will prevent the situation from being rectified. All fraud in the furtherance of their effort is excused and held confidential… UNLESS, they plan to kill someone.

Fraud permitted to conceal injustice which is endorsed, accepted and unexplained while concealed pursuant to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information…

… DENIES the Rule of Law…

… DENIES rights secured by the US Constitution…

… and DEMONSTRATES (whether indicated or not), that non-disclosure pursuant to Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional. It is no law. A nullity…

… AFFECTING substantive rights, the state Supreme Court LACKED AUTHORITY under the state constitution to enact into ‘law’…

    “…, if such rules are consistent with this Constitution and neither abridge, enlarge nor modify the substantive rights of any litigant,…” PA Constitution Article V Section 10(c)


The judiciary also LACKS AUTHORITY to issue ‘secret orders from unidentified courts’ which seek to continue the effect of an unconstitutional law upon a person…

    SERIOUSLY, changing the hiding place does not make something constitutional, even where designed to avoid challenge by preventing standing by the person improperly ordered.
    Where non-disclosure excuses non-disclosure, it is evidence of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality.

… by REQUIRING A PERSON elected to the Office of Attorney General to neglect the duties and responsibilities of the office which are defined by properly constructed law written and approved by the Legislature, then signed by the Governor…

… by requiring the failure to investigate and enforce the law and prosecute crimes…

… while demanding unlawful and unconstitutional actions and participation in conspiracy…

… with FULL PERSONAL LIABILITY for their actions without any DEFENSE or IMMUNITY where those actions DENY AND PREVENT THE RIGHTS which are secured and protected FOR EVERY PERSON by the Constitution of the United States.

When hidden within the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.6 is unconstitutional.

When hidden in ‘secret orders from unidentified courts’ confidentiality and non-disclosure is unconstitutional.

Any effort to prevent, obstruct or deny, the US Constitution is treason.

Will it be necessary for me to seek relief from every person who has failed to preserve protect and defend the state Constitution and the Constitution of the United States; even where they have taken a public oath to do so?

Besides authorizing official capacity suits against state and local officials for structural injunctive relief, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 authorizes claims against those officials in their individual capacity for compensatory and punitive damages.

By its terms, Section 1983 imposes liability without defense on state and local officials who, acting under color of law in their individual capacity, deprive persons of rights created by the Constitution and federal law.

The public interest requires decisions and actions to enforce laws for the protection of the public. Public officials, whether governors, mayors or police, legislators or judges, who fail to make decisions when they are needed or who do not act to implement decisions when they are made do not fully and faithfully perform the duties of their offices.

“Equal Protection of the Laws” – FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state,
WHO, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States,
SHALL have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

    Where the government of the United States has become undone, the NON-lawyers have the opportunity and obligation to act to restore the US Constitution and the government by informing the state legislatures of the Rule 1.6 quagmire.

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Unconstitutional Rule 1.6 non-disclosure and confidentiality is repugnant. It can conceal no lack of authority, nor avoid the full effect of law, where presented or suggested in support (declared or non-disclosed) of actions which are ignorant of the Constitution.

Rule 1.6 broadly excused actions which are ignorant to the US Constitution by lawyers. EVERYONE who alleged an accusation of an UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACT learned of non-disclosure and confidentiality and could proceed no further.

Undeniably unconstitutional – a law which made it mandatory to conceal that it was not lawful. Enacted in every state. The Public Trust has been violated by those responsible for the abomination which they disguised as ETHICS – while lacking any ethical, moral or lawful principles.

    “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” – Fifth Amendment

Without Rule 1.6, will The American Bar Association take “the Fifth”?
Does leaked speculation from grand juries now indict government officials improperly ordered to silence? Where preventing any investigation of injustice involving the wife of the special prosecutor?
Where her actions remove absolute judicial immunity for an entire county bench?

Where every effort which extended the injustice of Healy v Healy sought to avoid resolution/litigation by involving as many people in the effort to conceal the corruption. Instead, their law abiding actions demonstrated the unconstitutional law which had undermined them all … and has been used to conceal corruption and injustice throughout the US.

THE US CONSTITUTION WILL NOT BE IGNORED… and certainly not by an unconstitutional improperly enacted state law… A judiciary undermined, usurped, and held hostage must be liberated and their independence and integrity restored in the name of Justice where EVERY PERSON MATTERS.

We the People, in order to maintain a more perfect union, re-establish Justice to ensure domestic tranquility.

“The US Constitution Rebooted.”

The Obama Legacy could be restoring the US Constitution and the Judiciary. An Executive Order instructing the State Legislatures could keep Pennsylvania’s difficult reboot from occurring in every state.


No Comment.

Add Your Comment

%d bloggers like this: