state_oppression_1Is Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane permitted to speak?
– About those two secret orders?
– About the two secret courts which issued them?
– About the investigation she is not permitted to conduct?
– About the case she is not permitted to participate in?
– About the actual subject of the grand jury investigation?
– About the corruption mentioned on CNN?

Why does it seem the actions of Prosecutors and District Attorneys are behind the effort to silence the Attorney General. AND… is also the source of the information and attacks against the Attorney General.

After reading the New Years Eve Manifesto from former DA Bruce Castor about his ‘skills’ – abuse of power, corruption, strategic actions against perceived enemies. The effort to silence AG Kathleen Kane could be described exactly as Castor boasts:

The-First-Rule-is-fight-club-8474492-600-759“Career lawmen think strategically. They don’t go for the immediate gratification of a personal attack, instead preferring to set the board up just right and striking at the precise moment where the object of the attack cannot recover.”

Could the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association (PDAA) be the center of the effort to undermine the Attorney General using strategic misinformation and disinformation methods knowing that Kathleen Kane cannot respond – either because of those SECRET COURT ORDERS or because of Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information. The District Attorneys have IGNORED the cases where Rule 1.6 Injustice has been triggered.

Has Bruce Castor – Former President of PDAA – violated the first rule of ‘Fight Club’?

Rule 1.6 has been demonstrated to be unconstitutional – with complaints and evidence of the crimes and constitutional violations sent to two District Attorneys, the Attorney General of PA, and the US Attorney among others. Where the timing of events corresponds, AG Kane may have been secretly ordered to ignore the Rule 1.6 issue.

Why have the Philadelphia and Bucks County District Attorneys also neglected to acknowledge, respond or investigate? Could it be that they are involved in seeking those secret court orders which prevent Attorney General Kane from addressing the unconstitutional law – a responsibility of the Attorney General defined by law and procedure. The Attorney General has failed to address the matter in the Superior Court. (The Superior Court has concealed a document filed in the appeal and the court’s response to that document. A Request for a copy of those documents has been IGNORED.)

Where the Judicial Branch has ordered the Executive Branch to ignore the laws of the Legislative branch, the judiciary has overthrown the entire state government in a broad violation of the Separation of Powers pursuant to and concealed by Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of Information.

mob2If you are going to deny a person of their constitutional rights and prevent any effort to address the issue of the unconstitutional law which has undermined his rights and denied any protection of the law since 2007, THAT BEST BE KEPT SECRET.

The secret orders are not valid because they seek to deny a person of their constitutional rights. Secretly issuing an order to restrict the efforts of a collateral authority, an attorney general, is ultimately improper and unconstitutional as it orders an official to violate their oath of office and the responsibilities of their office while permitting the US Constitution and the state Constitution to be ignored.

Rule 1.6 is again ‘at play’ indirectly undermining the rights of a person and demonstrating it’s unconstitutional effect in the immediate event. An unconstitutional law is no law, a nullity, as if it never existed. However, until it is unconstitutional it is considered law. Where the Attorney General must follow the law, the corrupt perversion of Rule 1.6 becomes clear as it undermines the authority of the Attorney General.

Rule 1.6 has a built-in self defense which interferes and prevents it from being declared “unconstitutional”.

“What is right is not always the same as what is legal.” – Edward Snowden

The workaround: Non-lawyers in the Pennsylvania Legislature can act to suspend Rule 1.6 according to the PA Constitution Article I Section 12. Once suspended, the lawyers and legal professionals may address the issue and begin to restore their reputation and the integrity of the courts.

Americans will not be passive when they learn of the summary denial of constitutional rights because of an improperly enacted unconstitutional law which requires lawyers to be silent while incredible injustice occurs and the state and federal judiciary is undermined.

It seems very clear that the matter documented on this web site – A TERRORISTIC DIVORCE – is related to every issue, everyone and everything which has been published. Bruce Castor was the District Attorney when the case began in 2007. Risa Ferman has ignored a litany of crimes which violated the LAW and several court orders, AND additionally prevented investigations brought to her detectives by other County Officials.

9a956abfbf486306aecc6f33f113470cYet, it is what the media is not mentioning which I find intriguing…
– those two secret orders?
– the two secret courts which issued them?
– the investigation she is not permitted to conduct?
– the case she is not permitted to participate in?
– the actual subject of the grand jury investigation?
– the corruption mentioned on CNN?

When Kathleen Kane decides to speak, and is permitted to speak about those SECRET court orders, the prevented investigation and obstruction of the AG responsibilities, and is permitted to address the ACTUAL grand jury presentment and correct misinformation and disinformation…


On CNN in November, Kane indicated:
“I knew that I was walking into public corruption. Which again is why I ran.”

“But I will tell you this. Even I am shocked at the level of public corruption.”

“I am shocked at how deep it goes.
I am shocked at how powerful it is.
I have never seen anything like this. It’s breathtaking.
It has been described by the people familiar with what is happening as shameful.”

“But, if this can be done to me as Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer of the 5th largest state in the country, I am sickened to think what can and may be done to regular, good people who don’t have the resources that I have to challenge it.”

If my experience with the extreme corruption within Montgomery County is any indication… those remarks from AG Kane indicate she recognizes what has occurred and understands my litigation and the necessity of the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

The United States is on the threshold of a new age of JUSTICE… and end to the pervasive INJUSTICE.

I believe that Kathleen Kane recognizes her responsibility and comprehends her unique opportunity to make that happen.


No Comment.

Add Your Comment

%d bloggers like this: