2014
06.24

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane neglected to include the following disclaimer in the Sandusky Report. This DISCLAIMER would have eliminated the questions raised by the report.

D I S C L A I M E R
The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General’s office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers.

The Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandate confidentiality of client information where the information
– would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
– would reveal the prosecutorial misconduct of their own office,
– would expose individual liability,
– would adversely affect their client.

AS SUCH…

The Report to the Attorney General in the Investigation of Gerald Sandusky may not legally present
– anything which exposes a negative impact of the judiciary
– anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Tom Corbett
– anything which exposes misconduct of Governor Tom Corbett
– anything which exposes misconduct of Acting Attorney General William H. Ryan, Jr
– anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Linda Kelly
– anything which exposes misconduct of Attorney General Kathleen Kane
– anything which exposes misconduct of the Attorney General’s office
– anything which exposes misconduct of Frank Fina
– anything which exposes misconduct the Commonwealth
– anything which exposes misconduct of any state agency
– anything which exposes misconduct, participation or acts of obstruction by any of the above in their individual capacity, or as a conspiracy
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 3, 2009
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on May 2, 2009
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 9, 2012
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on April 18, 2012
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on June 16, 2012
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on July 4, 2012
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to modify the Rules of Professional Conduct on November 21, 2013
– anything relating to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania acting to create, modify or fine tune any “LAW” regarding the Confidentiality of Email concealed within the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Further, acting as Attorney General, I have contracted the creation of the report to Widener University law professor and former federal prosecutor H. Geoffrey Moulton.

( You might say “I am his client.” and that the Rules of Professional Conduct mandate his confidentiality for my protection. )

Because, I AM. and IT DOES.

The Report additionally will not contain any information regarding the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 – CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION which was filed in federal court on August 8, 2013 (by two men who do not have to maintain confidentiality so we do it for them) seeking to restore the constitutional rights of litigants while restoring the integrity and reputation of the judiciary and the legal profession and to deliver to the legislature the ability to perform the duties of their position to responsibly manage the law.

The Challenge now approaches the United States Supreme Court and the United States Congress where every level of the state and federal judiciary has ignored the clear evidence of the Courts’ denial of constitutional rights and demonstrated their own actions to prevent resolution of the matter which was served to fifty-six states attorneys general – all of whom defaulted on the matter… YET, THE COURT IGNORED THEIR DELIBERATE DEFAULT.

P.S.

Yes, I shot my mouth off during my campaign for Attorney General of Pennsylvania,
AND
I promised to investigate Attorney General Tom Corbett’s mishandling of the Sandusky case,
AND
I believed Corbett to be stalling the case so it would not impact his run for Governor,
AND
I was elected to the position of Attorney General,
AND
I have an obligation to the People of The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,

BUT, as Attorney General, these corrupt and incompetent horses asses are NOW my clients, my boss, and my staff… The RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT mandate confidentiality.

With regard to the non-participation of the Pennsylvania State Police in the preparation and assembly of this report…. Did someone tell the PSP that we wouldn’t publish anything they might have to say because of our confidentiality mandate? Their participation would have potentially require a great deal of redaction and editing.

The Pennsylvania State Police do NOT have a Confidentiality Mandate. If they were to issue a report, I imagine it would be different.

1.6 Confidentiality of Information – While the Model Rule 1.6(a) duty of confidentiality is closely related to the attorney-client privilege, it is broader in scope than the attorney-client privilege, “which is a rule of evidence,” or “the work product immunity which is a rule of procedure.”

Rule 1.6 causes a mandated confidentiality of information regarding injustice and judicial corruption.

This was demonstrated in Luzerne County where Kids For Cash was IGNORED by every judge, district attorney, prosecutor and lawyer… until Judge Ann Lokuta violated the law and called the FBI to report Ciavarella et al. Ann Lokuta was disciplined and removed from the bench for her violations of Rule 1.6.

The Foreclosure Crisis nationwide was caused similarly by an ACT OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT resulting in the loss of constitutional rights and the loss of homes to fraudulent actions filed by lawyers (and judges) MANDATED to maintain confidentiality.

THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS LET THIS HAPPEN TO MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.
THEY. LET. IT. HAPPEN.

Rule 1.6 mandates that an Attorney General ignore judicial corruption and injustice
– without regard for the number of children improperly incarcerated by a judge,
– without regard for the number of homes foreclosed upon using fraudulent documents,
– without regard for basic constitutional, civil and human rights,
– without regard for the denial of equal protection of the law,
– without regard for the law,
– without regard for an oath of office,
– without regard for ethics or morality, and
– without mercy for the victims overwhelmed, destitute and pushed to their limits who commit suicide.

Rule 1.6 DELIBERATELY PREVENTS LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL…

2014
06.24

badjudge

The tag line of this new television sitcom is UPHOLDING THE RULES BY DAY. BREAKING THEM BY NIGHT.

There is a major flaw in that line. The courts are NOT upholding any rules. The American judicial system is broken. There is nothing funny about the injustice in America.

The American courts are NOT upholding the rules, laws, procedures or constitutions. The arrogance and disdain of the judges who don’t even pretend to follow law, ethics, morals, etc… The judges need not be concerned… their injustice will be ignored on appeal and escalation. The judges can ‘make shit up’ and violate every procedure to prevent their crime from being exposed.

The essence of the judiciary is their integrity and reputation.
Judicial integrity is mandated.
Judicial integrity may not be corrupted or adversely affected.
That is LAW.
A law the judges wrote for themselves.
The People want and expect a judiciary with integrity.
You do not obtain integrity
– by ignoring the judiciary’s complete lack of integrity.
– by law that the integrity of the courts may not be impeached.
– by enacting laws which prevent exposure or prosecution of judicial corruption
– by creative interpretation of the US Constitution,
– by making people call judges ‘YOUR HONOR’ when truthfully they lack honor and have no shame in demonstrating it.

The judiciary is fully self-aware and informed YET continues to ignore the constitutional mandate of the judicial branch. A court majority is impervious to arguments about its proper behavior.

The American courts are in a tailspin in every state… yet, no one is doing anything except watching and pointing it out.

KIDS FOR CASH: A judge denied constitutionally protected rights of children, sent the kids to jail in a kickback scheme, destroyed their young lives, crushed their families, while the lawyers and district attorney and public defenders and attorneys general DID NOTHING. Further, THEY FAILED TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY WERE UNABLE TO DO ANYTHING. THIS WENT ON FOR YEARS AND YEARS AFFECTING THOUSANDS.

THE REASON: A law which mandates CONFIDENTIALITY also mandated confidentiality of the application of the law. The Rule is called CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. Same rule. Same number 1.6 Same title. EVERY STATE. Rolled out over 20 years, starting in the mid-80’s.

Once a litigant was the victim of judicial injustice, their basic rights were lost. They did NOT have equal protection under the law. There was no liberty and justice. There is no escaping further injustice.

FORECLOSURES: MILLIONS of people discovered the loss of their rights through unlawful and fraudulent foreclosure actions. They still are losing their homes every day. Once the injustice starts, the courts just ruin you without mercy. Suicide is the more humane option when facing this type of terroristic attack on every aspect of your life through fraudulent litigation and deliberate injustice.

No one has been prosecuted in the Foreclosure Crisis. WHY? Confidentiality of Information requires the corruption and injustice delivered by the courts to be suppressed and ignored without explanation.

The robo-signed and fake deeds presented to the court; the false business names utilized by lawyers who refused to identify their client (a plaintiff without standing), THE FRAUD UPON THE COURT which lead to the loss of family homes nationwide by the millions was NOT addressed by any court. The law was ignored in the courts and on appeal. The Courts failure to address their injustice caused the cases to grow exponentially. Any lawyer who wanted to steal ANY house only needed to file with the courts. It did not even matter if the victim had no mortgage. The judiciary became so complacent that they ignored facts, crimes, misleading financial information, fraud, etc…

When the judges recognized that their integrity was suffering because of their injustice, the Legislatures created a mandatory mediation process to prevent the cases from getting before a court. The lawyers could now terrorize people and steal homes without involving the court and hurting the integrity of the court.

The court did not respect the victim, the victim’s rights or the law. The court did not respect itself demonstrating a failure of ethics, morality and any humanity or empathy. The court addressed their integrity issue – while taking no action which could increase their integrity. The courts removed themselves allowing the foreclosures to continue through outside mediation where facts were still a non-essential element.

The courts permitted the lawyers to cause financial havoc by foreclosure fraud in the courtroom, outside the courtroom, while denying equal protection of the law, and obstructing and preventing prosecution of the crime because of a mandate to protect the integrity of the courts. No one ever explained it. There is a reason no one was prosecuted for the fraud. The MANDATE for CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION had been silently concealing injustice and corruption since the mid-80’s. The number of victims had grown to the point where the tactic of isolation by poverty was no longer effective. The mandate of silence continued to protect the integrity of a judiciary which failed the American people. Judicial arrogance without shame. The only believer in justice was the victim who had no choice but to hope and not to despair.

The judiciary violated the public trust, ignored the US Constitution and state constitutions and MANDATED the silent participation of every judge, every lawyer, every court.

The lawyers in the US Congress and the state legislatures must remain silent, too.
The non-lawyers speak out about the injustices and nothing ever gets fixed.
The non-Lawyers informed about the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 are instructed by the lawyers to SHUT UP. They further suggest that the revelation of the judiciary’s sedition would undermine American society. The continued abuse of judicial authority undermines the American government every day.

Continuing the crime and injustice of the judiciary undermines American society and the human and civil rights of every American. It was NOT always this way… there used to be the proverbial ‘good ole boys’ network that ignored the occasional corruption in a discretionary manner.

RULE 1.6 IS A MANDATE ENACTED BY THE COURTS
WHICH IS AGGRESSIVELY ENFORCED BY THE COURTS
WHICH REQUIRES THE PARTICIPATION OF EVERY COURT
AND EVERY LEVEL OF LAW ENFORCEMENT – Lawyers, District Attorneys, Attorneys General

The court addressed their responsibility for the shift from a discretionary participation to a MANDATORY participation in their injustice? Further injustice and denial of rights. Financial ruin. Destroying their victim because their victim survives and MUST return to the court for justice. There can be no denying the deliberate motivation and intent of the judiciary when the actions of the court defy law, procedure or explanation.

The court cannot tell you why THEY are mistreating you and addressing your survival of their injustice with contempt because THE COURT MANDATED IT TO BE KEPT CONFIDENTIAL. Your lawyer is also obligated NOT to inform you. Your lawyer may NOT take any action to address the courts denial of your constitutional rights without facing disciplinary action. If you sue your lawyer, the courts will cover for the lawyer who was covering for the court. The courts have no integrity – to console themselves they destroy other people’s integrity. Broken, right?

This deliberate and intentional law designed to corrupt, usurp and undermine the american government through the judicial branch is undeniable. The malice and terror inflicted on the victims of judicial injustice is unspeakable – because the courts won’t listen, and they have mandated everyone in law enforcement to silence. Any lawyer who attempts to reveal the issue is swiftly disciplined, suspended or disbarred… AND, they take Rule 1.6 to the grave and beyond.

For proof that the courts are acting with malice aforethought and deliberate intent to undermine the US Constitution, the actions of the courts to diminish the authority of the only Law Enforcement Authority who is NOT required to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION. The participation of the county District Attorney, the usurper of the constitutional authority of the sheriff, misleads, distracts obstructs and prevents the sheriff from enforcing the law. Case law is application/misapplication of law by the court. CASE LAW IS NOT LAW.

The necessity of misleading the sheriffs out of their constitutional authority.

There is no doubt that we live today under an altered constitutional regime, where the rules are no longer supplied by a written document but by courts defining the powers of government ad hoc, through their own case law.

This profound change from our previous order of government is hidden by political and judicial rhetoric that give honor to and even cites the written constitution. It is further obscured by the fact that this new regime was not ratified by amendment or constitutional convention.

Where a real constitutional right of one person is being violated with the unanimous apathy of the rest of the United States, that right must be vindicated. No amount or length of majority inertia can legitimate what the courts are doing to that right.

JUSTICE IS COMING. EVERY. PERSON. MATTERS

2014
06.24

The constitution is very clear and concise about the authority of the sheriff.

The problem arose when the Rules of Professional Conduct were enacted into law by the court, without the legislature and or the governor.

Efffective 4-1-88, there was no lawful way to prosecute injustice or judicial misconduct in Pennsylvania. The rules made it unlawful for a District Attorney or Attorney General to do so. This was intentional and deliberate – protecting the integrity of the court by mandating a conspiracy of confidentiality and ignoring their crimes.

It was made very clear in KIDS FOR CASH – when no one stopped the judge and everyone knew what he was doing was wrong. The immorality and lack of ethics demonstrated by judges and lawyers was shameful.

A fly in the ointment. The sheriff had constitutional authority to prosecute AND was not required to follow the Rules of Professional Conduct. SO… the judges and lawyers and courts diminished the authority of the sheriffs through litigation and case law. Basically removing all of the sheriffs constitutional power, BUT not doing it in the Constitution where people would notice.

The sheriff is the chief law enforcement officer in the county. NOT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY who usurped the power.

from the Pennsylvania Sheriffs Association
The Sheriff is empowered to appoint deputies, and the deputies have the same powers as the Sheriff when performing their duties. the Sheriff is also invested with the power of the “posse comitatus” (the power or force of the county), which is the power to call upon “the entire population of the county above the age of fifteen, which the Sheriff may summon to his assistance in certain cases, to aid him in keeping the peace, and in pursuing and arresting felons.”

Today, the Sheriff, like all law enforcement officers, is faced with unprecedented challenges. However, if history is a guide, there is little question that the Office of Sheriff will adapt, grow, and change to meet the needs of modern law enforcement. The Office of Sheriff is an integral part of the American law enforcement system; a descendant of an ancient and honorable tradition.

Office of Sheriff in Pennsylvania The office of the sheriff was recognized in the earliest reports of English law. Throughout history, the sheriff was recognized as the chief law enforcement officer in his shire or county. This status remains today, unless it has been changed by statutory law. The sheriff is also given authority to appoint deputies which are necessary in order to properly transact the business of his office. The requirement for training of deputy sheriffs is specifically provided by stature, i.e., the Deputy Sheriffs’ Education and Training Act (1984 P.L. 3 No.2). However, based upon a Pennsylvania Supreme Court case, a deputy sheriff needs training similar to police officers to enable a deputy sheriff to enforce specific laws of Pennsylvania.

A review of statutory law provides little guidance in addressing the issue of the duties, power, and authority of a sheriff. THE PA CONSTITUTION refers to the Sheriff as the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in the County.

Case law provides that, although a sheriff’s primary responsibilities are to the courts, the sheriff retains all arrest powers he/she had at common investigation of crime.

CASE LAW is NOT law. It is how the courts have applied the law. It can be proven that the courts acted to diminish the authority of the sheriff to avoid their own arrest for sedition, undermining the state and federal governments, abusing the power of their office under color of law, in a conspiracy where they have denied and prevented the constitutional rights of the people.

More importantly, since the sheriff retains all arrest powers he/she had at common law, he/she has the authority to enforce the criminal laws as well as the vehicle laws of Pennsylvania.

The Rules of Professional Conduct once made law included a major problem… when victimized by an injustice, the target has no escape, no equal protection under the law, and no recourse. Returning to the courts to address the court’s injustice is an exercise in futility. Unfortunately, the victim must exhaust the state courts and be further victimized until being able to file in the federal courts… where the same failure of ethics and integrity requires appeal and escalation. It is understandable that these matters usually end in homelessness, prison or suicide. It was designed to be corrupt by the American Bar Association.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 is a case which is doing just that. The sacrifice of judicial integrity is embarrassing to the judicial branch of government in the state and the federal levels. They just spew back stupidity by making false, irrelevant and unsubstantiated and unsupported statements. And the next level of accountability does the same.

scumbagjudgeThe issue is fully documented on the court record. Common Pleas Court. Superior Court. PA Supreme Court. Eastern District Court. Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Even a cursory review of the Challenge and the supporting cases demonstrate the problem AND THE DELIBERATE FAILURE OF THE COURTS TO ADDRESS THE INJUSTICE WITHIN THE JUDICIARY.

The victim has no choice but to persevere and continue to pursue the case in higher courts… with each court shamefully acting by embarrassing itself in their opinions and briefs. The courts clearly demonstrate their lack of any ethics, morals or integrity and their complete disdain for the US Constitution.

The Challenge is now heading before the US Supreme Court and the US Congress. The ABA undermined the judiciary and usurped the power of the legislatures in every state and federally. JUSTICE IS COMING

%d bloggers like this: