2013
10.19

Filed on October 18, 2013 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO ATTORNEY GENERAL KANE’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
(PDF version)

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO ATTORNEY GENERAL KANE’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

(PDF Version)

REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS UNDER RULE 36
(PDF version)

Certificate of Service (PDF version)


The Federal Docket


300px-US_Eastern_Pennsylvania_District_Court

There seems to be NUMEROUS issues relating to the Federal Court Docket for Case# 13-4614.

Not only where items have been docketed improperly in paragraph form, but where they have been entered incorrectly resulting in necessary documents being concealed from view.

There is also the issue of the entire case docket being concealed from view in the PACER system.

The Federal Docket should read as follows:

08/08/2013 1 COMPLAINT – CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE filed by Terance Healy, Todd M. Krautheim;
and
Filing Fee $400 receipt number PPE0086455;
and
Civil Cover Sheet;
and
Case Management Track Designation Form;
08/08/2013 SUMMONS ISSUED TO GREG ABBOTT, American Samoa Attorney General, LUIS SÁNCHEZ BETANCES, JOSEPH R. “BEAU” BIDEN, III, PAM BONDI, JON BRUNING, JAMES D. “BUDDY” CALDWELL, MARTHA COAKLEY, JACK CONWAY, ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., ROY COOPER, KEN CUCCINELLI, MIKE DEWINE, BOB FERGUSON, JOSEPH A. FOSTER, TIM FOX, VINCENT FRAZER, DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, MICHAEL GERAGHTY, KAMALA HARRIS, JOHN JAY HOFFMAN, JIM HOOD, TOM HORNE, MARTY J. JACKLEY, GEORGE JEPSEN, KATHLEEN KANE, PETER KILMARTIN, GARY KING, CHRIS KOSTER, DAVID LOUIE, LISA MADIGAN, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, DUSTIN MCDANIEL, PETER K. MICHAEL, TOM MILLER, JANET T. MILLS, PATRICK MORRISEY, IRVIN NATHAN, SAM OLENS, SCOTT PRUITT, LENNY RAPADAS, ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, JOEY PATRICK SAN NICOLAS, DEREK SCHMIDT, ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, BILL SCHUETTE, WILLIAM H. SORRELL, WAYNE STENEHJEM, LUTHER STRANGE, JOHN SUTHERS, JOHN SWALLOW, LORI SWANSON, J.B. VAN HOLLEN, LAWRENCE WASDEN, ALAN WILSON, GREG ZOELLER.
Forwarded to Pro Se on 8/9/13
08/08/2013 Special Case Management Track
09/06/2013 2 PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KANE’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE AND FOR WAIVER OF PRO HAC VICE REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-PENNSYLVANIA DEFENDANTS;
and
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KANE’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF THE RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE AND WAIVER OF PRO HAC VICE REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-PENNSYLVANIA DEFENDANTS;
and
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
Modified on 9/9/2013
09/06/2013 3 NOTICE of request for ECF filing;
and
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR INITIAL FILING.
Entered on 9/9/2013
09/09/2013 4 Letter dated 9/6/2013 from Terance Healy, Todd M. Krautheim re: Request for ECF Filing.
Entered on 09/09/2013
09/11/2013 5 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KANE’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE AND FOR WAIVER OF PRO HAC VICE REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-PENNSYLVANIA DEFENDANTS;
and
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
Entered 09/11/2013
09/16/2013 6 ORDER
“AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2013, upon consideration of Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane’s request for extension of the responsive pleading deadline and waiver of the pro hac vice requirements for non-Pennsylvania defendants, and plaintiffs’ response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the request is GRANTED. The non-Pennsylvania defendants shall not be required to file a responsive pleading to plaintiff’s pro se complaint until thirty days after the Court rules on Attorney General Kathleen Kanes’s notion to dismiss the complaint. It is further ORDERED that if the non-Pennsylvania defendants are required to file a responsive pleading, the pro hac vice requirements for the non-Pennsylvania defendants are waived. Plaintiffs do not oppose this waiver.” Signed by Honorable Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr on 09/16/2013.
Entered on 09/17/2013
09/27/2013 7 ATTORNEY GENERAL KANE’s MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT;
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL KANE’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT;
and
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .
Entered on 09/27/2013
10/18/2013 8 PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO ATTORNEY GENERAL KANE’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT;
and
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO ATTORNEY GENERAL KANE’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT;
and
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS UNDER RULE 36;
and
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE;
and
MOTION FOR ECF FILING
and
AFFIDAVIT FOR ENTRY OF CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS PREVIOUSLY FILED AND DOCKETED on September 6, 2013 as CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.

No Comment.

Add Your Comment

%d bloggers like this: