The LIE of not having jurisdiction is intended to make people go away. Judges act without jurisdiction. ALOT. When they do, there is no way to address their lack of jurisdiction, because Rule 1.6 prevents exposure of the ‘misconduct’ of the judge, or the lawyer who perverted the legal proceedings. Eighteen judges of the Montgomery County Judiciary sacrificed their integrity for the fraud committed by one of their own. Their abuse of power under color of law is astounding and can only be described as terror.

Rule 1.6 prevents anyone from helping… BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT PERMITTED TO EXPOSE THE ‘MISCONDUCTS’.

They then tell you they do not have jurisdiction. THIS IS A LIE. They are not allowed to tell you there has been a misconduct which prevents justice in your matter. So, they pretend you are completely ignorant about jurisdiction.

JurisdictionThe lack of jurisdiction is a LIE.

The Attorney General in each state is the highest law enforcement officer in the state. They have jurisdiction to combat crimes, corruption, and every level of wrongdoing and injustice.

BUT, as lawyers the Attorneys General are MANDATED to ignore anything which exposes misconduct of lawyers and the judiciary.

RULE 1.6 trumps jurisdiction.
RULE 1.6 trumps all other law.
RULE 1.6 trumps justice.
RULE 1.6 trumps ethics and morality.
RULE 1.6 ignores the Constitution of the United States.
RULE 1.6 targets its victims with complete loss of protection of the law, absolute injustice, denial of any course of action to escape, and prevents anyone from doing anything to help. The victims of injustice have all been denied the true explanation for why they became disenfranchised.

Attorney General Tom Corbett had jurisdiction.
Attorney General Linda Kelly had jurisdiction.
Attorney General Kathleen Kane has jurisdiction to prosecute corrupt judges, but she lacks the lawful ability to act. Rule 1.6 made it impossible for them to fully accomplish their responsibilities as Attorney General.

Think of any scandal where a judge was prosecuted. Ask yourself who prosecuted the matter? Federal prosecutors. The State did not act. Now consider that the State Attorneys General have been compelled by Rule 1.6 to ignore the crimes of the judiciary and the membership of the bar.

What Attorneys General do not have is the legal ability to address corruption in the legal system, or make any change which would provide that lawful ability.

It might seem they are too ashamed to tell you, EXCEPT THAT THEY CANNOT LAWFULLY TELL YOU because RULE 1.6 prevents them from telling you the truth.

That Rule 1.6 results in the complete loss of constitutional rights to the victims of unaddressable misconduct. It further prevents any lawyer or judge taking any action to correct the MASSIVE FAILURE in this law.

The only way to make the change is for someone with no legal background to come along, to have been terrorized for years by injustice, to find and recognize the failure in the LAW, and to address the law in the only way possible and lawful.

Fix it yourself… so that’s what was done.

It is necessary that he learn, study, review research and then serve the resolution back to those who were made lawfully incapable of taking any action to help him.

The only way out is through a victim. I am that victim. I have survived their terror. Through it all, i was able to persevere. And I have served the resolution which permits the return to justice to the Attorneys General of the entire United States.

I have filed in Federal Court a Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Civil Action 13-4614.


So when Robert Mulle, Chief Deputy Attorney General – Legal Review Section writes on August 20, 2013 that
“Mr. Healy has contacted this office in the past and has explained his situation. Mr Healy has been advised on many occasions that this office does not have jurisdiction to intervene on his behalf and that is still the position of this office.”


The Office does have jurisdiction. He is just not lawfully permitted to tell the truth, or to take any action. Robert Mulle is shamed and humiliated into a lie in order to continue unconstitutional injustice and terror of a victim who begged for help.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6 will return integrity to the judicial system and to the Attorney Generals as well. Robert Mulle can live with his past lies and shame.


I have a dream… to escape the nightmare of injustice MANDATED by Rule 1.6

“The strictest law sometimes becomes the severest injustice.” Benjamin Franklin

“Injustice is censured because the censures are afraid of suffering, and not from any fear which they have of doing injustice.” Plato


“True patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.” Clarence Darrow


MLK“Let us consider a more concrete example of just and unjust laws.

An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. This is difference made legal.

By the same token, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow and that it is willing to follow itself. This is sameness made legal.” – Martin Luther King Jr.

%d bloggers like this: