2013
07.24

Once again, paperwork has been delivered… Matka Boska, there’s always more paperwork.

Issue: Where are the Certificates of Service?

– Angst & Angst lawyers did not deliver the petitions to the Defendant
– Assured a lack of jurisdiction for the judge
– Lack of jurisdiction = Abuse of power under color of law


Issue: Where are the Scheduling Orders for the Hearings?

– No hearings are scheduled
– Court has no intention of holding hearings
– Prevents preparation by the Defendant


Issue: Secretly Cancelled Hearings

– Cancel hearings by email/praecipe to Court Administration WITH NO NOTICE TO THE PARTIES
– When caught (ON THE RECORD), Reschedule
– Cancel by email/praecipe AGAIN WITH NO NOTICE TO PARTIES
– Keep one hearing on schedule, if Defendant appears, prepared for all, cancel and call security.
– Keep one hearing on schedule, if Defendant does NOT appear, default DISMISS ALL PETITIONS. Failed Attempt.
– Ponder why Plaintiff did not appear even though they wrote to the court asking if the date was cancelled


Issue: The NEW Illegal Local Rule permits this to be done by email

– The certificate on the County Site corrupts security on local computers
– Grants access to all devices disks and peripherals
– The County site indicates the litigants who have permitted their computers to be corrupted
– Anyone can hack into the litigants computers to prevent email from delivery
– Attempts by the Court to create ‘no shows’ have been so clearly deliberate, now the Court can do so by email failure and blame their victim for not knowing about the hearing when their system clearly enables the action. DELIBERATE CORRUPTION BY DESIGN! ANY IT PROFESSIONAL COULD SEE THIS FAILURE TO THE PROCESS. NORRISTOWN WANTS TO CLEAR THEIR DOCKETS AND HAS THE CRIMINAL TOOLS TO DO SO. Ask Gabriele Drexler about email security.


Issue: Petitions have been withdrawn after Judge issues order granting EVERYTHING.


Issue: Extortion in the Court.


ISSUE: Pending Appeal of the Divorce Decree/Equitable Distribution

– Order May 9, 2011
– Reconsideration filed by Defendant June 6, 2011
– Reconsideration filed by Defendant June 9, 2011 as EMERGENCY
– NOT an Emergency on June 10, 2011 Schedule in due course
– June 23, 2011 – Reconsideration scheduled for June 14, 2011
– July 14, 2011 – Response filed by Plaintiff
– July 14, 2011 – Response filed by Plaintiff (Dup1icate)
– July 14, 2011 – Transcript Judge Carluccio admits to not having Junsdiction
– July 14, 2011 – Transcript Judge Cariuccio commits extrinsic fraud

The issues are procedural errors and extrinsic fraud.

Defective Order CANNOT be Final Order.

Period for filing an Appeal is 5 years.

– August 15, 2011 — Appeal filed by Defendant
– August 15, 2011 – Petition to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Carluccio)
– August 15, 2011 — Transcript Requests
– August 22, 2011 – Order for Concise Statement of Errors Complained of On Appeal
– September 15, 2011 – Concise Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal filed by Defendant
– September 19, 2011 – RESUBMISSION Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
– October 19, 2011 – Opinion by Judge Carluccio
(Neglects to address ANY relevant facts— suggests the Appeal is not filed timely and uses incorrect references for tolling the statute of limitations)
– The Prothonotary fails to forward the Appeal to the Superior Court Of Pennsylvania.

The Appeal is Pending

The Petition to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is Pending

The Resubmitted Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is Pending
– KBR from Court Administration contacts the Defendant by phone and indicates she has been told to return the IFP to the Defendant
– There is no instruction from the Judge
– There is no request for additional information by the Judge
– There is no explanation from the Judge
– The documents have been filed properly
– The Judge has not ruled on the petition(s)
– Defendant suggests KBR return the IFP(s) to Judge Carluccio for action/instructions/scheduling

The Pending Appeal should stay any actions related to the order being appealed.

The Pending Appeal should stay any enforcement actions related to the order being appealed.


ISSUE: The Order of September 23,2011 Failure to conduct heariugs/permit testimony

The Protracted hearing on September 23,2011 was ordered on July 18, 2011

“A Protracted Hearing on Plaintiffs counter Petition for Sanctions filed July 14, 2011 is scheduled for Fnday September 23, 2011 fi-om 10 30 a: in until noon”

1.5 Hours were scheduled for the hearing.

NOW READ HOW THOSE 1.5 Hours get loaded up to the point where issues could not possibly be addressed. The judge had no intention of HEARING anything. The plan was to ignore and terrorize… All filings by defendant were necessary. Unfortunately, they were ALL ignored by the judge who demonstrated her fraud, corruption, conspiracy to deny justice and complete denial of civil, human and property rights. Judge Carolyn Carluccio decided to push her victim to suicide. And I wouldn’t oblige. This INFURIATED her… and her stupidity and malice was documented, on the record and completely out of control.

The docket shows that there was no Certificate of Service for the Plaintiff Counter Petition for Sanctions filed 7/14/2011


On July 21, 2011 Defendant filed
PETITION REQUESTING AN IMMEDIATE STAY/RESCHEDULING REGARDING TUE ORDER OF JULY 18, 2011 AS THE INCOMPLETE WRITTEN ORDER PLACES THE DEFENDANT IN JEOPARDY

The Court had issued a verbal order into the record.
The transcript would not be available for weeks.
The Defendant believed be would be subjected to arrest for following the verbal order as the available printed documents indicated he must vacate the property.

Police were called when Defendant was photographing the Plaintiff’s dissipation of assets August 2011 and September 2011. Just photographing my possessions being thrown away resulted in police being called. I was not on the property. I remained across the street, so police coulsd not say I had not vacated the property and arrest me.

On August 17, 2011, the Short List was scheduled for September 20, 2011


On August 15, 2011 Defendant filed (concurrent with the filing of a NOTICE OF APPEAL)
Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
On August 15, 2011, Defendant filed an Appeal of the Defective Order of May 9, 2011 (Divorce Decree & Equitable Distribution)


On August 19, 2011 Defendant filed
Petition Requesting the Scheduling of Outstanding Petitions

This Petition recapped the number of petitions which remained unheard by the Court

Since the August 12, 2010 discovery of a Secret Ex Parte, Undocketed and Undistributed Order issued by Judge Rhonda Daniele, Petitions submitted by the Defendant were no longer heard.


On August 30, 2011 Defendant filed
Petition Requesting Distribution/Docketing of Ex Parte Court Order
While seeking Police intervention of the Plaintiffs dissipation of Assets (which was denied), Defendant learned that Montgomery Township Police were requested by the Montgomery County Deputies to assist in ensuring that the Defendant had vacated the Property on June 9,2011

Montgomery County Sheriff Eileen Behr has CONFIRMED her deputies being dispatched to the house, BUT she has neglected to provide any information as to WHY, or at who’s request they were dispatched. Sheriff Behr was surprised during our face to face conversation when the system also had no explanation for the deputies being dispatched. Though I had set her expectations when she asked for the information to be printed and delivered to her.


On August 31, 2011 Defendant filed
Petition Requesting Documents and Injunction Blocking Sale of the Home Until Appeal by The Superior Court of Pennsytvania Has Been Decided

Plaintiff was failing to provide any information regarding the Sale of the Home — a violation of Power Of Attorney
The Real estate Agent would not Provide any information
The verbal order of July 18, 2011 had ordered removal of the Defendant’s property by the closing date of the home
Defendant was not disclosing that date
The Appeal had been filed and no action had been taken with regard to supersedeas or stays while the appeal is pending


On September 1, 2011 Defendant filed (AS EMERGENCY)
Petition Requesting Documents and Injunction Blocking SaIe of the Honie Until Appeal by The Supenor Court of Pennsylvania Bas Been Decided


On September 1, 2011 Defendant filed
Petition Regard Ing the Seheduling of Outstanding Petitions


On September 2, 2011 Defendant filed
Petition for the Recusal of Judge Carolyn Carluccio


On September 6, 2011, on the faxed Request of the Plaintiff, Judge Carluccio IMMEDIATELY continued the hearing scheduled for September 20, 2011 to September 23, 2011 to accommodate the Plaintiff’s inability to appear.
– On August 17,2011 The DEFENDANT PETIflON REQUESTING AN IMMEDIATE STAY had been seheduled for September 20, 2011
– Closing Date for the house had been set on JuIy 24, 2011 and signed/accepted by Plaintiff on July 27, 2011
– The Closing date was scheduled for September 20, 2011
– Plaintiff intentionally prevented the Defendant from knowing the closing date A violation of Power of Attomey Law
– Real Rstate Agent, Chris Grucella had dehberately and intentionally prevented the Defendant from knowing the closing date
– Keller Wilhiams Real Estate has deliberately and intentionally prevented the Defendant from knowing the closing date
– Their conspiracy to commit the fraudulent sale of the home is undeniable
– It is not unreasonable to suggest that Plaintiff had rnformed Angst & Angst of her reason for being “unable to attend” on September 20,2011
– Angst & Angst were deliberately and intentionally creating an appearance of unpropnety for Judge Carluccio
– Judge Carluccio did endorse and encourage the an appearance of impropriety by her immediate response to the faxed continuance request without any opportunity for the Defendant to object

On September 23, 2011, whzle reviewing the above information, when the appearance of impropriety became undeniable and clearly evident, Judge Carluccio interrupted the Defendant’s review of information LOUDLY denying any wrongdoingprior before the accusation had even been suggested let alone defiantly made.

Judge Carolyn Carluccio accused the Defendant of requiring 7 deputies around him because of him being intimidating. She neglected to mention her false report to the deputies office in May. The defendant quite clearly told her that HE was NOT intimidating, however, the truth and the law were very intimidating and as the law and the truth were clearly against her, she likely found that very intimidating.

As part of her continuance Order, the following petitions were additionally scheduled for September 23,2011. NO ADDITIONAL TIME WAS ALLOCATED.

PETITION REQUESTING AN 1MMDIATE STAY/RESCREDULING REGARDING THE ORDER OF JULY 18, 2011 AS THE INCOMPLETE WRITTEN ORDER PLACES THE DEFENDANT IN JEOPARDY(filed July 21, 2011)

PETITION REGARDING THE SCHEDULING OF OUTSTANDING PET1TIONS (filed September 1, 2011)

PETITION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE CAROLYN CARLUCCIO (filed September 2, 2011)

Even though the three additional petitions were added for the date, NO ADDITIONAL TIME WAS ALLOCATED ON THE COURT SCHEDULE.


On September 12, 2011, the following petitions were additionally scheduled for September 23, 2011
PETITION REQUESTING DISTRIBUION/DOCKETING OF EX PARTE COURT ORDER (filed August 30, 2011)

PETITION REQUESTING DOCUMENTS AND INJUNCTION BLOCKING SÄLE OF THE HOME UNTIL APPEAL BY TEE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS BEEN DECIDED (filed August 31, 2011)

Even thougb the two additional petitions were added for the date, NO ADDITIONAL TIME WAS ALLOCATED ON THE COURT SCHEDULE.



On September 23, 2011, 1.5 hours have been allowed to hear the following petitions:

COUNTER PETITION FOR SANCTIONS (filed July 14,2011) 6 pages, 35 paragraphs

PETITION REQUESTING AN 1MMDIATE STAY/RESCREDULING REGARDING THE ORDER OF JULY 18, 2011 AS THE INCOMPLETE WRITTEN ORDER PLACES THE DEFENDANT IN JEOPARDY (filed July 21, 2011) 3 pages,9 paragraphs

PETITION REGARDING THE SCHEDULING OF OUTSTANDING PETITIONS (filed September 1, 2011) 4 pages, 5 paragraphs

PETITION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE CAROLYN CARLUCCIO (filed September 2,2011)11 pages, 79 paragraphs

PETITION REQUESTING DISTRIBUTION/DOCKETLNG OF EX PARTE COURT ORDER (filed August 30, 2011) 1 page,4 paragiaphs

PETITION REQUESTING DOCUMENTS AND INJIJNCTION BLOCKING SALE OF THE HOME IJNTIL APPEAL BY TUE SUPERJOR COURT 0? PENNSYLVANIA BAS BEEN DECLDED (filed August 31, 2011) 5 pages, 34 paragraphs

The following petitions remained unscheduled
PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (filed August 15,2011)

PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (filed September 19,2011)

PETITION REQUESTING SCHEDULING OF OUTSTANDING PETITLONS (filed August 19, 2011)

YET ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2011

PLAINTIFF SONYA HEALY’S RESPONSE TO PETITION REQUESTING DOCUMENTS AND INJUNCTION BLOCKING SALE 0F HOME UNTIL APPEAL BY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS BEEN DECIDED
And;
COUNTERPETITION FOR JUDGE TO ORDER DISBURSEMENT OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE SALES OF TEE MARITAL RESIDENCE AS WELL AS SANCTIONS FOR
DEFENDANT’S FRIVOLOUS FILINGS, AND DECLARATORY ORDER PROHIBITING ANY FURTHER FILINGS UNDER THIS DIVORCE DOCKET 9 pages, 70 paragraphs

Filed immediately before the hearing,
accepted/docketed by the Prothonotary on September 23, 2011 at 9:17 AM,
delivered to the Defendant at the beginning of the proceeding,
not properly served,
and withdrawn on September 28,2011 at 4:59 PM
SUPERCEDED ALL other petitions and prevented any testimony or presentation of evidence on the other petitions scheduled to be heard.

THEY ILLEGALLY SOLD MY HOME, THREW OUT ALL OF MY POSSESSIONS, CONSPIRED WITH THE JUDGE, AND REVEALED IT ALL IN COURT WHILE I WAS SURROUNDED BY 7 DEPUTIES THEY WANTED AN ANGRY REACTION WHERE THEY COULD JAIL ME.

Judge Carluccio wanted to beat me up, in public, on the record, in front of a packed courtroom. To bully a Defendant who had been robbed of everything except his integrity and his dignity.

Judge Carluccio wanted my suicide. I did not oblige. She was going to make me pay for forcing her to cover her fraud and corruption.

BUT THERE WAS MORE… Valerie Angst proceeded to blackmail the judge into giving her an additional $11,000.
– when showing the judge the invoices for attorney fees.
– A COPY TO REVIEW WAS DENIED THE DEFENDANT.
– A COPY OF THE DOCUMENT WAS DENIED TO THE DEFENDANT.
– The Ex Parte Document exchanged between Valerie Angst & Judge Carolyn Carluccio was not provided to the defendant BECAUSE IT LISTED OUT THE EX PARTE MEETINGS AND CALLS WHICH SET THE STAGE FOR THE KANGAROO PROCEEDING.
– They were granted $14,000 where they had requested $3,000.

Remember, the matter was under Appeal. The Judge had acknowledged that on the record.

Remember, the lawyers REPEATEDLY FAILED to follow due process which prevents the judge from having jurisdiction. This was deliberate and intentional and designed to manipulate the judges. The tactic succeeded on ALL but one judge. He saw through it, REACTED APPROPRIATELY, AND THEN NEVER HELD THE HEARING, AND WAS REASSIGNED MYSTERIOUSLY AND INEXPLICABLY 6 MONTHS LATER. That was Judge Haaz – formerly of the Supreme Court of PA Disciplinary Organization.

YET, the judges have continued to retaliate against the Defendant, ME, for surviving their 8 years of terror. Attempting to protect the integrity of a judiciary which lacked integrity. And Boldly, Deliberately and Proudly demonstrated their lack of integrity because the next judge would cover for their failures and sacrifice his own integrity at that time. It’s a slippery slope. Ask the 18 judges on the Montgomery County Bench. All but 2 lacked integrity. Judge Haaz as mentioned above, and Judge Dickman who passed away in 2007 – thought the notes on her orders seemed to indicate she knew the types of malicious and vexacious and destructive lawyers involved. Valerie Angst and Robert Angst.

Judge Carolyn Carluccio and the 17 prior judges in this mattrer had been manipulated into fraud, abuse, conspiracy and corruption by Angst & Angst. Lawyers who would throw them under the bus at the first opportunity. Each time they pointed out the judge’s crimes. the judge recused or ordered against the Defendant.

No Judge has held the Plaintiff accountable for failing to follow EVERY Court Order. They had leverage. AND THEY WERE NOT AFRAID TO USE IT.

No Comment.

Add Your Comment

%d bloggers like this: