2013
05.29

They don’t see it.
They don’t hear it.
They don’t respond to it.
They don’t address it.
They don’t acknowledge it.
They don’t engage it.
They don’t explain it.
If they never had it, they never will.
Where it wasn’t, it cannot ever be.
It can cause the complicity of others.
They are powerless without it.
It’s an illusion.
It’s ALWAYS there in their mind.
It’s their imaginary friend, you cannot ask about.
It is the source of their power.
It is a source of their comfort.
It is their addiction.
It is such an important and essential part of them, their power, they can’t imagine being without it.
When they are without it, they will ignore that they are without it.
People enable their delusion referring to them in respectful ways even when they do the most distasteful things
They will act as though they have it,
and become very afraid that it’s not there.
They will never consider for a moment that they don’t have it.
It lets them think that they have the power to control you.

You are permitted to challenge it at any time, because without it,…
it is such an absolutely essential part of what give them their power.
(AND They can’t really imagine being without it, that’s why they ignore that concept entirely.)
Without it, they are powerless.
Without it, they are vulnerable.
Without it, their actions are criminal. And their involvement of others in their actions are equally criminal.

I have learned first hand that it is Judicial Kryptonite.
To mention it in a courtroom… or in a petition… or in any court document.
Any reference to it will result in ” “.
If you attempt to have someone testify to it, there will be an OBJECTION. It will be sustained.
They find such comfort in it, that they will never admit when they do not have it.

Jurisdiction.

In my case, each malicious judicial action lacked one thing. The judge lacked the jurisdiction to act. The judge had other people do their dirty work. That made the other person just as responsible for the act. A judge without jurisdiction is a danger to everyone and themselves.

When jurisdiction is challenged it must be addressed by the Court.
A Judge who neglects to address a question of jurisdiction… doesn’t have it, can’t get it retroactively, acts without it criminally, can’t imagine where it went, will retailate at the inquiry, will fear the discovery, will conceal the failure, and will do everything possible to avoid the repercussions.
They will even go so far as to destroy everything about you to protect themselves, and prevent you from forcing them to acknowledge that it was not there.

But where it was not, it can never be. It is open for challenge at any time.

In my case there was only one judge who took immediate action to assure he had jurisdiction. When raised, he immediately set to the task of assuring it was there. And that it would be there. It meant something to him. He addressed it immediately. He didn’t have to pretend. Without it, he wouldn’t show up to work or order you to show up either. Even when he ordered a hearing to be scheduled. The lack of jurisdiction prevented any action.

I always wondered if Judge Haaz took disciplinary action against the attorneys who attempted to have him act without jurisdiction. Each of the other judges fell into their jurisdictional trap every time. Evil manipulative criminal Angsts.

The sociopath lawyers who leveraged the lack of jurisdiction and were rewarded. The sociopath lawyers who flaunted deliberate and intentional actions to demonstrate the lack of jurisdiction of the judiciary knowing that the judge would conceal their actions and reward them. There was no limit to the actions that the conspiracy of corrupt judiciary and sociopath lawyers would deliver to their victim. They attacked, destroyed and intruded into every aspect of his life determined to undermine and annihilate every nuance.

Judge Page failed to acknowledge his lack of jurisdiction.

JUDGE PAGE FAILED HUGE!

He obstinately refused to acknowledge that he had no jurisdiction. He knew because the petitions weren’t even signed. He knew even before I raised the challenge. Once the challenge was raised he acknowledged in a query “Well if that were true, I would not have jurisdiction.” He did not have jurisdiction, but he couldn’t let it go. He just couldn’t admit to himself that he didn’t have it. And for my posing the challenge he issued his absurd order without jurisdiction for over $300,000 from the unemployed man, made destitute without jurisdiction, made homeless without jurisdiction, where his entire life had been destroyed by an assembly of power junkies who just couldn’t acknowledge their kryptonite.

An action of fraud by Judge Rhonda Daniele perpetuated and hidden for years by all of the judges caused an overall lack of jurisdiction. And where it did not exist, it cannot be provided retroactively under any condition. They never addressed any of my petitions or statements or issues. It wasn’t being ignored. They simply refused to acknowledge that anyone who could suggest their power was not evident was not worth their consideration.

Fraud voids. Lack of jurisdiction voids.

An intervention for the addicts who knowingly and deliberately deny people of life and liberty while perpetrating an elaborate delusion to justifies their abuse of power, fraud, corruption, intimidation and excessively criminal terroristic actions of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas.

I will provide them the opportunity to admit publicly and address their pervasive delusions of jurisdiction as the Defendants in a Federal abuse of power under color of law case that will expose their manipulative and criminal misuse of every department in the county to terrorize me. Each becoming a co-conspirator to their crimes.

The Orders issued in the matter of Healy v Healy are a nullity. They are void ab initio. They never had any validity because they never existed. Void Orders do not exist.

The terror inflicted and the damages done by the delusional judiciary is real. Time to address the reality.

A word to the judiciary. RESIGN.

I am coming legally and your immunity is lost in the void of your corruption and fraud. Lost in your response to the leverage of lawyers rewarded for each terror you inflicted. In a delusional game of destruction of every aspect of a man’s life where there was no escape. The survivor victimized for surviving further necessitating the continued persistent and constant fraud of lawyers and judges who lacked more than the jurisdiction required for their activities. They lacked any moral or ethical ideals. They lacked honor. They permitted, acknowledged, endorsed, enabled, and infected an unfathomable lack of conscience upon a judicial system, a law enforcement system, on the very people who had placed their trust in them. Perpetrating an illusion of justice where there was only deceit, fraud and tremendous corruption and terroristic actions.

You lacked Jurisdiction. You lacked Power. You lacked Immunity.

I am seeking reparations for the terror inflicted every minute of every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year since your illegal, unethical and immoral intrusion into my life in 2007 under color of law.

2013
05.29

When Judge Page was cornered by his absurd order being the subject of a Notice of Appeal, he refused to hear my Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.
Judge Bertin refused.
Judge Austin refused.
NO JUDGE willing to hear the Petition.
At the end of the day, Judge Page signed the Order without a hearing.
It was his order to pay over $300,000 in penalties that was being challenged in the appeal.

April 30, 2013 – I present the Order granting permission to proceed in forma pauperis to the Court Reporter office and coordinate arrangements for the documents to be provided. I was leaving for my father’s funeral the next day and would be out of town for a week.

Later in the week, I contact the Court Reporter office to indicate the hearings required and determine the associated court reporter.

May 15, 2013 – A confirming Request for the Production of Transcripts was filed with the Prothonotary and the Court Reporter Office was notified to assist with coordination of the documents. The document listed each of the hearings and the associated court reporter. It referenced the permission to proceed “in forma pauperis” specifically indicating “cost of transcripts” which would compensate the court reporter for their effort.

May 17, 2013 – As required, I prepare, file, deliver and serve to Judge Page a “Concise List of Errors Complained of On Appeal”. This document MUST include every issue involved in the appeal. If the issue is not included, it may not be addressed in the Appeal. It also may NEVER be included in ANY appeal, Ever. You waive your right to appeal by failing to include issues in this document.

To my knowledge what happened next was that Judge Page began calling the court reporters instructing them to ignore my request for transcripts.

I first learn of this when I get a message from Byron Battle, Chief Court Reporter.

I return Byron’s call. He is questioning the validity of the Order. I had given them a copy of the order on April 30, 2013. It was also on the court docket. It clearly indicated and included “cost of transcripts”. The hearing transcripts requested were directly related to the issues of the appeal.

Judge Page had signed the Order.
(1) Not a forgery.
(2) He issued a subsequent order so he acknowledged it.
(3) Handwritten.
(4) It looked like Judge Page’s Orders usually did.
(5) Judge Page’s Orders always looked as if they were written on scrap paper.
(6) rarely, if ever, titled with the proper citations.
(7) never had the litigants names and titles correct.
(8) It was hand delivered to me by Court Administration.
(9) ODDLY: The VACATE Order does not look anything like prior Orders written by Judge Page.
Would another judge have issued the VACATE order and attributed it to Judge Page?
No ethics, No integrity… Totally possible.
The judges have already proven they are corrupt to the point of destroying every aspect of a person… pushing him to suicide.
Forging a Court Order to cover their asses?
No Shame, No Responsibility… Totally possible.
It is already proven that judges conceal the errors of other judges without regard for the damage caused.

The only thing more absurd than his ordering me to pay over $300,000 was that he did not anticipate the appeal and know the issues it would include.

Judge Page had held the hearings in February and issued the order which was being challenged in the Appeal.
He was very aware of the prior proceedings involved in his order.
The “Concise list” informed Judge Page of the issues.
He had deliberately neglected to address the issues directly in his Order.
Deliberately neglecting the clear lack of jurisdiction
The issues had been presented at EVERY opportunity… and ignored.
– Listed in the Appeal filed August 15, 2011.
– Listed in the Concise Statement of Errors Complained of On Appeal filed September 19, 2011.
– Listed in the Response & Counterpetition filed July 10, 2012
– Listed in the Objection to Reassignment filed December 28, 2012
– Listed in the Letter requesting a Continuance of the January 17, 2013 proceeding. (DENIED)
– Recited in person on January 17, 2013
(In denying the continuance which I had requested as my father was dying, Judge Page ordered me to appear in his courtroom at 9AM the next morning. He arrived at 10AM. His ‘unintentional rescheduling’ of the 1:30 PM proceeding to 9AM necessitated the continuance of the 1:30PM hearing to February 11, 2013.)
– Listed in opening remarks on February 11, 2013.
– Listed in opening remarks on February 20, 2013.
– Listed, Presented, Recited into the court record, Cross referenced with the Docket, Summarized, Testified, Entered and Accepted as Exhibits on February 20, 2013
– Listed in the Request for Accounting filed on February 27, 2013
– Listed in the Notice of Appeal filed April 26, 2013, docketed on April 29, 2013
– Listed in the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Petition filed on April 29, 2013,

Speaking with Byron later in the week, I learned that Judge Page has VACATED the Order in writing… without notice… without any proceeding… violation of procedure. violation of law. violation of ethics. violation of civil rights. violation of constitutional rights. If it were meant to stop me, why would he do everything the wrong way? It is meant to distract. To cause you to lose focus. To cause you to lose hope. To cause you to feel terrorized. To provoke. All he need do is intimidate the Court Reporters. The vacate order is singularly directed to prevent their efforts. AND ONE OTHER THING
It prevents the delivery of the Appeal filed August 15, 2011 from being transmitted to the Superior Court by the Prothonotary. Too late, the question was asked as to why the Appeal was not TRANSMITTED.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and DENIAL OF ACCESS TO THE COURTS are serious offenses.

Causing Another Appeal? That will be three Appeals nested within each other.
Another IFP required to file it. And no judge will sign it.
WAIT!?!?!?!
AN IFP TO PROCEED WITH THE APPEAL OF THE ORDER VACATING THE PRIOR IFP BECAUSE [Multiple Reasons] VOIDS THE VACATE ORDER

I am seeking this to Appeal the absurd Enforcement Order of a void order based on a void order based on a void order based on a void and defective divorce decree which is being appealed.

Petitions trying to obtain the non-existent supporting evidence. More complaints about not holding hearings. An Ex Parte Order without a scheduled hearing. Demand testimony by Judge Page’s imaginary friends who provided the very reliable information… which they cannot testify to… or provide as an exhibit… because it will reveal they have been manipulating the judges to corruption in this case… HOLY SHIT!!! THEY HAVE DONE IT AGAIN.
It would be funny if it wasn’t so perpetual.

Welcome to the nightmare of being manipulated by Angst & Angst.
You will be leveraged, and manipulated until you no longer see that the man who stands before you is the victim.
You have been presented with the truth, on the record, multiple times and multiple ways. You ignore truth.
Truth exposes the failures of the prior judges. They have denied hearings and appeals. They ignored truth, too.
Injustice has terrorized the victim, but you decide to protect the judges from being exposed. By protecting their crimes, you think that you are doing the right thing. Protecting the integrity of the judiciary.
Truth. Integrity. Honor. Justice.
The realization that you have contributed to the injustice arrives with the Concise List. THE LIST IS VALID.
You now need to protect yourself, AND the other judges. You take actions to prevent your errors from being exposed. You know the information telling you exactly what can being challenged.
Cover. Prevent it. You already made your choice. Undo? Order? Cancel? Order? No Hearing? Order? Get help from someone? Call? Block. ORDER!
You are now working to survive an attack by the enemy, the Appellant, the Defendant, the victim… their victim.
There have been 18 judges before you on this divorce.
There has never been any resolution to any issue presented to the court.
The title bar of the web site says:
Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPS.
The man has survived 8 years of this. He’s defending himself against your actions. You resent him for trying to survive your mistake.
You no longer have the power to correct your error in judgment. The only thing you can do it prevent him from embarrassing you.
Do you suppose there was a reason you awarded them so much money?
OMG, Judge Carluccio had awarded the house, the money, everything. He got nothing. And the man said something about her proceeding not being proper because of the appeals, no hearings.
So, the order was void. If he gets it properly before a court it can be addressed.
He did get it before the court… and Judge Page completely ignored it.
It is documented everywhere. EVERYWHERE. Seriously, he wrote it everywhere. How did it get missed?
Do you suppose that Judge Carluccio did all of those things in the recusal petitions AFTER he wrote about it?
Angst & Angst will be back. They will take your mistake and leverage it against the next judge.

Judge Page, you issued a Court Order to protect yourself. IN WRITING! You violated more civil rights. AND, You are on the record. It requires me to petition for the information. Information you can’t / won’t produce. Information you will resent me for asking about.

Bear in mind the sociopath is enjoying your errors more with each subsequent error. You denied them from being the one to tell the victim about your actions.

AND… You have contacted the Court Reporters to prevent them from providing him information that they alone control.

Intimidation? Obstruction of Justice? Evidence Tampering?

Where did your integrity go? You had it? You thought you had integrity. This man was worried. He asked sincerely not intending to offend you. He knows what will be required of the person who can end this terror. He was worried. You thought you had it. He is trying to escape the injustice. You thought the others had it also. Your integrity would protect the judges who didn’t have it. Only to find out you didn’t have it either.
You have completely disregarded that your victim knew what was going to happen and acted as delicately and gently as he could to present it to you. You ignored the warning signs. You ignored the facts. You ignored the law. You ignored procedures. Everything he did was on the record, and without violating rules, ethics, etc. You ignored him. You ignored the truth.

The Court Reporters have been instructed to assure financial arrangements were made with me. The Court which had made me destitute and homeless and was ordering me to pay over $300,000 is very certain I have no money to pay for the transcripts. This was their deliberate intent.
Judge Page was certain that I could not pay the $300,000 he had ordered.
Judge Page does not understand that the sociopath lawyer in his courtroom is never satisfied unless the next action is prepared. I have learned to watch for it.

The sociopath thrives on the terror and damage of their actions.
The sociopath who bills $8,000 to file a court document falsely alleging the failure to return $750 worth of incidental items and gets awarded over $300,000.
The Defendant is homeless and destitute and has been unemployed since 2007.
And …
Judge Page also ordered the him to pay the legal fees.

So hard to persevere sometimes… So hard…

2013
05.29

On May 28, 2013, I went to the Montgomery County Courthouse for the following:

1.) Meeting with Sheriff Eileen Behr.
2.) File and present “Letter to the Judiciary”
3.) File Notice of Appeal (re: Order of May 21, 2013 Judge Garrett Page)
4.) File Petition for Production of “Good Cause Shown”
5.) File Petition to Schedule a Hearing on Ex Parte Order of May 21, 2013
6.) File Petition Requesting Explanation and Reason for the Prothonotary’s Failure to Act on the Appeal Filed August 15, 2011
7.) File Defendant’s Statement in Absence of Transcript (re: Order of May 21, 2013 Judge Garrett Page)

The meeting with Sheriff Behr was the result of a chance meeting in the courthouse last week where I mentioned that she had been avoiding addressing my situation and questions for quite some time. The meeting was an opportunity for her to put a face on my situation. To see the person, the individual, the victim of extreme corruption, destruction and terror. Where every question asked remained unanswered. Where law remained ignored. Where procedures were not followed. Where every person to who I had turned for help never helped. When one big simple question was posed, on presentation of the immediate answer, the expression on Sheriff Behr’s face was clearly genuine. Honest. Indicative. The initial answer indicated that “no answer is available”. At the end of the meeting we resolved to get the answer to the question.

The “Letter to the Judiciary” was filed with the Prothonotary and delivered to the mailroom for distribution. I wanted the judges to recognize that their participation in my destruction was no small thing to me. Their collective “wink wink injustice” was/is inescapable, life-threatening and terrifying and constant.

The NEW Notice of Appeal was NOT ACCEPTED at the Prothonotary. I had been granted “pauper” status when an Appeal was filed on April 26, docketed on April 29. The required paperwork was served, requested and ordered in accordance with published procedure. The ‘concise statement’ was filed and served revealing the basis of the Appeal.

Judge Page immediately
(1) without any proceeding,
(2) acting outside of procedure and law,
(3) illegally,
(4) unethically and
(5) deliberately,
(6) conspired
(7) to obstruct justice and
(8) conceal evidence through
(9) intimidation and
(10) abuse of power
(11) under color of law.
revoked the “pauper” status granted to permit the appeal of his ‘absurd’ Order of April 3, 2013.

His action granting the status had immediately provided access to further evidence which exposed his order was ‘void ab initio’ AND exposed the obstructive actions preventing an Appeal filed August 15, 2011 where the Prothonotary neglects to prepare and transmit an Appeal filed August 15, 2011 to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

The Prothonotary would not accept a NEW Notice of Appeal without “in forma pauperis” status. You can’t appeal the denial of IFP status without IFP status? A knowledgeable employee of the Prothonotary is compelled by the direction of the elected official to deny constitutionally protected rights.

I am not certain who felt worse. It was not fair… him… in that position. Again. I’m sorry for what they did to you. The Courthouse Code of Ethical Conduct prevents the knowledgeable employee from any revealing action. He is afraid to speak. Any contact with me places him at risk. A courthouse deputy confirmed a previous situation was ‘handled’ as I had suspected. The Court Reporters were similarly ‘handled’. Intimidation is a very destructive and demoralizing thing. The people who see, hear and read about the deliberate and destructive abuse of judicial power every day know the active destructive inescapable malice of a corrupt judiciary.

The petitions were filed.

A copy of the NOTICE OF APPEAL was delivered to Judge Page’s chambers.

Judge Page had fair warning. I had filed my objections to the reassignment of the case. Instead of considering my fears of what could happen should there be further integrity issues, Judge Page ignored my concerns. I can’t cause a judge to have integrity, but I could warn him that if he had none, he was going to demonstrate it. I have tried to prevent another judge falling victim to their corruption and further victimizing me.

In 15 minutes or less, in July 2012, Judge Haaz had demonstrated integrity which was powerful enough to stop the continuing terror against me. The hearing he ordered was prevented from the schedule. I think he may have acted… done something. There had to be a reason that Valerie Angst did not want him. He stands out as the ONLY JUDGE TO DO NO HARM to the situation. His Order to schedule a hearing put the case in check. If he had held the hearing, it could have… (but that did not happen.)

Judge Page demonstrated quickly that he lacked integrity. Valerie Angst knew that. She was counting on it. One sentence in the January transcript confirms it.

Judge Page’s actions further caused Judge Austin to act denying access to the court to obstruct the appeal of his absurd order.

Judge Carluccio did not issue the one part of her illegal order of September 23, 2011 because of a vexatious petitioner. The Petitions were becoming a clear documentation of the corruption of the judiciary, their lack of jurisdiction and their deliberate abuse of power under color of law to conceal the transgressions of the prior judges.

The truth can be very intimidating.

2013
05.29

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Sonya Healy : Montgomery County
(Appellee) : #2007-12477
:
v. : Superior Court of Pennsylvania
: #104 EDM 2011
Terance Healy : #1330 EDA 2013
(Appellant)

PETITION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE OF “GOOD CAUSE SHOWN”

AND

PETITION TO SCHEDULE A HEARING ON EX PARTE ORDER OF MAY 21, 2013
AND

PETITION REQUESTING EXPLANATION AND REASON FOR THE PROTHONOTARY’S FAILURE TO ACT ON THE APPEAL FILED AUGUST 15, 2011

1. Defendant has received the Honorable Court’s Order of May 21, 2013 which vacates the Order of April 29, 2012 granting the Defendant permission to proceed in forma pauperis.

2. The Order of May 21, 2013 was executed without a proceeding, or an opportunity for the Defendant to address any issue or change in circumstances being raised.

3. The Order of May 21, 2013 indicates the decision was made “upon good cause shown.”

INAPPROPRIATE EX PARTE COMMUNICATION

4. The Order demonstrates that inappropriate ex parte communication has taken place in regard to the matter and that the information exchanged was of such certain accuracy and undeniable merit as to compel the Court to immediately reverse and rescind the Defendant’s permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

5. Defendant requests the Court provide the circumstances of the ex parte communication along with any available documentation and transcripts of the communication.

6. Defendant recognizes the possibility that the Order may have been vacated based on invalid and fraudulent information provided and improperly accepted by the Court with deliberate and ultimate intent to directly impact, stall or prevent and Appeal, Transcript or Administrative paperwork from being prepared and transmitted with regard to Appeal filed August 15, 2011 and Appeal filed April 26, 2013 and docketed April 29, 2013.

7. Defendant requests that the Court prepare and provide complete evidence of “good cause shown” and serve within 5 days of the filing of this petition to the Defendant permitting the opportunity to address the information which has been considered in an instant ex parte order which has directly hindered the preparation or the Appeal.

DENIAL OF ACCESS TO COURTS

8. In Forma Pauperis permission had been sought and obtained concurrently with the Defendant’s Notice of Appeal and related paperwork to cause to be prepared and transmitted to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in regard to the Appeals filed on August 15, 2011 and April 3, 2013.

9. The Court’s deliberate neglect to address four (4) Petitions to Proceed in Forma Pauperis constitutes an unconstitutional denial of access to the courts which has further caused an Appeal filed on August 15, 2011 to be stalled in the Montgomery County Prothonotary.

FAILED TO ADDRESS/SCHEDULE
Filed December 7, 2010 Judge Wall, Judge Carluccio, Judge Haaz, Judge Page

Filed Dcember 14, 2010 Judge Wall, Judge Carluccio, Judge Haaz, Judge Page

Filed August 15, 2011 Judge Carluccio, Judge Haaz, Judge Page

Filed September 19, 2011 Judge Carluccio, Judge Haaz, Judge Page

HEARING REMAINS UNSCHEDULED

10. Defendant requests that the Court IMMEDIATELY address the failure to schedule a hearing on the Ex Parte Order which has been issued and executed in this matter while failing to schedule the requisite hearing within 10 days of execution of the Order.

DELIBERATE SABOTAGE OF DEFENDANT’s APPEAL

11. Where the Court has neglected with extreme bias to address and resolve the lack of jurisdiction on void orders, challenges to jurisdiction, errors and defects related to orders, and orders issued without proper service and procedure, while accepting and endorsing perjured testimony in his Court, the Defendant requests a explanation of the Court’s action in violation of law and procedure which has again resulted in harm and a continued denial of Constitutionally protected civil rights, and rights to due process and procedure.

12. Defendant asks that the Court IMMEDIATELY address the appearance of sabotage regarding of the Appeals to Superior Court.

13. Defendant submits as supporting exhibit, the one page Order vacating the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis has caused his attention to be shifted as the following additional petitions and collateral documents were necessary to address the ex parte actions of the Court, resulting in 3 concurrent Appeals to the Superior Court at different stages of Appeal.

PROTHONOTARY

14. In contradiction of Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Prothonotary staff has been instructed to NOT prepare and transmit any of the appeal paperwork pending approval of the In Forma Pauperis status.

15. Defendant requests that Mark Levy, Prothonotary address the failure of his department to handle the paperwork properly and specifically address why the prior notice of appeal was not caused to be transmitted to the Superior Court upon notice that the Court had Granted permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed April 30, 2013.

16. Defendant requests that the prothonotary indicate why upon notification of the change In Forma Pauperis status, they STILL neglected to sent the notice of appeal with regard to the Appeal filed August 15, 2013 to the appellate prothonotary.

Respectfully Submitted,

Terance Healy
Pro Se

c/o 871 Mustang Road
Warrington, PA 18976
215-262-0938
215-343-1686

Exhibit A

Order of May 21, 2013
(1 page)

Order of April 30, 2013
(1 page)

Exhibit B

Montgomery County Docket
#2007-12477

Exhibit C

Montgomery County Docket Entry
#2007-12477-399

Exhibit D

Petition for the Production of Documents
filed May 22, 2013

2013
05.29

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Sonya Healy : Montgomery County
(Appellee/Plaintiff) : #2007-12477
:
v. : Superior Court of Pennsylvania
: #104 EDM 2011
Terance Healy : #1330 EDA 2013
(Appellant/Defendant)

DEFENDANT’S STATEMENT IN ABSENCE OF TRANSCRIPT

PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

1. Defendant filed a Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in this matter on December 7, 2010.

2. On December 7, 2010, Defendant appeared before the Honorable Kelly Wall who requested further information and asked for the petition to be resubmitted.

PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (AMENDED)

3. Defendant re-filed a Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in this matter on December 14, 2010.

4. On December 14, 2010, Defendant appeared before the Honorable Kelly Wall who has yet to issue a ruling on the matter.

PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Concurrent with Appeal)

5. On August 15, 2011, Defendant filed a Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis concurrent with a Notice Of Appeal and additional documents as required.

6. On August 15, 2011, the Honorable Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio, the “signing judge”, was not available to hear the instant petition.

DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS / PROCEDURES / ACCESS TO THE COURTS

7. The Court has not held scheduled a hearing on the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

8. The Court did not address the request to schedule the hearing in a PETITION REQUESTING THE SCHEDULING OF OUTSTANDING PETITIONS filed August 19, 2011.

9. On August 22, 2011, acknowledging the appeal the Court ordered a Concise Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal pursuant to Pa. R.A.P Rule 1925(b) docketed on August 25, 2011.

10. On September 1, 2011, a Petition Regarding the Scheduling of Outstanding Petitions was filed and included the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

11. On September 2, 2011, a Petition for the Recusal of Judge Carolyn Carluccio was filed.

12. A prior request for recusal had been filed on March 16, 2011 as

PETITION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE CAROLYN TORNETTA CARLUCCIO FOR CONSPIRACY, CORRUPTION, FRAUD, INTIMIDATION, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS / PROCEDURE AND DENIAL OF CIVIL RIGHTS

13. On March 29, 2011, the recusal petition was DENIED without discussion or opportunity for testimony regarding the issues documented.

14. On September 15, 2011, a Concise Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal was filed and served on Judge Carluccio.

15. On September 19, 2011, the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was resubmitted.

16. Ignoring the law while citing instructions from Judge Carluccio, the Prothonotary refuses to transmit the appeal or notify the appellate prothonotary of the appeal prior to the Petition To Proceed in Forma Pauperis being approved.

17. On September 20, 2011, an Extraordinary Petition to Proceed in Forma Pauperis was filed directly with the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Collateral documentation include all documents relating to the Notice of Appeal which is not being permitted out of Norristown.

18. On September 20, 2011, The Defendant’s Extraordinary Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was submitted directly to the Superior Court Of Pennsylvania. Docket #104 EDM 2011

19. Pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. Rule 554(b) the Superior Court Docket #104 EDM 2011 which includes the Defendant/Appellant’s Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and related exhibits constitutes notice to an appellate prothonotary of the pendancy of the appeal.

ABUSE OF POWER UNDER COLOR OF LAW

20. On September 23, 2011, the Court refused to address the four (4) Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis pending activity on the calendar.

21. On September 23, 2011, Judge Carolyn Carluccio incorrectly denied being the ‘signing judge’ responsible for the petition on August 15, 2011.

22. On September 23, 2011, Judge Carolyn Carluccio conducted a hearing
where she lacked jurisdiction during the pending appeal,
where she lacked jurisdiction as the petition under consideration had been filed immediately before the proceeding and the Defendant had not been served,
where the Defendant had not been permitted time to read the petition,
where the Defendant had not been permitted time to prepare a response to the petition,
where the Defendant was not permitted to testify,
where the Defendant was not permitted to call witnesses,
where all of the petitions which had been filed, properly served and scheduled for the proceeding were summarily declared moot without discussion.
where the petition filed immediately before the proceeding related to an order issued on July 18, 2011 where the Court was similarly without jurisdiction as the Defendant had not been served with the petition

31. On September 23, 2011, Judge Carluccio was aware of every issue relating to the Appeal of her defective Order of May 9, 2011 having ordered and been served the Concise Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal on September 15, 2013.

32. On September 23, 2011, Judge Carluccio was aware that the Appeal would challenge and void her subsequent Order of July 18, 2011 where she had indicated that she did not have jurisdiction in the matter.

33. On September 23, 2011, Judge Carluccio issued an Order part on the record and part in written form where each issue granted to the relief being requested in the Plaintiff’s petition filed immediately before the hearing.

34. On September 28, 2011, Valerie Angst filed a preacipe to withdraw the petition filed immediately before the proceeding on September 23, 2011 which was the basis for the Order of September 23, 2011.

35. The Order of September 23, 2011 prohibited the Defendant “from filing any further petitions/motions regarding events that occurred prior to the date of this Order” and intended to prevent the Defendant from any further litigation.

36. Defendant followed the Order of September 23, 2011 while awaiting information about the progress of the Appeal.

MALICE / TERROR / ABUSE OF POWER UNDER COLOR OF LAW

37. Irreparable damage had occurred which included the deliberate and intentional unlawful and unethical ex parte participation of Judge Carolyn Carluccio to issue void orders, delay hearings and prevent the appeal from being transmitted to the Superior Court.

38. While the overwhelming bias of the equitable distribution was intentional and clearly evident, bias or unfairness are not grounds for an appeal.

39. The equitable distribution ordered the Defendant to be homeless; gave the Plaintiff full financial control; granted a misleading and invalid power of attorney to a Plaintiff who had violated Agreed Orders, burglarized the Defendants home, refused to permit visitation with the parties children, not followed any court order and was excused every time the Defendant filed with the Court to enforce compliance with court orders; and neglected to address any issue properly presented to the court by the Defendant.

40. Judge Carluccio had not expected the fatal defect which would render the divorce decree void to be discovered, documented, and a valid reason for APPEAL.

41. On Appeal, the bias of the equitable distribution order would further validate the Defendant’s allegations which were ignored in the petitions filed requesting Judge Carluccio to recuse.

42. The Defendant was regularly informed by the Prothonotary that the Appeal was awaiting action on the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT

43. On October 14, 2011 (#104 EDM 2011), the Superior Court denied the Defendant’s Extraordinary Petition to Proceed in Forma Pauperis citing “where there was no appeal pending before the Superior Court and that court’s jurisdiction was not being infringed upon by the trial court’s action, there was no predicate for Superior Court’s exercise of jurisdiction to issue writ of prohibition; Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has original jurisdiction to issue a writ on the lower court where no appeal is pending.”

44. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania was notified of the pending appeal in the Defendant’s Petition filed directly with the appellate prothonotary on September 20, 2011 and assigned #104 EDM 2011.

45. On October 18, 2011, the Montgomery County Prothonotary received, acknowledged and docketed #2007-12477-355 the related Superior Court Order dated October 14, 2011 #104 EDM 2011 .

46. On October 19, 2011, Judge Carluccio filed her Opinion related to the Appeal.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE / DENIAL OF ACCESS TO THE COURTS

47. Forbidden by Order of the Court from filing any petition/motion relating to events before September 23, 2011, the Defendant waited for the hearing to be scheduled.

48. After Plaintiff’s filing of a petition in May 2012, Defendant learned of the assignment of the matter to Judge Haaz.

OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD IN COURT

49. On July 10, 2012, in open court, Judge Haaz reviewing the Defendant’s Response and Counterpetition;
(1) heard the Defendant’s statement that his appearance in court was not a waiver of due process, procedure, and further not a waiver of the pending appeal filed August 15, 2011;
(2) immediately addressed Angst & Angst’s failure to serve the petition to Defendant which if left unaddressed would contribute to a lack of jurisdiction;
(3) learned about Valerie Angst’s secret efforts with Court Administration to have Judge Haaz removed from the matter;
(4) learned about Valerie Angst’s secret efforts with Judge Carluccio to have Judge Haaz removed from the matter;
(5) issued an Order for Court Administration to schedule a protracted hearing on the matter.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

50. The hearing was never scheduled. Defendant’s letters to Judge Haaz, Court Administrator Michael Kehs, and Family Court Administrator Cheryl Leslie regarding the failure to schedule the hearing were ignored.

REASSIGNMENT TO PREVENT COLLATERAL REVIEW

51. A December 13, 2012 Order announced the matter reassigned to Judge Page and a hearing scheduled for January 17, 2013 on the Plaintiff ‘s May 2012 petition.

52. Citing the failure to schedule the pending Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, the ommission of the Defendant’s Response & Counter Petition in the citation, the successful reassignment from Judge Haaz and other issues, on December 28, 2012, Defendant filed Objections to the Reassignment of the Matter/Petition to Enforce the Scheduling Order of July 10, 2012.

53. The Reassignment petition was not addressed by Judge Haaz before the reassignment date.

54. Refiled as an emergency petition, on January 3, 2013 Judge Page ordered the petition to be scheduled in due course.

55. The failure to coordinate scheduling, cite the proper petition titles and list the correct names of the litigants and their legal representatives resulted in
Order of January 17, 2013
Order of January 18, 2013
Order of January 24, 2013
Order of January 29, 2013
Order of January 30, 2013
Order of February 1, 2013
Order of February 12, 2013
Order of February 13, 2013
Order of February 15, 2013

CREDABILITY DETERMINATION / LEGAL ISSUES IGNORED

65. During the hearing on February 11, 2013, jurisdiction was challenged by the pending appeal, Judge Page refused to address the issue of his lack of jurisdiction.

66. During the hearing on February 20, 2013,
jurisdiction was challenged and the Court did not address the issue;
the defects of the void order which the plaintiff was seeking to enforce were presented and the Court did not address the issue;
the defects of the void order upon which the void order was based were presented and the Court did not address the issue;
the defects of the equitable distribution order and defective divorce decree were presented and the Court did not address the issue.

67. During the hearing, the Court acknowledged the Defendant’s financial condition and denied the Defendant’s request to produce the transcript for the September 23, 2011 hearing.

68. The Montgomery County Prothonotary has not transmitted or prepared any documents relating to the August 15, 2011 Notice of Appeal to the appellate prothonotary.

FAILURE TO PREPARE/TRANSMIT THE APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT

69. The Montgomery County Prothonotary indicated that they will take no action to prepare and transmit the appeal until the Petition To Proceed In Forma Pauperis is ordered by the court.

70. The Court Reporters have taken no action to produce transcripts related to the Appeal filed August 15, 2013.

71. On March 12, 2013, the transcripts for the half-day hearing on February 11, 2013 and the full day hearing on February 20, 2013 are entered on the docket.

72. On March 14, 2013, the Exhibits related to the February 11, 2013 and February 20 hearings are entered on the docket. The Plaintiff’s exhibits are missing from the exhibit document.

COURT ORDER OF APRIL 3, 2013

73. On April 3, 2013, Judge Page issues an absurd order which neglects to address the challenges to jurisdiction, neglects to address the pending appeal, neglects to address void defective orders, and orders the homeless and destitute Defendant to pay over $300,000 to the Plaintiff.

74. The Order of April 3, 2013 did not address any pending Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

APPEAL FILED APRIL 26, 2013

75. On April 26, 2013, a Notice of Appeal relating to the Order of April 3, 2013 and associated documents were presented to the Prothonotary. The clerk refused to docket the Notice of Appeal until the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was granted by the Court.

DENIAL OF ACCESS TO THE COURT

76. On April 29, 2013, Defendant filed another Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

77. On April 29, 2013, the timestamped Notice of Appeal is served upon Judge Page who refuses to address the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and directs the Appellant to Court Administration.

78. Court Administration directs the Appellant to Judge Emanuel Bertin.

79. Judge Emanuel Bertin refuses to address the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and directs the Appellant to Court Administration.

80. Court Administration directs the Appellant to Judge Cheryl Austin.

81. Judge Austin keeps the Appellant waiting for two hours in the hallway outside her courtroom. Then a member of Judge Austins staff indicates that Judge Austin refuses to address the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and directs the Appellant to Court Administration.

82. Appellant waits for over 2 hours outside Court Administration while they search for an available judge to address the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

83. Appellant instructs Court Administration to contact him if they succeed in finding a judge to address the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

84. At the end of the day, Court Administration contacts the Appellant indicating that they have found a judge to address the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

CITE INVALID LAW

85. The Appellant is instructed that he must return to the courthouse to sign the Order. A New Rule?

86. On April 30, 2013, the single page document requiring signature has already been signed by Judge Garrett Page and numbering on it begins at the number six (6).

87. In the entire history of this matter the Defendant has never been required to sign a Court Order.

PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS GRANTED

88. The Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis GRANTED by Judge Page is filed with the Prothonotary on April 30, 2013. There was no hearing.

CONCISE STATEMENT OF ERRORS REQUESTED

89. On April 30, 2013, Judge Page orders a Concise Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. Rule 1925(b).

TRANSCRIPTS FOR THE MATTER REQUESTED

90. On May 15, 2013, Appellant files a Request for the Production of Transcripts and meets with the Administrator in the Court Reporters Office to coordinate delivery.

CONCISE STATEMENT OF ERRORS FILED/SERVED

91. On May 17, 2013, Appellant files the Concise Statement of Errors Complained Of On Appeal and serves the document to Judge Page.

PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS VACATED

92. On May 21, 2013, without notice, with any hearing and refering to ‘good cause shown’, Judge Page vacates his Order regarding the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

93. The ex parte ORDER to VACATE specifically prevents preparation of hearing transcripts which support the Appellants statements provided in the Concise Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal.

94. Where a Petition to proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied, in whole or in part, the court shall briefly state its reasons. Pa. R.A.P. Rule 552(e).

Pa. R.A.P. Rule 552(e) Consideration and action by the court indicates “the application and verified statement shall be submitted to the court, which shall enter its order thereon within 20 days from the date of the filing of the application. If application is denied, in whole or in part, the court shall briefly state its reasons.”

_____________________________________________________-

A R G U M E N T

Over the course of the matter, the judiciary has denied justice, and allowed perjury without consequence.

Without explanation terrorizing, attacking and dismantling every aspect of my life.

Acting without jurisdiction, ignoring the law, citing invalid law while valid issues and facts are ignored, evidence is concealed.

Orders were written which were unrelated to the hearing, motions and petitions were not heard, filed documents somehow became unfiled. Recommendations were written where the information had not been presented.

Constitutional rights were ignored, the court violated and ignored the Rules of Civil Procedure.

Judges refused to recuse or disqualify themselves with no thought to violations of their Oath of Office and Code of Judicial Conduct.

Judge conspired and coordinated denial of civil rights with Fellow Judges, prevented the protection of law enforcement to the point where any crime committed against him was left unpunished.

There has been a constant threat of monetary sanctions, and activities designed to cause trauma and stress.

The constant revelations of inappropriate ex parte communications were presented by Angst & Angst exposing their advantage and the bias of the court. When asked to address the circumstances the court never complied.

When it all came down, Judge Carluccio acts causing judicial immunity to be void, not just for herself, but for all of the judges. To conceal the crime, she orders one party to be homeless, further endorses and enables the fraudulent sale of his home and the destruction of his property. Appearances in Judge Carluccio’s court were unlawful, disrespectful and destructive. She never had jurisdiction. Not even for as much as on hearing.

And then, after surviving the years of terror which were designed to push someone to suicide. I survive. I follow the law. I follow the orders. Judge Page absurdly ignores all aspects of law and issues an order ordering a destitute man to pay over $300,000 in fines when even though he had followed the Order, the plaintiff and her attorney lied. It would all be proven in the court transcripts.

Judge Page who apparently did not consider his absurd decision would be appealed, would qualify to proceed in forma pauperis, and would permit production of the transcripts.

How could Judge Page block and prevent the appeal as successfully as Judge Carluccio had done. She had made me homeless and destitute.
Judge Page added another $300,000 to the money owed based on VOID orders while ignoring his obligation to address jurisdiction challenges.

As I seek to proceed in forma pauperis, it begins to demonstrate denial of access to the courts. Judge Austin, who has never met me, wants nothing to do with the case. AFTER 2 hours in her hallway. Judge Page signs the IFP and pays the fee.

But when Judge Page learns that the transcripts will be produced, he vacates his order once again preventing access to the transcripts, BUT creating another matter for another Appeal. More attention… and the question…Why would he do that?

His game is to cause deadlines to be missed. Instead he has caused 3 appeakls where there had been one,

There is no escaping the terror of the Montgomery County Court. The victims of their injustice only live each day to be further victimized.

Judge Garrett Page vacated his order with the intention to obstruct justice… to prevent justice… to terrorize the victim of 8 years of injustice and make it seem as if he missed a shuffled deadline and he lost the opportunity to do anything which might permit him to have any life in the future.

A truly hateful thing to do to their victim … because he survived.

%d bloggers like this: