2013
03.28

I guess the last hearing was so nice, they want to do it twice.

The Court has scheduled another version of the same hearing – Short Listed for April 29, 2013 based on a document they filed on February 27, 2013.

They just want to stress me out, eh?

Every holiday has been affected by a looming scheduled court date since 2007.

Threats, intimidation, stalking, terror. Call it by any and every name. It is EVIL… It is destructive. It is unending.

They still haven’t figured out how to get out of the fraud, corruption and malice I exposed in February.

I’ll present it to them again and again…

2013
03.28

The device pictures was mysteriously attached to the house one day. I did not see it done, My mother did not see it done. And the neighbor who asked what it was did not see it installed.

My mother called the township and asked about it, and they indicated they did not install it on the house.

I went to the Township building and asked if it was their device, and when it was installed. The woman I spoke to indicated that she had no paperwork regarding the installation. She would get back to us.

That was on March 28, 2013. It has been two weeks and there has been no explanation of the device which appears to be some sort of signal repeater.

When you consider that both my mother and I have photographed and approached several people who “loitered” in front of the house with tablets, phones and laptops running and connecting to our network… Could it be that someone wanted the netowrking signal to be boosted a little further to avoid further detection when people hang a little too close to the house.

As has happened whenever devices are discovered, someone knocks on the door selling something within hours of the devices being discovered, removed. In this case he was pretending to sell windows and roofing. Umm, He had no brochures/paperwork. After I indicated I was not interested, he stood at the end of the driveway for about 5 minutes. He then came back and stood across the street on his cell phone for another 10 minutes. It would have been easier is he had asked what was done to the device to disable it.

2013-03-28 09.28.502013-03-28 09.29.002013-03-28 09.29.082013-03-28 09.29.192013-03-28 10.25.542013-03-28 10.26.082013-03-28 10.26.182013-03-28 13.34.022013-03-28 13.34.132013-03-28 13.34.522013-03-28 13.35.02

Still no word from anyone about who installed it, when they did it, and why it was installed. Sure looks like a water meter reader repeater… but the distance to the street hasn’t changed … what would suddenly necessitate a repeater?

2013
03.23

“A bill making its way through the Pennsylvania state legislature with strong bipartisan support would give law enforcement a tool it says is crucial in combating sexual exploitation and abuse of children, although some critics are concerned that the proposed legislation would let authorities bypass the court system and that it could threaten individual privacy.”

What about cases where files are illegally placed on a target’s computers/cell phone… TO SET THEM UP? How does the new law protect the rights of the innocent target?

Rushing to action/judgement when someone’s life and reputation and credibility are at stake cannot be excused by indicating the safety of the children are at risk.

No child should ever be victimized… not when they are children, and NOT once they grow up.

State Rep. Todd Stephens and District Attorney Risa Ferman have taken a Constitutional oath that includes protecting everyone’s rights. Why do so many people who stand on their first day of work and take an oath to do a job pay absolutely no attention to the oath they are speaking?

Todd & Risa already know that the software exists to cause this SET-UP scenario… And the programs have been provided to the County, and many towns through Federal programs. The capabilities are also available to the entire population as an “off the shelf” product called WEBWATCHER. It is stealth software which can cause complete havoc with someones life, and completely undermine effective communications. AND IT CAN BE ILLEGALLY DEPLOYED ONTO YOUR COMPUTER THROUGH EMAIL, and other means. Ask Jaimie Kronic, formerly of Awareness Technologies, she was fired for confirming that installation information to me in 2008. Jaimie CONFIRMED it, she didn’t disclose it. She provided that information in exchange for the method I used to detect their program.

A similar type of software was used to spy on the high school children in Lower Merion. Philly’s “Bonnie & Clyde” used a similar package to hack the neighbors in their apartment. And I think it is what was used to make it appear that Gabriele Drexler committed perjury. This type of unreliable computer information should not be used as a basis for ignoring any persons civil rights.

Child Pornography is a federal crime that is investigated and prosecuted by the FBI. What has caused this need to take action at a state, county or local level? OH, and the FBI doesn’t rely on the type of information being requested by this new subpeona. The FBI is aware of the computer loopholes. Their investigations catch the person in the act. They do not act to deny people’s rights based on a potentially false allegation.

And why create new laws when the laws which are on the books are clearly not being followed. Read this web site and see the demonstrated litany of ignored crimes. Crimes COMPLETELY ignored by D.A. Risa Ferman – and those crimes affected MY children.

Todd Stephens was made aware of the extreme corruption and had copies of many of the documents as Judge Carolyn Carluccio was abusing her power under color of law with such extreme disregard for the law and bias and malice toward a litigant trying to survive in her courtroom. I spent hours with his staff telling them what was happening. YET, Todd Stephens did nothing to help.

WHY is doing everything for the children becoming an automatic tagline for every politician? Don’t politicians realize that the kids will grow up to find out that their parents stood idly by while they lost their civil and human rights? All under the misconception that it was being done FOR the children.

Tell that to the high schoolers who were illegally photographed by school administrators secretly through their laptops. Imagine the pictures which were obtained. Early reports of that story indicated the school administration was following the advice from Montgomery County Detectives to use the programs. Yea… I think they have alot of experience in those types of things. Ray Kuter and Montgomery County Detectives never helped resolve the intrusion on my computers. They ignored it.

In January 2008, Judge Arthur Tilson cancelled a protection from abuse order which specifically detailed the intrusion into my computers/phones. That permitted the crime to go uninvestigated and unprosecuted… makes you think I was reporting the crime to those who were committing it.

See the full article:
http://www.thereporteronline.com/article/20130321/NEWS01/130329893/proposed-bill-would-give-law-enforcement-administrative-subpoena-powers-to-investigate-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse-of-children?mobredirect=true

2013
03.21

514a923301bcb.imagePhoto by Laurence Kelly PhillyBurbs.com

In 2007, Judge Arthur Tilson excused a case of illegal surveillance of computers and telephones indicating that PA Law was not ready for 1984. It was a Federal Crime. And George Orwell’s 1984 was 23 years before the hearing in his courtroom. The illegal surveillance and intrusion into my computers and phones disrupted every aspect of my life and continued for years… and continues today.

Later, Judge Arthur Tilson would issue ex parte orders without any opportunity for hearings or response. ORDERING ME TO PERMIT MY SON TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY ALONE AND IF I WERE TO DO ANYTHING TO STOP THE TRIP I WOULD FACE JAIL TIME.

In violation of PA Law there were no hearing ever on the matter. PA Law requires a hearing to be held on any ex parte order within 10 days. I guess Judge Tilson was unaware of that law too, and the Hague convention regarding child custody, and the State Department’s published warnings about international abduction.

AND Judge Tilson was acting on an issue that Judge Thomas DelRicci had deliberately and intentionally ignored as he went off on vacation. The suggestion was made that Angst & Angst used the Secret Order of Judge Rhonda Daniele to FALSELY AND FRAUDULENTLY indicate to Judge Tilson that I had no custody of my son.

Perhaps Pennsylvania is not ready for continued inaction and ignoring crimes by an overpaid and stagnant judge who considers himself above the law.

IMAGINE… a judge who opposes following the State Constitution? Who doesn’t enforce the laws of the State or the Country?
“The veteran jurist, who will turn 70 in May, is challenging a provision in the Pennsylvania state Constitution that requires all judges to vacate their bench seats on the last day of the year that he turns 70.”

http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/the_intelligencer_news/montco-judge-battles-to-keep-black-robe/article_bc911c15-1f63-5697-ba84-3c6e0d945156.html

2013
03.18

I am currently unable to review the hearing transcripts which have been entered on the Docket a week ago.

As an electronically registered litigant, I was notified of the availability of the entries when they were docketed, and advised that I could view the filings via the E-Filing System.

When I attempted to access the files last week, the access was denied.

I spoke to the Prothonotary this morning and they failed to resolve the issue.

The contact person (A) indicated that Divorce filings are not available. WRONG.
Even to the litigants. WRONG.
It would be necessary to come in to the Courthouse to review the file. WRONG.
(Transcripts are not permitted to be copied at the 25 cents per page price in the Prothonotary.)

The second contact person (M) indicated those filings are NOT available to me.
This is contrary to the notice received.
This is contrary to the experience accessing prior filings of this type.
He checked with his supervisor. “Deputy” and confirmed that he could not provide me with access. He required a Court Order to permit me to have access to the documents.

He (M) did not provide false information, or false excuses.

He (M) suggested I contact the Court Reporter directly for copies.

The Court Reporter has already transcribed the 2 days of testimony. One document is 170 pages. The other is 337 pages.

The Court Reporter would charge me $2 per page… Total Cost of the 2 documents/transcripts would be $1014.00

Considering the court, which has caused me to be homeless and destitute through invalid and void orders, has failed to hear or respond to the multiple outstanding Petitions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP) which have been filed on four separate occasions, this failure is tantamount to a clear, deliberate and intentional denial of due process, with obvious intent to conceal and conspire to conceal the unconstitutional and unlawful actions of the court and related courthouse personnel et al.
IFP #264 Filed on December 7, 2010 – before Judge Kelly Wall (Signing Judge was Judge Bertin, unable to hear because of his prior recusal.)
IFP #268 Filed on December 14, 2010 – before Judge Kelly Wall
IFP #329 Filed on August 15, 2011 – Concurrent with Appeal filing – before Judge Carolyn Carluccio (Designated Signing Judge)
IFP #350 Filed on September 19, 2011 – before Judge Carolyn Carluccio

It was mentioned during the course of the hearings that the multiple outstanding IFP Petitions were now in the court of Judge Page for resolution. No hearing has been scheduled. Judge Page has not yet issued any order sua sponte regarding those petitions, or the multiple nested void orders clearly presented in his courtroom. The ONLY issues properly before the court with the judge having jurisdiction to act, were on those issues.

Are they denying me the transcripts which prove a hearing took place over 2 days where the court lacked jurisdiction?

Are they denying me the documents because the transcripts would prove the fraud upon the court by Valerie Angst?

Are they denying me the transcripts because it would prove the perjury of Sonya Healy during the course of the hearings?

Are they denying me the documents because they know I am destitute and cannot afford the fees?

Are they denying me the transcripts because of the larger conspiracy to deny civil rights and ignore the extreme abuse of power of the judges in this matter?

Are they denying me the documents because they have recognized that the continued injustice exacerbated by Carolyn Carluccio has resulted in a loss of judicial immunity for every judge in this matter?

AND again… the EFiling program which permits access is STILL using an outdated and expired invalid certificate which causes the user to permit the security of his computer to be completely compromised. Only a paranoid person would suggest that the County is hacking every computer used to access their system. THOUGH, only a hacker would fail to secure their system even when they have been advised on multiple occasions. Their failure to take action is AN ACTION. And when they have just rebuilt their web site, the intent seems clearer and absolutely deliberate.

They will continue to terrorize me until they kill me. I have noted in recent court filings that my life is in danger. That I have been stalked and followed by private investigators. That property has been damaged. That I feel they will murder me as I have exposed their personnel and their corrupt and criminal actions.

Angst & Angst have closed their law offices in Doylestown, and have seemingly been provided the opportunity to sell off or effectively conceal assets which could be sold for damages against their criminal actions.

I live in fear… and they continue to deny justice… because no one will stop them.

2013
03.15

In Pennsylvania, when a judge (#14) issues a void order, and then issues a subsequent void order based on that first void order (which is void on it’s own failures in addition to it’s relation to the original void order), and then issues a third void order (which again is void on it’s own failures and NOT simply because of the prior void orders),and then has additionally failed to permit/deliberately prevented the properly filed Appeal from being released to the Superior Court for consideration…. (The Appeal was acknowledged by the judge and was being processed when the 3rd void order was issued.)

Judge #14 is removed from the matter.

When enforcement is attempted, and the void-ness is proven during the defendant’s presentation at the hearing – AND the judge (#15) finds he truly DOES lack jurisdiction additionally because of the pending appeal, should it be expected that the judge will rule sua sponte on the void orders, or will he require specific motions to that effect?

This is an actual case. www.work2bdone.com/live

http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/in-pennsylvania–how-do-you-have-a-void-order-decl-1156490.html

Link

2013
03.13

It has been 3 weeks since the court date where I proved the void orders, based on the void orders, based on the void orders of Carolyn Carluccio… AND her deliberate and intentional prevention and fraud involved in preventing my Appeal.

I have $1 in my pocket. The same dollar I had in my pocket on February 20, 2013.

And I await their answer… The judge will either expose their crimes, or further the injustice, or rule according to the law in my favor. OR? He may just wait while I live in fear with $1 to my name until they kill me and this nightmare goes away.

2013
03.07

Will I lose my dignity?
Will someone care?
Will I wake tomorrow from this nightmare?

As a mantra these lines instill hope. They are not a complaint. They are a realization and a visualization that the solution is out there still waiting to be found.

Perseverance can be empowering.

2013
03.06

When the [void] Divorce Decree was issued by Carolyn Carluccio along with a [void] Equitable Distribution which was deliberately and intentionally designed to prevent me from obtaining any by funds which would permit me to pursue further litigation through Appeal… There was talk of this “Unappealable Order of Carolyn Carluccio” which would not permit me to appeal the decision.

Apparently, Carolyn Carluccio hadn’t counted on the incompetence of Angst & Angst… which had to be deliberate because every lawyer knows there are requirements which must be met to ensure jurisdiction and a proper hearing.

BUT…

By intentionally rendering VOID Orders/Judgments, Carolyn Carluccio denied this indigent Defendant immediate access to the Superior Courts and Federal courts, and she was acting as private citizen stripped of her black robe, authority, and immunity.

Carolyn Carluccio also has exposed the prior judges to a similar lack of immunity because of the overall appearance of a conspiracy to deny justice which has persisted throughout the matter all the way back to the issuance of THE SECRET ORDER OF JUDGE RHONDA DANIELE in August 2007.

The Judges deliberate and intentional undermining of the Defendant’s rights is evident.

2013
03.06

VOID ORDERS CAN BE ATTACKED AT ANY TIME IN ANY COURT PROVIDED THAT PARTY IS PROPERLY BEFORE COURT

No Notice, No Jurisdiction, No Authority to Grant Relief, and the Judgment is VOID!

“It is fundamental that no judgment or order affecting the rights of a party to the cause shall be made or rendered without notice to the party whose rights are to be affected.” Tyron Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Phelps, 307 S.C. 361, 362, 415 S.E.2d 397, 398 (1992). Generally, a person against whom a judgment or order is taken without notice may rightly ignore it and may assume that no court will enforce it against his person or property. Id.
See Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 389. “Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proven to exist.” See also Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215., “There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction.” See also Rosemond V. Lambert, 469 F2d 416., The burden shifts to the courts to prove jurisdiction.

If a court grants relief, which under the circumstances it hasn’t any authority to grant, its judgment is to that extent void.” (1 Freeman on Judgments, 120-c.) An illegal order is forever void.

1. Four Factors to Determine whether a Judge’s Act is a “Judicial” One

To determine whether a judge’s act is a “judicial” one, the Court is to consider four factors: (1) whether the act complained of is one normally performed by a judge; (2) whether the act occurred in the courtroom or an appropriate adjunct such as the judge’s chambers; (3) whether the controversy centered around a case pending before the judge; and (4) whether the act arose out of a visit to the judge in his judicial capacity.” Malina v. Gonzales, 994 F.2d 1121, 1124 (5th Cir.1993).

(1) whether the act complained of is one normally performed by a judge: Rainey’s imposing on this indigent Plaintiff the Clerk’s duties to “issue and serve all process, and perform all duties in such cases” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(d), and refusing to reinstate the complaints dismissed sua sponte under Rule 1-041(E)(2) of Rules Enabling Act, which is mandatory, are not acts normally performed by a judge.

(2) whether the act occurred in the courtroom or an appropriate adjunct such as the judge’s chambers: The acts neither occurred in the courtroom nor an appropriate adjunct such as the judge’s chambers because without service of process, no parties were present, and there was no subject matter before the judge for adjudication;

(3) whether the controversy centered around a case pending before the judge: Since there was neither subject matter nor personal jurisdiction, there was no controversy that centered around any case pending before the judge and

(4) whether the act arose out of a visit to the judge in his judicial capacity: The decision was made in his administrative, ministerial, non-judicial, non-adjudicative, personal, private-citizen capacity. Without subject matter and parties before him, whatever he did was not done in his judicial, but personal, capacity.

2. There are only two circumstances when a judge is not entitled to judicial immunity: (1) when he performs acts not in his judicial capacity and (2) when he performs act, although judicial in nature, in the complete absence of all jurisdiction. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991). Here, Judge Rainey is not entitled to judicial immunity because (1) when he rendered the Order to Dismiss without prejudice, he was not performing acts in his judicial capacity; he was making an administrative, ministerial, non-judicial, non-adjudicative decision; and (2) when he performs act, although judicial in nature, in the complete absence of all jurisdiction: neither subject matter nor personal jurisdiction was present; he was without any authority to hear the case and determine any issue. Neither is Judge Jack entitled to judicial or absolute immunity because without service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 (d) while the indigent Plaintiff was proceeding in forma pauperis, she was in the complete absence of all jurisdiction.

3. Congress meant to provide individuals immediate access to the federal courts. See Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 (1988).

4. By rendering VOID Orders/Judgments, both judicial officers denied this indigent Plaintiff immediate access to the federal courts, and were acting as private citizens stripped of their black robes, authority, and immunity.

5. In addition, they committed fraud upon the court. “Fraud upon the court” has been defined as that fraud committed by an officer of the court in any attempt to deceive, either by commission, by omission, by speech, by silence, by gesture, by innuendo, by look, etc. Whenever this fraud is committed in a court of law by any attorney or judge, it is a “fraud upon the court”. In re Eugene Lee Armentrout et al., 99 Ill.2d 242, 75 Ill.Dec. 703, 457 N.E.2d 1262 (1983); Regenold v. Baby Fold, Inc., 68 Ill.2d 419, 435, 12 Ill.Dec. 151, 369 N.E.2d 858 (1977); In re Lamberis, 93 Ill.2d 222, 229, 66 Ill.Dec. 623, 443 N.E.2d 549 (1982); Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (1985); Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co., 169 F.2d 514 (1948).

6. “Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication.” Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23. The 7th Circuit further stated “a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never becomes final.”

7. Since a “fraud upon the court” vitiates the entire case, all the VOID Orders/Judgments rendered by the federal and state courts must be stricken as orders from the court, as none of the courts held subject-matter jurisdiction. No court has the lawful authority to validate a void order. U.S.v. Throckmorton, 98U.S.61,25 L.Ed. 93 (1878); Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 64 S.Ct. 997 (1943); Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.,169 F.2d 514 (1948); In re Garcia, 109 B.R. 335 (N.D. Illinois, 1989); Schwarz v. Schwarz, 27 Ill.2d 140, 188 N.E.2d 673 (1963); Dunham v. Dunham, 162 Ill. 614 (1896); Skelly Oil v. Universal Oil Products Co., 338 Ill.App.79, 87 (1st Dist. 1949).

8. Consequently, all the officers of the court, including judges and attorneys that committed fraud upon the various courts, state and federal, are personally liable to the victims for damages.

9. I urge my fellow victims in similar situations to fight back because VOID Orders/Judgments must be set aside:

(1) A “void” judgment, as we all know, grounds no rights, forms no defense to actions taken thereunder, and is vulnerable to any manner of collateral attack (thus here, by). No statute of limitations or repose runs on its holdings, the matters thought to be settled thereby are not res judicata, and years later, when the memories may have grown dim and rights long been regarded as vested, any disgruntled litigant may reopen old wound and once more probe its depths. And it is then as though trial and adjudication had never been. Fritts v. Krugh, Supreme Court of Michigan, 92 N.W.2d 604, 354 Mich. 97 (10/13/58).

(2) Void order which is one entered by court which lacks jurisdiction over parties or subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter judgment, or order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that party is properly before court, People ex. re. Brzica v. Village of Lake Barrington, 644 N.E.2d 66 (Ill.App.2 Dist. 1994).

%d bloggers like this: