2012
05.31

I have 2 days left with my Trial, unfortunately I will not be buying the program. I would recommend it, however the intrusion onto my computer is a targeted intrusion (see other post)It has been unable to run properly and consistently.

The program has aided in revealing the files involved in the intrusion.
Immunet revealed and quarantined 21 Rootkits, and detected the same files when they reappeared days later.
Immunet repeatedly indicated that the Computer had not been scanned.
The updates were checked daily, however after the first few days they seemed to have been removed or lost. Checking again often brought the same updates.

To fix my computer, I would need programs which can do the following:
1. Detect, remove and prevent reinstallation of a Rootkit which loads on a Virtual Disk into Virtual memory.
2. Repair the Security for every level as the Group Policy and other policies have been circumvented.
3. Audit and Repair the Certificates.
4. Secure and prevent holes in Computer Management and Event reports.
5. SFC does not complete, it gets to 48% and fails. There are issues with the usual suspect programs, where the code has been added to existing .dll’s.
6. A method to harden the Registry and prevent hidden entries, and encoded entries which redirect browsers and obstruct Search Engines.
7. A way to audit to assure that all Updates are installed properly and HAVE NOT BEEN COMPROMISED.
8. A way to prevent ANY remote access to the computer through stealth shells or terminal programs.
9. A way to prevent ANY hidden Virtual Drives from being created.
10. A way to repair the MBR, without their failsafe program requiring a reinstallation using the original backup discs which have been compromised. Any cd or dvd which has ever been placed in any of my computers has been compromised – they reinstall the triggers for the intrusion to reinstall. (This has backfired because they no longer can remove themselves from the situation, and hide and deny deny deny. Their intrusion reinstalls itself. Try as they might to cover up their crime, their persistent programming just won’t allow it.

The program which was initially ILLEGALLY installed on my computers was WebWatcher by Awareness Technologies. That installation took place in February 2007. Since then the program has been improved based on the actions I have taken to expose and circumvent it. After countless rebuilds of my computers, I have had no choice but to accept the intrusion as a part of regular computing. There is no escaping a targeted intrusion. In all liklihood the current intrusion is through a different program from a different companty.

I’ll say this for the IMMUNET program, it functioned better and longer than the other major AVAS programs. Like Kaspersky, it showed the activity but was unable to prevent reinstallation… at some point those Activity Notices start to feel like taunts and it is no longer necessary.

A surprise was that they did not attempt to Junction or Symbolic Link the program into a loop which would not finish and alolow quarantine. This had been the downfall of each Kaspersky installation.

For some reason, the information about the Anti-Spyware Coalition, ATMOST and NSS suddenly became available. I am still trying to read up on what happened to the organization/s because Awareness Technologies was a part of the ASC. When they packaged the virus into the first version of WebWatcher, they were given a free pass from the AVAS programs affiliated with ASC. In light of my experience that enabled my terror and harassment to continue unchecked and unaided, and gave the intruders the ability to obsfuscate, redirect, block, and fully remote control my computers and my life. (See the damage: http://www.work2bdone.com/live)

My THANKS to Immunet for the program and the information it provided.

2012
05.29

When someone hires the Private Investigator who does the illegal work for the county WITH IMPUNITY, they should not inherit the impunity of the investigator.

BUT, in Montgomery County, they do.

They inherit all of the benefits that come with it. Complete impunity, ability to leverage that impunity to corrupt the judiciary, impunity to violate the law, and ability to prevent any investigation or prosecution from a local level all the way up to the FBI.

When the private investigator is former FBI, they get a pass from any federal investigation.

NO ONE STOPS THEM… and there you have it. The continued destruction of ONE MAN, HIS FAMILY, HIS FRIENDS, HIS CAREER, HIS LIFE.

My web site contains about a third of the terror I have experienced… and the web site overwhelms readers… imagine living it.

2012
05.18

I have experienced a targeted intrusion onto my computers for the last 5 years. There has been no effective escape.

This is not a random intrusion. I have been targeted by a private investigator, as that private investigator works with local law enforcement, there has been no assistance, investigation or prosecution for the intrusion/remotes control/surveillance/redirection.

Initially it started as WebWatcher by Awareness Technologies. I still have the appcompat file which they installed through windows mail in an email which did NOT need to be opened. The software deployed as soon as the email was delivered to the machine.

Since that time I have watched them update their program as they watched me expose it. There is no way to prevent a targeted installation such as this. They have the power to filter the web, and to disable avas programs. I have watched them disable all of the major programs. It seems the simplest method has been to install a junction or symbolic link which prevents a scan from ever completing.

The programs have been exposed on Linux, and Windows installations. Again, I have watched the installation programs download with me powerless to prevent it. I have attempted to work with it however the ability to control email and web access has made it necessary to confirm any information I receive. They are using me as their R&D department and updating their programs to circumvent/prevent my actions from being successful.

The current version runs from a BIOS initiation, creating a virtual disk from whioh to load the program. As it them runs from virtual memory it has been difficult to nail down. But the clues are there that i am running a version of windows inside their window. Basically there are hardware issues which cannot be addressed while stuck in their window.

Numerous programs have indicated the presence of the surveillance/remote control/filtering program, but none can remove it. At best, I have watched protection work for a few hours, maybe a few days, and then become useless.

I have been lucky only because when I detected the initial intrusion in 2007, I pulled all hard disks from all computers. This has prevented them from placing incriminating files on my computer and then accusing me of responsibility for them. I immediately recognized the possibility/probability of this type of action.

You may be asking WHY? The initial install was by my wife, on my business computers as she planned a divorce. Once detected she and her lawyer hired the private investigator to cover the federal crime. The private investigator is former FBI and works directly with the county managing their informant program and also surveillance (without search warrants). This involvement with law enforcement has prevented law enforcement from taking any action, as they risk exposing their own methods.

I have tried everything I can think of. 20+ years in IT and I have used everything I ever learned about computers and Internet and IP tracking.

Do you have any advice? I am under constant assault by the attorneys who have manipulated law enforcement into inaction. The lawyers have done the same with the courts. Once one judge was manipulated, 8 subsequent judges in the divorce have been forced to further the injustice in violation of laws and procedures. Most of the legal battle is documented on www.work2bdone.com/live It’s not a whining divorce site. It documents a terroristic high tech divorce which has destroyed a family for going on 6 years.

Whenever I am attempting to assemble a petition for the court which will expose the actions/injustice/corruption, I am served with more ridiculous and frivolous actions from my wife’s attorney designed to just create chaos. This has been the case since the initial intrusion was proven in July 2007. They have also used their surveillance information to have judges recuse without the petition requesting it even being filed. When anything else fails, the lawyers expose the judges unethical conversations with them and gain more impunity for themselves and further injustice for me.

Any Help or advice would b greatly appreciated. If you do contact me, i assure you I will respond. Remember, they control the computers. They also control the cell phone. Effective communication has not been easy. But here are work arounds, and once initial contact is made, they do not interfere as much.

Please help. Your comments on this post are reviewed and never posted to the web site.

2012
05.12

Taken from THE MORNING CALL April 18, 2012

It also was reported Saturday that the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association wants to expand unwarranted blanket searches in the form of electronic eavesdropping. “To do nothing is not an option,” said Montgomery County DA Risa Ferman.

Yes, that’s exactly how George III felt; authorities must be allowed ever-increasing power to intrude and to dominate our lives.

Note to Risa Ferman: If you are looking to expand your unwarranted surveillance program begin by investigating the failures of your organization to behavior lawfully in their current practices.

1) The technology intrusions which have harassed and destroyed my professional and personal life have been ignored by your organization. WHY?

2) The information stolen from my computer has been delivered to judges who were able to recuse before being asked to recuse?

3) It is astounding to recognize that your organization has at no time decided to act responsibly? Do you intend to terrorize and harass until someone is dead?

To do nothing is not an option, BUT IT HAS BEEN THE CHOICE YOU HAVE MADE IN IGNORING THE MANIPULATION AND CORRUPTION OCCURRING IN THE BUILDING YOU WORK IN SINCE YOU TOOK OFFICE.

Your illegal and unethical surveillance program has demonstrated it’s power…. the power to destroy… the power to hide… the power to attack… the power to avoid prosecution… the power to protect itself at all costs.

What crime is it that I am supposed to have committed that has warranted the intrusion? Or am I supposed to ignore the private investigator that your organization refuses to prosecute? How can I ignore the fact that I am being harassed and terrorized when they won’t stop? If they stop, they won’t be able to control my information and communications. They risk being exposed, SO THEY WON’T STOP. And I have no other alternative but to persevere and await the day their actions are exposed.

There is no way to stop a targeted intrusion. When law enforcement is ignoring the crimes because they are partially liable for creating the situation it is irresponsible and corrupt. IT IS EVIL. TO DO NOTHING IS NOT AN OPTION… I have no choice… Risa Ferman has a choice. She chose to do nothing. And has allowed this to envelope more and more county personnel and resources.

The investigator who stopped advertising his internet business? the one who advertised that lawyers need his services to spy on other lawyers? the one who advertised his ethical hacking? Ethical hacking for illegal purposes?

2012
05.07

The Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas has demonstrated their abuse of power since 2007. When might the law apply?

I am anticipating that the law may apply once the case is moved to another court.

The surprising thing is that ANY COURT in the land is empowered to void the orders of the Montgomery County Court. There is also no deadline for designating an order is void…. because the order is ALREADY void because of the corrupt actions of the court.

In my case, the fact that I had notified the court of the defect in the order and requested a hearing within the 30 day period removes the question of whether the document was submitted timely. The fact that the Court further ignored the petition before the court and held no hearing on the matter before dismissing the petition reaffirms that I was trying to accomplish raising the matters on a timely basis, BUT THE COURT WAS REFUSING TO COOPERATE.

The law doesn’t say that the Court has to cooperate within the 30 Days. It simply states that the petition must be filed with the court and served on the parties.

BTW, Whoever is running the Prothonotary might want to look into the missing documents, and the ones which are improperly titled to mislead that the Appeal was denied by the Superior Court. THAT did not happen. The order from the Superior Court indicated that they could not force the lower court to hold a hearing. The court woul dhave to hold the hearing on the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, OR I could petition the Supreme COurt of Pennsylvania for a Writ Of Mandamus to compel the Court to hold the appropriate hearing. (And if we are going to go all Mandamus, I can assure you that the request will be made to recuse the entire Montgomery County Bench from this matter.)


The law is very consistent accurate on this topic. When a judge fails to follow due process and procedure, the judge does not have jurisdiction to issue an order on the matter.

In my case, when advised of the defect in her Order which would void the order, Judge Carolyn Carluccio proceeded to indicate that she did not have jurisdiction – REPEATEDLY, INCORRECTLY AND ON THE RECORD. Repeating that she did not have jurisdiction to void her own defective and void order. She would further issue orders and sanctions against me based on the void order – that she knows is void. She also knows she is committing EXTRINSIC FRAUD – repeatedly and on the record, in attempting to deny my rights and convince me that it it proper.

Judge Carolyn Carluccio would also prevent the matter from proceeding to the Superior Court so that an Appeal could be heard.

Judge Carolyn Carluccio was determined to commit as much fraud, ethical violations and crimes in the attempt to destroy my life, leaving me homeless and destitute after surviving 6 years of injustice and corruption. She did so knowing she would have judicial immunity and not face civil liability.

While judicial immunity does permit her to terrorize any litigant in her court and escape civil damages…
JUDICIAL IMMUNITY DOES NOT EXTEND TO THE COUNTY… nor to the minions who have worked to conceal the judge’s crimes.

The same judicial immunity extends to Judge DelRicci, Judge Bertin, Judge Coonahan, Judge Barrett, Judge Daniele, Judge Tilson.
BUT THEIR JUDICIAL IMMUNITY DOES NOT EXTEND TO THE COUNTY… … nor to the minions who have worked to conceal the judges’ crimes.

AND of course, the judges violated the constitution, and the laws and procedures of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for which they should face criminal prosecution. When a judge commits a crime, it is still a crime. They may not be liable for civil damages, but they are NOT excused from criminal prosecution.

And what litigant is going to place their trust in a judiciary which is more criminal than the cases they hear.

Void judgment. One which has has no legal force or effect, invalidity of which may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place directly or collaterally. Reynolds v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1087, 1092. One which from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. Judgment is a “void judgment” if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process. Klugh v. U.S., D.C.S.C., 610 F.Supp. 892, 901. See also Voidable judgment.

2012
05.06

Void judgment. One which has has no legal force or effect, invalidity of which may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place directly or collaterally. Reynolds v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1087, 1092. One which from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. Judgment is a “void judgment” if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process. Klugh v. U.S., D.C.S.C., 610 F.Supp. 892, 901. See also Voidable judgment.

Other Authorities on Void Judgments:

Void judgments are those rendered by a court which lacked jurisdiction, either of the subject matter or the parties. See:

Wahl v. Round Valley Bank, 38 Ariz. 411, 300 P.955 (1931) Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. Otterson, 16 Ariz. 305, 146 P. 203 (1914) Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 2d 278 (1940)

A void judgment which includes judgment entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, or an order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court. See Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182 F.3d 548 (C.A. 7 Ill. 1999)

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect. See Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 27, 453 F.2d 645, 14 A.L.R. Fed. 298 (C.A. 1 Mass. 1972)

A void judgment is one which from the beginning was complete nullity and without any legal effect. See Hobbs v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 485 F.Supp. 456 (M.D. Fla. 1980).

Void judgment is one that, from its inception, is complete nullity and without legal effect. Holstein v. City of Chicago, 803 F.Supp. 205, reconsideration denied 149 F.R.D. 147, affirmed 29 F.3d 1145 (N.D. Ill. 1992).

Void judgment is one where court lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or entry of order violated due process, U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5-Triad Energy Corp. v. McNell, 110 F.R.D. 382 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).

Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, Fed Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28 U.S.C.A.; U.S.C.A. Const Amend. 5. Klugh v. U.S., 620 F.Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect, Rubin v. Johns, 109 F.R.D. 174 (D. Virgin Islands 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind the parties or to support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of enforcement in any manner or to any degree. Loyd v. Director, Dept. of Public Safety, 480 So.2d 577 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985). A judgment shown by evidence to be invalid for want of jurisdiction is a void judgment or at all events has all attributes of a void judgment, City of Los Angeles v. Morgan, 234 P.2d 319 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 1951).

Void judgment which is subject to collateral attack, is simulated judgment devoid of any potency because of jurisdictional defects, Ward. v. Terriere, 386 P.2d 352 (Colo. 1963). A void judgment is a simulated judgment devoid of any potency because of jurisdictional defects only, in the court rendering it and defect of jurisdiction may relate to a party or parties, the subject matter, the cause of action, the question to be determined, or relief to be granted, Davidson Chevrolet, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 330 P.2d 1116, certiorari denied 79 S.Ct. 609, 359 U.S. 926, 3 L.Ed. 2d 629 (Colo. 1958).

Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdiction of parties or subject matter or that lacks inherent power to make or enter particular order involved and such a judgment may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally, People v. Wade, 506 N.W.2d 954 (Ill. 1987).

Void judgment may be defined as one in which rendering court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, lacked personal jurisdiction, or acted in manner inconsistent with due process of law Eckel v. MacNeal, 628 N.E.2d 741 (Ill. App.Dist. 1993).

Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdiction of parties or subject matter or that lacks inherent power to make or enter particular order involved; such judgment may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally People v. Sales, 551 N.E.2d 1359 (Ill.App. 2 Dist. 1990).

Res judicata consequences will not be applied to a void judgment which is one which, from its inception, is a complete nullity and without legal effect, Allcock v. Allcock, 437 N.E.2d 392 (Ill.App.3 Dist. 1982).

Void judgment is one which, from its inception is complete nullity and without legal effect In re Marriage of Parks, 630 N.E.2d 509 (Ill.App. 5 Dist. 1994).

Void judgment is one entered by court that lacks the inherent power to make or enter the particular order involved, and it may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally; such a judgment would be a nullity. People v. Rolland, 581 N.E.2d 907 (Ill.APp. 4 Dist. 1991).

Void judgment under federal law is one in which rendering court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over dispute or jurisdiction over parties or acted in manner inconsistent with due process of law or otherwise acted unconstitutionally in entering judgment, U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5, Hays v. Louisiana Dock Co., 452 N.E.2d 1383 (Ill App. 5 Dist. 1983).

A void judgment has no effect whatsoever and is incapable of confirmation or ratification, Lucas v. Estate of Stavos, 609 N.E.2d 1114, rehearing denied, and transfer denied (Ind. App. 1 Dist. 1993).

Void judgment is one that from its inception is a complete nullity and without legal effect Stidham v. Whelchel, 698 N.E.2d 1152 (Ind. 1998).

Relief from void judgment is available when trial court lacked either personal or subject matter jurisdiction, Dusenberry v. Dusenberry, 625 N.E.2d 458 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. 1993).

Void judgment is one rendered by court which lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or acted in manner inconsistent with due process, U.S.C.A. Const. Amends. 5, 14, Matter of Marriage of Hampshire, 896 P.2d 58 (Kan.1997)

Judgment is void if court that rendered it lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction; void judgment is nullity and may be vacated at any time, Matter of Marriage of Welliver, 869 P.2d 653 (Kan. 1994).

A void judgment is one rendered by a a court which lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, In re. Estate of Wells, 983 P.2d 279, (Kan.App. 1999).

Void judgment is one rendered in absence of jurisdiction over subject matter or parties, 310 N.W.2d 502, (Minn. 1981).

A void judgment is one rendered in absence of jurisdiction over subject matter or parties, Lange v. Johnson, 204 N.W.2d 205 (Minn. 1973).

A void judgment is one which has merely semblance, without some essential element, as when court purporting to render it has no jurisdiction, Mills v. Richardson, 81S.E.2d 409 (N.C. 1954).

A void judgment is one which has a mere semblance, but is lacking in some of the essential elements which would authorize the court to proceed to judgment, Henderson v. Henderson, 59 S.E.2d 227, (N.C. 1950).

Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdiction to enter such judgment, State v. Blankenship, 675 N.E.2d 1303, (Ohio App. 9 Dist. 1996).

Void judgment, such as may be vacated at any time is one whose invalidity appears on face of judgment roll, Graff v. Kelly, 814 P.2d 489 (Okl. 1991).

A void judgment is one that is void on face of judgment roll, Capital Federal Savings Bank v. Bewley, 795 P.2d 1051 (Okl. 1990).

Where condition of bail bond was that defendant would appear at present term of court, judgment forfeiting bond for defendant’s bail to appear at subsequent term was a void judgment within rule that laches does not run against a void judgment, Com. V. Miller, 150 A.2d 585 (Pa.Super. 1959).

A void judgment is one in which the judgment is facially invalid because the court lacked jurisdiction or authority to render the judgment, State v. Richie, 20 S.W.3d 624 (Tenn. 2000).

Void judgment is one which shows upon face of record want of jurisdiction in court assuming to render judgment, and want of jurisdiction may be either of persons, subject matter generally, particular question to be decided or relief assumed to be given, State ex re. Dawson v. Bomar, 354 S.W.2d 763, certiorari denied, (Tenn. 1962).

A void judgment is one which shows upon face of record a want of jurisdiction in court assuming to render judgment, Underwood v. Brown, 244 S.W.2d 168 (Tenn. 1951).

Void judgment is one which has no legal force or effect whatever, it is an absolute nullity, its invalidity may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place and it need not be attacked directly but may be attacked collaterally whenever and wherever it is interposed, City of Lufkin v. McVicker, 510 S.X.2d 141 (Twx.Civ.App.-Beaumone 1973).

A void judgment, insofar as it purports to be pronouncement of court, is an absolute nullity, Thompson v. Thompson, 238 S.W.2d 218 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1951).

A void judgment is one that has bee procured by extrinsic or collateral fraud, or entered by court that did not have jurisdiction over subject matter or the parties, Rook v. Rook, 353 S.E. 2d 756 (Va. 1987).

A void judgment is a judgment, decree, or order entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction of the parties or of the subject matter, or which lacks the inherent power to make or enter the particular order involved, State ex re. Turner v. Briggs, 971 P.2d 581 (Wash.App.Div. 1999).

A void judgment or order is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order or judgment, or where the order was procured by fraud, In re Adoption of E.L., 733 N.E.2d 846, (Ill. APp. 1 Dist. 2000).

Void judgments are those rendered by court which lacked jurisdiction, either of subject matter or parties, Cockerham. v. Zikratch, 619 P.2d 739 (Ariz. 1980).

Void judgments generally fall into two classifications, that is, judgments where there is want of jurisdiction of person or subject matter, and judgments procured through fraud, and such judgments may be attacked directly or collaterially, Irving v. Rodriquez, 169 N.E.2d 145, (Ill. app. 2 Dis. 1960).

Invalidity needs to appear on face of judgment alone that judgment or order may be said to be intrinsically void or void on its face, if lack of jurisdiction appears from the record, Cockett Oil Co. v. Effie, 374 S.W.2d 154 (Mo.App. 1964).

Decision is void on the face of the judgment roll when form four corners of that roll, it may be determined that at least on of three elements of jurisdiction was absent: (1) jurisdiction over parties, (2) jurisdiction over subject matter, or (3) jurisdictional power to pronounce particular judgment hat was rendered, B & C Investments, INc. v. F & M Nat. Bank & Trust, 903 P.2d 339 (Okla.App.Div 3, 1995).

Void order may be attacked, either directly or collaterally, at any time, In Re Estate of Steinfield, 630 N.E.2d 801, certiorari denied, See also Steinfeld v. Hoddick, 513 U.S. 809 (Ill. 1994).

Void order which is one entered by court which lacks jurisdiction over parties or subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter judgment, or order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that party is properly before court, People ex. re. Brzica v. Village of Lake Barrington, 644 N.E.2d 66 (Ill.App.2 Dist. 1994).

While voidable orders are readily appealable and must be attacked directly, void order may be circumvented by collateral attack or remedied by mandamus, Sachez v. Hester, 911 S.W.2d 173, (Tex.App. -Corpus Christi 1995).

Arizona courts give great weight to federal courts’ interpretations of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure governing motion for releif from judgment in interpreting identical text of Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure, Estate of Page v. Litzenburg, 852 P.2d 128, review denied (Ariz.App.Div. 1, 1998).

When rule providing for relief from void judgments is applicable, relief is not discretionary matter, but is mandatory, Orner. V. Shalala, 30 F.3d 1307 (Colo. 1994).

Judgments entered where court lacked either subject matter or personal jurisdiction, or that were otherwise entered in violation of due process of law, must be set aside, Jaffe and Asher v. Van Brunt, S.D.N.Y.1994, 158 F.R.D. 278.

A “void” judgment, as we all know, grounds no rights, forms no defense to actions taken thereunder, and is vulnerable to any manner of collateral attack (thus here, by). No statute of limitations or repose runs on its holdings, the matters thought to be settled thereby are not res judicata, and years later, when the memories may have grown dim and rights long been regarded as vested, any disgruntled litigant may reopen old wound and once more probe its depths. And it is then as though trial and adjudication had never been. Fritts v. Krugh, Supreme Court of Michigan, 92 N.W.2d 604, 354 Mich. 97 (10/13/58).

On certiorari this Court may not review questions of fact. Brown v. Blanchard, 39 Mich. 790. It is not at liberty to determine disputed facts (Hyde v. Nelson, 11 Mich 353), nor to review the weight of the evidence. Linn v. Roberts, 5 Mich 443; Lunch v. People, 16 Mich 472. Certiorari is an appropriate remedy to get rid of a void judgment, one which there is no evidence to sustain. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Hunt, 39 Mich 469.

2012
05.03

The Fraud and Malice of the Court is clearly documented and demonstrates that THEY WILL NOT ALLOW IT TO EVER END. The documents are docketed. The proof of the terroristic intention of the court is in their own documentation.

There is no getting over it…
There is no moving beyond it…
There is no ending to it…
There is no escaping it… THEY HAVE NEVER INTENDED THAT TO BE AN OPTION. The Court has ordered that there be no end to this matter. Not without further hearings. And the court will not schedule those hearings. And the court will not permit an Appeal to move forward. AND THE COURT WILL CONTINUE TO ABUSE IT’S POWER TO FURTHER INTRUDE VIA TECHNOLOGY AND DENY MY LIFE.

The intention of the court has been to destroy a man to the point of suicide. But, I wouldn’t oblige them.

The inaction of law enforcement is an endorsement of the Court’s fraud and malice.
The inaction of the Judicial Conduct Board is an endorsement of the Court’s fraud and malice.
The inaction of the County Sheriff is an endorsement of the Court’s fraud and malice.
The inaction of the Attorney General is an endorsement of the Court’s fraud and malice.

The action of Federal Authorities is indicative of a protracted investigation into the matter. There is no reason to believe that Federal Authorities would ignore, endorse and sanction this level of corruption and abuse of power. Federal Authorities are still in Luzerne County. Every illegal action they discover in Luzerne is also happening in Montgomery… and all of them have happened in this case. The indictments have started in Luzerne County.

The Court issued an order which extends in perpetuity.

That order was issued based on a Petition filed moments before a hearing on another matter.

Carolyn Carluccio repeatedly indicated the purpose of the hearing preventing any testimony by the Defendant which was not directly related to the single issue.

Carolyn Carluccio repeatedly denied any objections for relevance as the Plaintiff proceeded to testify regarding the freshly submitted petition.

Carolyn Carluccio then went on to fraudulently indicate that hearings had been held on all matters.

The New Order was based on the fraudulent and defective Orders which were being prevented from Appeal by Carolyn Carluccio. Preventing any resolution of any matter has been a standard established since the initial deception in August 2007 by Rhonda Daniele.

But this Order goes on in perpetuity… and prevents any recovery without resolution of the matter. It prevents the Defendant from having any life until the matters are resolved.

The fraudulent and malicious order demonstrates the clear intent to terrorize the Defendant who survived 6 years of injustice and corruption.

And to ensure that there would never be another hearing, the Plaintiff withdrew the last minute petition on the next day. Of course, otherwise there might have been a hearing… and Carolyn Carluccio had already issued an order on the matter WITHOUT A HEARING. Any hearing would further expose the direct involvment of Carolyn Carluccio in the fraud and conspiracy.

Carolyn Carluccio is trying to acheive the destruction of a Defendant who has refused to commit suicide after his life has been destroyed without any hope of any future. Any hearings would only provide him the opportunity to present the facts which are all in the courts own documents. Carolyn Carluccio will keep nesting her fraud within the prior frauds where she is preveting any Appeal from moving forward.

If there was no legal basis for the Appeal, they would have allowed the Superior Court the opportunity to deny the Appeal. Carolyn Carluccio knows she is wrong. She lies in her Orders. She lies in her Opinions. She is a disgrace to the judiciary. She is a disgrace to humanity. She hides behind the robes and destroys lives. She won’t permit any escape from her corrupt court.

There is no escaping the terroristic corruption and abuse of power in the Montgomery County Court. And there is no surviving it… and that is exactly what the court intends… to terrorize and attack me for the rest of my life.

There is no future without resolution. There can be no resolution without exposing the injustice and corruption. I am left with no other choice but to persevere until someone finally exposes the crimes of the judges and prosecutes them for the terror they have caused.

Carolyn Carluccio has provided an instrument for destruction which can be used in perpetuity… which if not addressesd will continue in perpetuity… which she has issued based on fraud… which fraud was based on prior frauds.. which she will not permit to be addressed. The Order remains a threat against any future… and a fraud which the court refuses to address or resolve.

For some reason, the documents I filed with the court clearly document the growing conspiracy and fraud. Documents which have been IGNORED by the court that continued the injustice, and which documented the abuse of power of a judiciary intent on the destruction of a man who refuses to commit suicide.

%d bloggers like this: