2011
03.29

After surviving over 5 years of harassment and terror… and I have one thing yet to learn. Where to find help. I do know the only available exit is my death or their prosecution.

Hate crimes happen and no one cares until someone is dead. They fake caring for a few days, and await the next death. I can only pray I am next, and it is swift. Murder is too qiuck, They wouldn’t enjoy it. Slow terror and torment via injustice.

Because no one cares about my little disappointments.

But when I am gone, my children get the burden, and the attackers will turn towards them. Because they might have an interest someday, and a case for what they know happened to their father, at the hands of their mother, the lawyers, the police, the judges, the detectives, the security companies… All those people who are suppose to make you feel safe, they destroyed the man.

2011
03.28

ACLU: Mississippi’s drug enforcement tactics amount to a ‘reign of terror’
By Eric W. Dolan
Monday, March 28th, 2011 — 10:14 pm

Harsh sentencing policies and the use of confidential informants has created a racially discriminatory criminal justice system in Mississippi that harms innocent individuals and erodes the rule of law, according to a report released Monday by the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Mississippi.

Mississippi’s drug laws force judges to abide by a harsh set of mandatory minimum sentences for people convicted of nonviolent drug crimes and allow for extraordinarily high maximum sentences. Data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics showed that the average state prison sentence for drug sales in the United States was 5.7 years, compared to the current average of 10.4 years in Mississippi. Similarly, for drug possession, the average prison sentence was 4.5 years, compared to 7.2 years in Mississippi.

In addition, black Mississippians are three times more likely than whites to go to prison on drug charges, despite the fact that both groups use drugs at virtually identical rates.

“Excessive reliance on imprisonment in Mississippi’s drug policy is wrongheaded and wasteful, senselessly incarcerating those who do not belong behind bars, at significant taxpayer expense,” the ACLU’s report said. “Public safety and the rule of law would be better served through a health-based solution that provides treatment and counseling to low-level drug offenders — replacing spiteful punishment with reasoned rehabilitation that furthers the best interests of both offenders and society at large.”

Federal funding for state and local agencies encourages the mass arrest of low-level perpetrators, according to the report, because it simply rewards every arrest for a drug-related crime, regardless of the impact on crime rates or pubic safety.

“Logically flawed, this ‘numbers game’ approach to law enforcement is especially irrational and destructive in the context of drug policing, where there exist essentially limitless quantities of arrestable drug users as well as prospective dealers eager to fill the shoes and take the business of those arrested,” the report stated.

The “numbers game” approach has fueled the use of confidential informants, which law enforcement claim are necessary for identifying those who commit crimes. Rather than target high-level drug dealers, law enforcement typically arrest large quantities of small-time offenders, who accept plea bargains and become informants to avoid facing Mississippi’s harsh sentencing statutes.

“This is a vicious cycle, and, barring a change in policy, it will continue to ensnare an exponentially growing number of Mississippians,” the report warned. “The widespread recruitment of community members as informants, coupled with aggressive police tactics and excessive sentencing policies, results in a ‘police state’ atmosphere that should not be tolerated anywhere in America, and that must not be tolerated in Mississippi.”

In a statement released with the report, Executive Director of the ACLU of Mississippi Nsombi Lambright said there was an “urgent need to reform the policies that govern the drug enforcement system as a whole in Mississippi.”

2011
03.22

Jamie Kronic. (or JAIME KRONIC )

In 2007, Jamie worked for Awareness Technologies and confirmed the method used to illegally install their software on my computers…. Jamie also confirmed other items.

This was done in exchange for the method I used to detect and confirm their program was installed and running on my computer.

I heard months later she was fired just after that call.

Jamie Kronic was the only honest and responsible person at Awareness Technologies. She heard the devastation being caused by their illegally installed program on my family.

Jamie, if you read this, please contact law enforcement. They are still attacking.

2011
03.22

In December 2007, I sought a Protection From Abuse Order to stop the computer and phone harassment. The following documents were included with the PFA Request.

Two weekes later, Judge Tilson cancelled the PFA Order indicating that Pennsylvania Law was not ready for 1984. (Yes, it was 2008. Over 20 years later. )

Now in March 2011, I stand by every allegation and statement still… and the proof has become even clearer.

Allegations
Computer Surveillance
Landline Phone Tap
Cell Phone Surveillance
Accoustic Harassment
Affects of Harassment
Summary

The last line in the Summary document shouts out loudly from the past:

The entire process has effectively destroyed me personally, professionally and financially and prevents any future recovery.

I wrote that in December 2007. I was right. The only difference is now, 4 years later, I include ’emotionally’ in the list and I have been so close to suicide so many times.



**U**P**D**A**T**E**

In the land line phone tap document, I mention downloading a document. The PDF was titled DCS-1300. I thought it was a phone switch model number (Digital Communications Switch). I had searched the web for the exact statement made by the machine when it answered the phone number which kept appearing. I found out later that the document was for the FBI Digital Collection System.

THAT MAY EXPLAIN WHY SOMEONE IMMEDIATELY CALLED ME AFTER I DOWNLOADED THE FILE TO THROW ME OFF. I HAD DOWNLOADED THE INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR THE FBI’s COMPUTER AND CELL PHONE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM. The ringbacks that clued me in to the surveillance also stopped.

ADDITIONALLY… When I switched to ONEBILL with Verizon. They combined my Verizon Wireless Bill with my Verizon (landline) bill… it would seem their program accidentally charged ME for the surveillance charge. Making my bill about $700 higher than it should have been. BUT, NEITHER VERIZON NOR VERIZON WIRELESS COULD EXPLAIN THE CHARGE OR JUSTIFY THE REMOVAL OF THE CHARGE WITHOUT EXPOSING THE SURVEILLANCE. So no matter how many times they pointed me to the other side of Verizon AND no matter how many hours I spent on the phone with them, there was no way to resolve the issue.

The Cell Phone surveillance was reported to FBI and Secret Service. No Action. Each subsequent cell phone has been hacked, I watched for the cell phone behaving differently. The most extreme time was when the protective plastic cover for the screen, somehow returned to the phone. I had removed it weeks earlier, yet there it was again? NOW HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT HAPPENING? Perhaps the person who swapped out the phone forgot to remove it. He disappeared and I have not seen him since that day.

The logo I mention which appeared in multiple places inside the program code and suddenly on the phone once hacked. It was the BlueTooth logo. Bluetooth was still new technology. Bluetooth allowed them to talk to their other surveillance devices in the house. Having control of my phone allowed them access to computers and other devices…. like remote cameras and cable television boxes (Cable Boxes had an large number of active MAC addresses.)

The Accoustic Noise. Well, I confirmed that it was controlled by remote control. It would seem that they could turn it up as needed. The noise stopped after a visit by Police. When they were leaving they asked if there was anythign they could do to help. I said “Yes, advise Cheif Brady that when I detected the private investigator harassing actions 3 years ago (August 2007), wasn’t he supposed to back off?” Well, the private investigator hasn’t. I’ve been tortured and terrorized by him for the last several years.” In what many would suggest is a coincidence, the noise stopped the next day.

It did return during January 2011 for a few weeks. Only to stop again in February after I went to Police to report the civil rights violation by Judge Rhonda Daniele… and the other judges. At that time I also gave the police the name of the company I beleived to be the private investigators. A company known as Foresight Investigations… which incidentally was formerly known as RETIRED FBI AGENTS.

.

2011
03.22

Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or U.S. laws. This law, commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute, gives the Department of Justice authority to seek civil remedies in cases where law enforcement agencies have policies or practices that foster a pattern of misconduct by employees. This action is directed against an agency, not against individual officers. The types of issues which may initiate a pattern and practice investigation include:

?Lack of supervision/monitoring of officers’ actions;
?Lack of justification or reporting by officers on incidents involving the use of force;
?Lack of, or improper training of, officers; and
?Citizen complaint processes that treat complainants as adversaries.

2011
03.22

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights

This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).

It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.

2011
03.22

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.

This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race.

Acts under “color of any law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under “color of any law,” the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

2011
03.22

At the direction of the Agent in Philadelphia, I contacted the FBI in Washington DC this morning.

The person who answered the phone in Washington told me I needed to contact the Philadelphia office.

When I told him I was instructed to call Washington by the Agent in Philadelphia, he became rude. Not just kind of subtle rude. Arrogant rude. As the gatekeeper, no call was going to get past him rude.

I explained to him that I had spoken to the Agent on March 11, and had visited the FBI office in Philadelphia on March 17.
He instructed me to call the Philadelphia office.

He gave me the number for the Philadelphia office and hung up.

Once again, dealing with the insanity of trying to get past a telephone operator or secretary acting as gatekeeper. Frustration and madness.

2011
03.17

Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
~ John Adams

2011
03.17

Following up on my phone report from last week, I took the following documents down to the FBI. My mother and I met with an agent for almost an hour. Discussion included civil rights violations and the terror experiences documented on the web site.

Dec 19, 2008 Request for Explanation of Ex Parte Rulings and communications
Dec 19, 2008 Request for Explanation of Ex Parte Ruling
Dec 19, 2008 Letter to President Judge re: Conciliation Report
Jul 6, 2009 Transcript: Recusal of Judge Del Ricci
Jul 6, 2009 Annotated Copy of The Transcript: Recusal of Judge Del Ricci
Jul 14, 2009 Emergency Petition for Modification of Custody
Aug 24, 2010 Notice of Discovery of Ex Parte Orders Dated August 22, 2007
Sep 14, 2010 Petition Regarding Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Communications
Sep 14, 2010 Petition Regarding Discrepancies/Errors on Invoice for Fees
Nov 8, 2010 Request for Recusal of Judge Stephen Barrett
Dec 22, 2010 Motion for the Production of Document
Dec 22, 2010 Motion for the Production of Documents
Mar 8, 2011 Response to Plaintiff’s Emergency Contempt Petition of February 24, 2011 and Counterpetition
Mar 16, 2011 Petition for the Recusal of Judge Carolyn Tornetta Carluccio for Conspiracy, Corruption, Fraud, Intimidation, Conflict of Interest and Denial of Due Process/Procedure and Denial of Civil Rights

After the meeting, we went for a walk around Independance Hall ( currently under scaffolding ) and stopped to see the Liberty Bell.

%d bloggers like this: