2010
08.23

Elsewhere in the blog, the letter (December 2008) from Judge Hodson in response to my letter pointing out the EXTREME failure of the conciliator’s conference report filed by Sara Goren which did not include ANYTHING presented by me.

In light of the discovery of the Court’s August 2007 Ex Parte Order and evidence of the conspiracy to conceal it, his response becomes arrogant, grossly naive and totally irresponsible.

“The Court does not exercise disciplinary measures against a Court official because one party disagrees with credibility determinations made by said Court official. The system would be chaos if I were to adopt that approach.”

CREDIBILITY DETERMINATIONS… ???
Judge Hodson, what does the discovery of this improper order and the conspiracy indicate about the credibility of The Court?

Judge Hodson, when you summarily ignore a valid report of a serious allegation without any consideration, under what circumstance would YOU exercise disciplinary measures? How do you find out when those disciplinary measures would be required? My letter did not request the reconsideration of any issue with the case, it suggested disciplinary action for Sara Goren appeared to be appropriate as she was displaying an extreme bias.

Judge Hodson, you were presented with an opportunity to correct an extreme and very serious injustice within your court. Your intentional neglect and failure to take any action resulted in chaos within your court.

Your ‘approach’ allowed that chaos to continue unchecked and undermine the dignity of the judiciary, and affect additional judges on the Court.

Your ‘approach’ shows a careless and intentional disregard and neglect for ‘the system’ for which you have custody.

2010
08.23

On Friday, I dropped off the document pointing out the Ex Parte Orders from 2007 and filed it at the prothonotary.

When I read the docket this morning the docket entry reads:

OF DISCOVERY OF EX PARRE ORDERS DATED8/20/2010 BY DEFT

It should be…

OF DISCOVERY OF EX PARTE ORDERS DATED 8/20/2007 BY DEFT

At 10:45 AM, I contacted Bonnie O’Kane at the Prothonotary to request it be corrected. I met with Bonnie on August 13, 2010. In that conversation, Bonnie confirmed the information regarding the Prothonotary procedural issues.

At 11:30 AM, The document title is still not correct.

At 2:30 PM, The document title has still not been corrected.
(Perhaps there is a reporting delay and the system has yet to update the data available through the web. ???)

UPDATE: WEDNESDAY AUGUST 25 @ 9:30 AM.
I again spoke with Bonnie O’Kane at the Prothonotary and she confirmed the correction has not yet been made. She adamantly offered no excuse, explanation or expectation of when the docket will list the item correctly and then hung up on me. This seems to indicate the involvement of the Prothonotary in the conspiracy. I wonder if they fired the clerk who accidentally provided the file to me? I have not seen him at the Prothonotary since that date.

[ I have read other cases where the Judge’s excuse for not reading documents was that they were not docketed correctly. They used this in the Appeal process as an excuse… while they proceeded to destroy and discredit the appeal based on the improper filing. THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE. ]

%d bloggers like this: