2014
08.22

A law enacted by the state supreme court in every state without proper construction, without constitutional review, without involvement of any state legislature and without the signature of any governor designed to ignore judicial corruption and injustice which includes an aggressively enforced MANDATE of silence for all lawyers while ignoring, denying and preventing the constitutional rights of litigants.

The Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6

Rule 1.6 affects civil, criminal, family, federal district and federal appeals courts making it impossible to address the loss of constitutional rights when committed by a judge.

The Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 1.6
CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION mandates confidentiality of client information where the information
- would affect the integrity of the judiciary,
- would reveal the misconduct of their own office,
- would expose individual liability,
- would adversely affect their client.

The Attorney General of Pennsylvania represents the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Governor, the Attorney General’s office, various branches of the government, their agencies and their officers and the public. Clients.

This is why Kids for Cash was ignored by the Attorney General.

This is why Sandusky was ignored by the Attorney General.

This is why millions of foreclosures were ignored by the Attorney General.

Rule 1.6 has undermined law enforcement and the judicial branch in the states and federally.

Rule 1.6 is a core part of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct. All rules point back to Rule 1.6 by cross reference.

The ABA presented the Rules to each state supreme court for promulgation into law. The American Bar Association took their trade laws which were discretionary and the supreme courts turned them into lawful mandates. Aggressively enforced mandates which denied people’s constitutional rights. BUT, the silence prevented anyone in law from acting on behalf of the victim of the loss of their constitutional rights.

An inescapable loss of constitutional rights.

image_pdfimage_print
2014
08.22

Response to US Attorney

August 22, 2104

U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorneys

RE: Your letter dated August 19, 2014 (Attached)

A package was hand delivered to the Philadelphia US Attorney’s office and we asked for a meeting. The attached response is inappropriate, unsigned, on questionable letterhead and completely neglects the issue to be discussed.

The game of making certain there is no way to know to whom we should follow up is tiresome. Why is the United States Attorney playing with people asking for help? And why is the issue no longer the relevant one, but the impossibility of meeting to discuss a federal crime?

Your reply indicates that that the US Attorney “is responsible for the prosecution of persons accused of violating federal laws”. The Constitution of the United States is a federal law. Rights secured by the constitution have been violated, personally and to millions across the nation.

The Pennsylvania Judiciary has violated the Constitution of the United States leaving the courts undermined by a rule enacted by the state supreme court which additionally violates the Pennsylvania Constitution. The same rule undermines the federal courts. The package of letters provided exposed this issue with clear examples.

If your office is also following the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and as lawyers you are obligated to conceal the crime because it adversely affects the integrity of the judiciary, then indicate that truth and recognize it as the problem to be addressed.

Acknowledge the mandate requiring all lawyers to ignore judicial corruption and injustice, and acknowledge that the judicial branch of state and federal government has been undermined by one rule put forth by the American Bar Association which has undermined the United States Constitution in every court in the country.

The Department of Justice indicates the US Attorney is the appropriate contact.

A meeting is requested to discuss the issue and the criminal actions which have occurred to prevent exposure and resolution of this national issue.

Respectfully,

Terance Healy
Todd Krautheim

( PDF version )

image_pdfimage_print
2014
08.20

Your lawyer is bragging about the injustice of the Weilheimer decision. Seriously?

How laughable that a lawyer in a large Philadelphia law firm records his 2014 successes – TWO – and the one entry is based on corruption and fraud with no support in law and an appeal is pending.

Your lawyer wasn’t representing the Millers.* The Millers didn’t even bother to show up. If the Millers had shown up maybe they could explain that “Weilheimer for Judge” sign on the lawn? Judge Weilheimer couldn’t explain it.* Are we supposed to believe that in a local election, people believe so much in a candidate that they do not know and have never met that they seek out and obtain a sign supporting their election?

The lawyer failed to address the essential issue.** The lack of jurisdiction of the order they were seeking to enforce.** No mention of anything which supported jurisdiction in the entire transcript.** Yet the lack of jurisdiction was proven beyond any doubt on the court record… AND COMPLETELY IGNORED BY JUDGE WEILHEIMER.***

In the Appeal, Judge Weilheimer delayed 5 months in issuing her opinion. Justice delayed is justice denied. In her opinion she neglects to offer any support for the jurisdiction of the defective and void order.***

YET, THE LAWYER IS BRAGGING ABOUT THIS ‘WIN’ ON THE COMPANY WEB SITE. The lawyer who neglected to reveal that his client was Genuine Title Company.**** He never met the Defendants.

Bragging about the deliberate infliction of injustice. A big win – still pending appeal. A pathetic display of arrogance in the face of judicial corruption and injustice. Keeping a man homeless and destitute for a prolonged period while trying to regain his rightful property after enduring constant litigation since 2007.

* Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of client identity
** Rule 1.6 – Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary
*** Rule 1.6 – Do not self incriminate. Do not adversely affect the integrity of the judiciary.
**** Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of client identity

Ejectment Action Against Homeowners Dismissed – April 9, 2014

zarwin

Is this posted on your mother’s fridge?

image_pdfimage_print
2014
08.20

The illusion of hope I present exists as much for myself as for the others who endure it.

A rare emotional presentation of information.



When the GATEKEEPER who answers the phone and becomes TOTALLY CLUELESS and doesn’t even know his supervisors name – the walls prevent information from getting to those who can make a change.

Spencer. We have tried for over a month to get in touch with people in your office. Computers and phones are hacked here. Internet is blocked and emails prevented. The Pennsylvania Republicans BLOCK this web site – making it impossible to inform them. So we go to their offices with information. We endure the scheduling issues and the insulting innuendo.

I face the impossibility of contacting those who can make a difference on a daily basis. Do you think maybe people are calling about an issue of importance and deserve an answer? Some respect? I have been doing this since 2007, you are not the first GATEKEEPER.



The first GATEKEEPER experience in 2007 had exposed the ridiculous pretend investigation by the DEA while purporting to be the FBI. No one at any FBI office knew Agent “Rose” when I called. After speaking with her for over a month, I left a message on her phone to buy donuts for her office because they did not know who she was. She never called back.



Rep Kathy Watson, YES, it took 10 months to get a meeting with you. After repeated contact and visits to your office because the phones are intercepted. I have no cell phone. Most homeless and destitute folks have no phones. The messages were left at my mother’s house. So Yes, after being ignored in person and on the phone for months, I again walked into your office. When confronted, your staff strongly indicated it was my fault for not repeatedly contacting them – though I had. ONLY THEN DID WE GET THE MEETING.

You finally met with us and understood the issue.

During that meeting, I had to accept criticism for raising my voice at your staff about their neglecting to contact me. I had to accept criticism about how I was dressed. I am homeless. I have no money in my pocket. You are talking about the expense of replacing your desk. My underwear is ripped. My clothes are clean, but there ARE NOT MANY HOMELESS FOLKS IN BUSINESS SUITS. I was not supposed to live through the experience – and I wish I hadn’t. Forgive me for taking things personally but I am experiencing it personally. The interference is personal. The ability to not fall apart completely fails on occasion. Because I am human like that.

There is never enough time to meet to discuss the issues. There is always time to make excuses and criticize the victim who is begging for help. I realize the perception that because I write about what happened, I’m the ungrateful one. EVEN THOUGH, I noticed and appreciated your preparedness and knowledge of the issue.

I receive the disrespect and rudeness from strangers on a daily basis. You cannot imagine what it is like to spend an hour in my existence. I wouldn’t wish it on you or anyone.



Rep Marguerite Quinn. I am not the enemy. You could have been prepared for the meeting.

You accused me of bashing lawyers. Though I present WHY lawyers are perceived to be corrupt and the law which mandates that participation in corruption.

You suggested I was about to insult your uncle when I began to speak about the Federal case. When I am presenting how this issue affects the integrity of the judiciary by mandating judges to conceal the injustice and corruption of prior judges in the matter. IT IS PROBABLE THAT “UNCLE JUDGE” NEVER EVEN SAW THE MATTER BECAUSE IT WAS INTERFERED WITH BY THE COURT CLERKS – LAWYERS MANDATED TO CONCEAL INJUSTICE.

Your preconceived notions of me were dead wrong. I demonstrated that and didn’t shy away from anything you raised about ME. You realized that whatever information you thought you knew was incorrect. POINTS to Archbishop Wood Class of 81. Me too.

Then the game of send information by email begins – when the information is in your hands. Our Computers and phones are hacked. We cannot trust the technology. ( Think about what Snowden reported and put it in the hands of the local bar association and the private investigators who are outside the law. )

Why are the Pennsylvania Republicans blocking the Work2BDone web site? That same information blocking program prevents email from getting through also.

BIG SURPRISE WHEN THE VICTIM IS NOT LASHING BACK POINTLESSLY AND CAN EXPLAIN THE MISTREATMENT EXPERIENCED BY EVERYONE IS CAUSED BY THE VERY ISSUE BEING PRESENTED.



Rep Todd Stephens. Clueless and trained stupid. In practice, the judges can destroy people by ignoring the law and the constitution. In law, they cannot. The law we are talking to the lawyer about causes this injustice to be ignored BY MANDATE. AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE which requires lawyers to ignore the rights of the litigants.



Senator Stewart Greenleaf. You prevent resolution while sitting on the judiciary committee. You are a coward who cannot even face the victim of the injustice you proliferate, endorse and maintain. Your staff are well informed about the experience. They watched as I begged for help. They watched as I found the problem. They watched as I presented numerous examples of the injustice WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. YOU ARE MORE THAN PART OF THE PROBLEM. YOU ARE THE PROBLEM PERSONIFIED.



Senator Chuck McIlhinney. What gives? We ask you to bring the issue to the PA legislature in December 2013. We meet. We keep you informed. You stall. You delay. You stop responding. We hand deliver letters. You tried to pawn it off onto Senator Greenleaf instead of working together. He’s a lawyer. You are not. He is prevented by law. You are not. You both know the seriousness of the issue. Could the ‘Bucks County Machine’ really tell you to SHUT UP and stop meeting with those guys. And is that what you’ve done?



Attorney General Kathleen Kane. You’ve seen first hand in this issue how the staff of the Attorney general’s office can undermine justice, the law and a persons constitutional rights. It was done on a public stage with 55 other attorneys general. And still you hide behind a law which has been demonstrated to be unconstitutional and corrupt and affecting millions. You cannot be disciplined for addressing what will be deemed a nullity. It’s not a law, it’s a nullity.



We have provided documentation about the issue to:
every Governor,
every US Senator,
every US Representative,
every Pennsylvania legislator,
every Pennsylvania Sheriff,
every US Attorney,
every judge in Bucks County Pennsylvania,
every judge in Montgomery County Pennsylvania
SILENCE IS CONSENT.

The homeless and destitute victim was able to communicate the issue, file in federal court, repeatedly refile motions in Superior court to address ‘pretend’ per curiam orders, the paper, postage, copying, the expense of enduring the lawlessness, and of courser they don’t have to provide the court records so prepare your appeal without the documents necessary for the appeal.

You are fighting for your rights.

The courts think you are trying to expose their corruption when THEY are providing the evidence of their own corruption. You are just trying to survive it.



The lies of the American government agencies are tremendous. DOJ tells us to write to the US Attorney. The US Attorney indicates that they only have jurisdiction where a federal law has been broken. The US Constitution is a federal law – the supreme law of the land.

Doesn’t the US Attorney know that? Once you lose your constitutional rights, the refusal to commit suicide is considered spite. The disappointment at your not going ‘mad’ so they can arrest you is clear. They will make you homeless, destitute and alone… writing stupid letters if you still have an address. You were not supposed to survive and expose the problem. And ONLY a victim would have standing to present it in court – without any lawyer involved. You are not supposed to have survived this long.

No one helps. I AM SO SICK OF SURVIVING.




The walls and blockades erected by the lawyers to whom everyone turns for advice. THEY ARE MANDATED TO CONCEAL THE PROBLEM. And I know this. I have experienced this. I excuse them because their twisted unconstitutional law MANDATES they do this to people and to me.

I excuse the govt officials who are prevented from exposing that the judiciary has failed because they may not expose the collapse of the govt. WHILE ALL AROUND US WE SEE THE FALL.

The inhumanity of their actions and how they turn a society at will.



Lawyers can create a economy. Have a cop shoot an unarmed kid and the lawyers revenue goes through the roof. Riots, media, govt officials, victims, innocent bystanders, all brought together and needing a lawyer.

The only ones who are getting paid are the lawyers…. and by those who have not got the money to afford it.



I persevered thru the nightmare, I found the cause of the issue, not just for me but for millions. I have endured the hatred the misinformation and the redirection. Been denied simple respect from people who were afraid once they heard that the LAWYERS HAVE UNDERMINED THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT. I exposed HOW they did it. I backed up every statement with well-known examples and evidence.

And still… The injustice continues. I was not supposed to survive. Family friends and everyone are gone. They were exhausted and frightened by the experience.

I sit alone most days. Trying to live. Explaining the corruption of an entire society and a country. A deliberate crime committed by the lawyers, the American Bar Association. They have the ability to block every resolution and prevent exposure by the media.

The reasons to ignore the issue are overwhelming. The ability to present it are quickly undermined by misconceptions, misinformation, or a simple expression. I am accused of everything that THEY are doing to me. I walk in the front doors. I ask for help. I try to summarize the issue. They ask for more information and when they hear it they become more and more frightened by what they are hearing.

No one has ever said I was wrong. Yes, I have thought about most every angle. I have explanations for every scenario. Not because I am a know-it-all… but because I have lived this nightmare.

Accuse me of anger. You’re wrong but the reality is that I am supposed to be angry – who wouldn’t be angry after going through this experience. That’s how they usually have the victim thrown in jail.

There is no happiness in the isolation of the prison of information to which I am confined. And no one gives a damn until they are in the ‘next cell’ and no one is listening to them either. I understand the suicides.

There’s no joy. The illusion of hope I present exists as much for myself as for the others who endure it.

I persevere. JUSTICE IS COMING.


This document has been sent to every Pennsylvania Senator via their web based form. This web site is blocked by the Republicans in the legislature. Though, Democrats can see it. Email to the legislature is blocked and prevented by a similar program. I receive over 11,000 emails per day which prevent me from receiving email – the mailbox is always full. The reason this issue has not seen the light of day is because they have made it impossible to maintain effective communications with anyone. Phones and computers are hacked. You cannot trust the technology.
The Pennsylvania Senate.

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, obey and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this Commonwealth and that I will discharge the duties of my office with fidelity.”

Alloway, Richard L. (R)
Argall, David G. (R)
Baker, Lisa (R)
Blake, John P. (D)
Boscola, Lisa M. (D)
Brewster, James R. (D)
Browne, Patrick M. (R)
Brubaker, Mike (R)
Corman, Jake (R)
Costa, Jay (D)
Dinniman, Andrew E. (D)
Eichelberger, John H. (R)
Erickson, Edwin B. (R)
Farnese, Lawrence M. (D)
Ferlo, Jim (D)
Folmer, Mike (R)
Fontana, Wayne D. (D)
Gordner, John R. (R)
Greenleaf, Stewart J. (R)
Hughes, Vincent J. (D)
Hutchinson, Scott E. (R)
Kasunic, Richard A (D)
Kitchen, Shirley M. (D)
Leach, Daylin (D)
McIlhinney, Charles T. (R)
Mensch, Bob (R)
Pileggi, Dominic (R)
Rafferty, John C. (R)
Robbins, Robert D. (R)
Scarnati, Joseph B. (R)
Schwank, Judith L. (D)
Smith, Matt (D)
Smucker, Lloyd K. (R)
Solobay, Timothy J. (D)
Stack, Michael J. (D)
Tartaglione, Christine M. (D)
Teplitz, Rob (D)
Tomlinson, Robert M. (R)
Vance, Patricia H. (R)
Vogel, Elder A. (R)
Vulakovich, Randy (R)
Wagner, Scott (R)
Ward, Kim L. (R)
Washington, LeAnna M. (D)
White, Donald C. (R)
Wiley, Sean (D)
Williams, Anthony H. (D)
Wozniak, John N. (D)
Yaw, Gene (R)
Yudichak, John T. (D)

image_pdfimage_print
2014
08.18

Remedy of the people when rights are violated

THIS CONSTITUTION, and the LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES which SHALL BE made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND; and the JUDGES IN EVERY STATE SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

MISPRISION OF TREASON—USC 18 §2382
Whoever having knowledge of treason, conceals and does not make known the same to some judge, is guilty of treason for contempt against the sovereign, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

BRIBERY—USC 18 §201
Bribery of any public official directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person to influence any official act.

CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS—USC 18 §241
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS—USC 18 §242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State the deprivation of any rights, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

CONCEALMENT—USC 18 §2071
Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, documents filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court, shall be fined or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

CLERK IS TO FILE—USC 18 §2076
Whoever, being a clerk, willfully refuses or neglects to make or forward any report, certificate, statement, or document as required by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS—USC 42 §1983
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State subjects, or causes to be subjected, any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall 8be liable to the party injured in an action at law.

CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE—USC 42 §1985
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly any persons rights the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages against any one or more of the conspirators.

NEGLECT TO PREVENT—USC 42 §1986
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done or are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured.

Exerpt from the Grand Jury Hand Book.

image_pdfimage_print
2014
08.16

This week we traveled around Bucks County stopping to deliver packages of the letters and the newspaper from Scranton/Wilkes-Barre and requesting meetings with Congressmen, State Senators and Representatives regarding the unconstitutionality and the injustice of Rule 1.6.

We appreciate the interest and the support we are receiving from those who have been informed and anticipate further cooperation and effort from those who are only now learning about this national constitutional issue.

US Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick received a copy of the documents and newspaper in his office near Newtown. Then, as luck would have it, we ran into him at the Courthouse in Doylestown to hand deliver a set and quickly discuss the urgency of meeting on the issue. A meeting with the congressmen has not yet been scheduled by his office.

Representative Scott Petri’s people had some time to sit with us for a discussion of the issue. A meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Marguerite Quinn has scheduled a meeting.

Representative John T. Galloway’s assistant Brenda sat with us and reviewed the documents left for the representative. A meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Tina Davis’s Chief of Staff met with us and heard an overview of the issue. The package was left with him to review with the representative. A meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Steven J. Santarsiero’s people had some time to review the issue. Chief of Staff Rosemary Wuenschel accepted the paperwork to review with the representative and schedule a meeting to discuss the topic.

Our neighbor in Doylestown, Senator Chuck McIlhinney, was not available to meet. We left updates and documents with his staff and AGAIN requested an opportunity to discuss the silence from the Pennsylvania Senate since December 2013 regarding the issue.

Senator Robert Tomlinson’s assistant accepted the paperwork and the request for a meeting on the topic.

Representative Frank Farry’s office manager sat down for a very good meeting and discussion of the topic. After reviewing the documents and newspaper articles, a meeting with the representative was requested.

Representative Kathy Watson had obviously reviewed the documentation delivered prior to our meeting. A very productive discussion and explanation and review of the issue ended with a request for the PA Legislature to be formally informed of the issue. Representative Watson understood and recognized the problem we were reporting and attempting to address. We anticipate her involvement in the resolution of the matter for the sake of the Commonwealth and the country.

Representative Clymer’s office was not open when we visited.

Senator Bob Mensch’s office is on our list for Montgomery County visits.

Senator Stewart Greenleaf’s office refuses to schedule a meeting on the issue. As head of the Judiciary Committee this is NOT ACCEPTABLE. We will continue to pursue the involvement of Senator Greenleaf while questioning his deliberate, intentional and well informed avoidance of the issue. His silence demonstrates complicity.

Representative Todd Stephens was caught in his office and denied meeting with Healy before in 2011 about the corruption in Montgomery County. That was when Healy v Healy had only involved 16 judges. Now it’s at 20 with two appeals in Superior Court pending. Rep. Stephens has been trained to believe that judges may deny people’s rights which are protected by the US Constitution. TODD STEPHENS IS WRONG. After that foolishness was addressed, the impromptu meeting ended abruptly. A meeting with the representative was requested to further discuss the issue.

While we were out enjoying the back roads of beautiful Bucks County, the fax was sending copies to EVERY Pennsylvania State Representative. Confirmations received.

The government of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has been notified of the issue.

image_pdfimage_print
2014
08.14

We are meeting with local politicians and presenting the issue of Rule 1.6 undermining the American Judicial system. To accomplish this requires the repetition of the experience, the facts, the results – homelessness, incarceration and suicides.

It requires me to do something I have tried avoiding. The retelling of my experience causes me to relive the stress and emotion. The purpose of the web site was so that i did not have to explain the details to people who wanted to know more – or who couldn’t imagine surviving the truth of the story.

A person who has lost their rights can best be identified by the following statement:


I am a sane man dealing with an absolutely insane situation. Every person in a position to help has acted improperly in direct violation of procedures and the law preventing the resolution of any matter… they each make the situation worse… NO ONE HELPED…
NO ONE COULD HELP… until the Constitutional Challenge of Rule 1.6


The message is getting out… Those we have spoken to have been emotionally moved. Those who refuse to meet and discuss the problem can be categorized and described in one word – LAWYERS.

The lawyers know what has happened. The law prevents them from any action to resolve the situation UNTIL THEY RECOGNIZE THAT IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND STAND UP LIKE AN AMERICAN AND FACE THE MESS THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION HAS CREATED.

The non-lawyers need to rescue the US before the divisive tactics of those who seek the country’s destruction succeed.

We are Americans. We don’t allow injustice to persist. We can fix the mess created and resolve the damage done to millions of Americans stripped of their Constitutional Rights.

Through countless retellings, I persevere. JUSTICE IS COMING.

image_pdfimage_print
2014
08.13

The following media outlets have received all of the letters to state and federal law enforcement and government.

boston globe logo New-York-Times-Logo nbc-logo Cbs-logo news-los-angeles-times-logo AP cspan download (1)

image_pdfimage_print
2014
08.11

RobinWilliamsMagnum

Will the Family Courts ever stop their destruction of lives and families?

Robin Williams, post-divorce, back in rehab in Minnesota
- posted in High Asset Divorce on Friday, July 11, 2014.

Robin Williams was divorced in 2009, after he and his wife filed for divorce the year before, and he has said that he believes it was because of his drinking problems. He did note that he could tell his wife that he was sorry, but he said that that just was not always enough to get rid of the issues. The official reason for the divorce has been listed as irreconcilable differences.

The actor did give up both drugs and alcohol at some point in the 1980s. However, he has not been been completely off them since then. Most notably, he began to drink again back in 2003. He was in Alaska, doing a movie, and he started drinking because he felt lonely. He then went to a rehab center in Oregon in 2006.

The actor’s long battle appears to be continuing, as recent reports indicate that he is at the Hazeldon Addiction Treatment Center, which is close to Lindstrom, Minnesota. However, the program that he is doing seems to be one that is aimed at helping people refocus before they relapse, so he may not have started using alcohol again.

A photo recently surfaced of the actor at a Dairy Queen near the treatment center, which was taken with a female employee of the shop.


Statement by President Obama on the Passing of Robin Williams

Robin Williams was an airman, a doctor, a genie, a nanny, a president, a professor, a bangarang Peter Pan, and everything in between. But he was one of a kind. He arrived in our lives as an alien – but he ended up touching every element of the human spirit. He made us laugh. He made us cry. He gave his immeasurable talent freely and generously to those who needed it most – from our troops stationed abroad to the marginalized on our own streets. The Obama family offers our condolences to Robin’s family, his friends, and everyone who found their voice and their verse thanks to Robin Williams.

image_pdfimage_print
2014
08.11

downloadA chance encounter with Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick outside the Courthouse in Doylestown today gave Todd an opportunity to explain the Rule 1.6 issue and pass along the letters which have been sent to all levels of state and federal government nationally.

The letters had been hand delivered to his Newtown office last week.

A meeting will be arranged this week to have a full discussion of the topic.

PDF of the Letters delivered to Rep. Fitzpatrick.

image_pdfimage_print