A Terroristic Divorce

I have experienced a targeted intrusion onto my computers for the last 5 years. There has been no effective escape.

This is not a random intrusion. I have been targeted by a private investigator, as that private investigator works with local law enforcement, there has been no assistance, investigation or prosecution for the intrusion/remotes control/surveillance/redirection.

Initially it started as WebWatcher by Awareness Technologies. I still have the appcompat file which they installed through windows mail in an email which did NOT need to be opened. The software deployed as soon as the email was delivered to the machine.

Since that time I have watched them update their program as they watched me expose it. There is no way to prevent a targeted installation such as this. They have the power to filter the web, and to disable avas programs. I have watched them disable all of the major programs. It seems the simplest method has been to install a junction or symbolic link which prevents a scan from ever completing.

The programs have been exposed on Linux, and Windows installations. Again, I have watched the installation programs download with me powerless to prevent it. I have attempted to work with it however the ability to control email and web access has made it necessary to confirm any information I receive. They are using me as their R&D department and updating their programs to circumvent/prevent my actions from being successful.

The current version runs from a BIOS initiation, creating a virtual disk from whioh to load the program. As it them runs from virtual memory it has been difficult to nail down. But the clues are there that i am running a version of windows inside their window. Basically there are hardware issues which cannot be addressed while stuck in their window.

Numerous programs have indicated the presence of the surveillance/remote control/filtering program, but none can remove it. At best, I have watched protection work for a few hours, maybe a few days, and then become useless.

I have been lucky only because when I detected the initial intrusion in 2007, I pulled all hard disks from all computers. This has prevented them from placing incriminating files on my computer and then accusing me of responsibility for them. I immediately recognized the possibility/probability of this type of action.

You may be asking WHY? The initial install was by my wife, on my business computers as she planned a divorce. Once detected she and her lawyer hired the private investigator to cover the federal crime. The private investigator is former FBI and works directly with the county managing their informant program and also surveillance (without search warrants). This involvement with law enforcement has prevented law enforcement from taking any action, as they risk exposing their own methods.

I have tried everything I can think of. 20+ years in IT and I have used everything I ever learned about computers and Internet and IP tracking.

Do you have any advice? I am under constant assault by the attorneys who have manipulated law enforcement into inaction. The lawyers have done the same with the courts. Once one judge was manipulated, 8 subsequent judges in the divorce have been forced to further the injustice in violation of laws and procedures. Most of the legal battle is documented on www.work2bdone.com/live It’s not a whining divorce site. It documents a terroristic high tech divorce which has destroyed a family for going on 6 years.

Whenever I am attempting to assemble a petition for the court which will expose the actions/injustice/corruption, I am served with more ridiculous and frivolous actions from my wife’s attorney designed to just create chaos. This has been the case since the initial intrusion was proven in July 2007. They have also used their surveillance information to have judges recuse without the petition requesting it even being filed. When anything else fails, the lawyers expose the judges unethical conversations with them and gain more impunity for themselves and further injustice for me.

Any Help or advice would b greatly appreciated. If you do contact me, i assure you I will respond. Remember, they control the computers. They also control the cell phone. Effective communication has not been easy. But here are work arounds, and once initial contact is made, they do not interfere as much.

Please help. Your comments on this post are reviewed and never posted to the web site.

Taken from THE MORNING CALL April 18, 2012

It also was reported Saturday that the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association wants to expand unwarranted blanket searches in the form of electronic eavesdropping. “To do nothing is not an option,” said Montgomery County DA Risa Ferman.

Yes, that’s exactly how George III felt; authorities must be allowed ever-increasing power to intrude and to dominate our lives.

Note to Risa Ferman: If you are looking to expand your unwarranted surveillance program begin by investigating the failures of your organization to behavior lawfully in their current practices.

1) The technology intrusions which have harassed and destroyed my professional and personal life have been ignored by your organization. WHY?

2) The information stolen from my computer has been delivered to judges who were able to recuse before being asked to recuse?

3) It is astounding to recognize that your organization has at no time decided to act responsibly? Do you intend to terrorize and harass until someone is dead?

To do nothing is not an option, BUT IT HAS BEEN THE CHOICE YOU HAVE MADE IN IGNORING THE MANIPULATION AND CORRUPTION OCCURRING IN THE BUILDING YOU WORK IN SINCE YOU TOOK OFFICE.

Your illegal and unethical surveillance program has demonstrated it’s power…. the power to destroy… the power to hide… the power to attack… the power to avoid prosecution… the power to protect itself at all costs.

What crime is it that I am supposed to have committed that has warranted the intrusion? Or am I supposed to ignore the private investigator that your organization refuses to prosecute? How can I ignore the fact that I am being harassed and terrorized when they won’t stop? If they stop, they won’t be able to control my information and communications. They risk being exposed, SO THEY WON’T STOP. And I have no other alternative but to persevere and await the day their actions are exposed.

There is no way to stop a targeted intrusion. When law enforcement is ignoring the crimes because they are partially liable for creating the situation it is irresponsible and corrupt. IT IS EVIL. TO DO NOTHING IS NOT AN OPTION… I have no choice… Risa Ferman has a choice. She chose to do nothing. And has allowed this to envelope more and more county personnel and resources.

The investigator who stopped advertising his internet business? the one who advertised that lawyers need his services to spy on other lawyers? the one who advertised his ethical hacking? Ethical hacking for illegal purposes?

The Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas has demonstrated their abuse of power since 2007. When might the law apply?

I am anticipating that the law may apply once the case is moved to another court.

The surprising thing is that ANY COURT in the land is empowered to void the orders of the Montgomery County Court. There is also no deadline for designating an order is void…. because the order is ALREADY void because of the corrupt actions of the court.

In my case, the fact that I had notified the court of the defect in the order and requested a hearing within the 30 day period removes the question of whether the document was submitted timely. The fact that the Court further ignored the petition before the court and held no hearing on the matter before dismissing the petition reaffirms that I was trying to accomplish raising the matters on a timely basis, BUT THE COURT WAS REFUSING TO COOPERATE.

The law doesn’t say that the Court has to cooperate within the 30 Days. It simply states that the petition must be filed with the court and served on the parties.

BTW, Whoever is running the Prothonotary might want to look into the missing documents, and the ones which are improperly titled to mislead that the Appeal was denied by the Superior Court. THAT did not happen. The order from the Superior Court indicated that they could not force the lower court to hold a hearing. The court woul dhave to hold the hearing on the Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, OR I could petition the Supreme COurt of Pennsylvania for a Writ Of Mandamus to compel the Court to hold the appropriate hearing. (And if we are going to go all Mandamus, I can assure you that the request will be made to recuse the entire Montgomery County Bench from this matter.)

---

The law is very consistent accurate on this topic. When a judge fails to follow due process and procedure, the judge does not have jurisdiction to issue an order on the matter.

In my case, when advised of the defect in her Order which would void the order, Judge Carolyn Carluccio proceeded to indicate that she did not have jurisdiction – REPEATEDLY, INCORRECTLY AND ON THE RECORD. Repeating that she did not have jurisdiction to void her own defective and void order. She would further issue orders and sanctions against me based on the void order – that she knows is void. She also knows she is committing EXTRINSIC FRAUD – repeatedly and on the record, in attempting to deny my rights and convince me that it it proper. Judge Carolyn Carluccio would also prevent the matter from proceeding to the Superior Court so that an Appeal could be heard. Judge Carolyn Carluccio was determined to commit as much fraud, ethical violations and crimes in the attempt to destroy my life, leaving me homeless and destitute after surviving 6 years of injustice and corruption. She did so knowing she would have judicial immunity and not face civil liability. While judicial immunity does permit her to terrorize any litigant in her court and escape civil damages… JUDICIAL IMMUNITY DOES NOT EXTEND TO THE COUNTY… nor to the minions who have worked to conceal the judge’s crimes. The same judicial immunity extends to Judge DelRicci, Judge Bertin, Judge Coonahan, Judge Barrett, Judge Daniele, Judge Tilson. BUT THEIR JUDICIAL IMMUNITY DOES NOT EXTEND TO THE COUNTY… … nor to the minions who have worked to conceal the judges’ crimes. AND of course, the judges violated the constitution, and the laws and procedures of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for which they should face criminal prosecution. When a judge commits a crime, it is still a crime. They may not be liable for civil damages, but they are NOT excused from criminal prosecution. And what litigant is going to place their trust in a judiciary which is more criminal than the cases they hear.

Void judgment. One which has has no legal force or effect, invalidity of which may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place directly or collaterally. Reynolds v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1087, 1092. One which from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. Judgment is a “void judgment” if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process. Klugh v. U.S., D.C.S.C., 610 F.Supp. 892, 901. See also Voidable judgment.

Void judgment. One which has has no legal force or effect, invalidity of which may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place directly or collaterally. Reynolds v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1087, 1092. One which from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. Judgment is a “void judgment” if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process. Klugh v. U.S., D.C.S.C., 610 F.Supp. 892, 901. See also Voidable judgment.

Other Authorities on Void Judgments:

Void judgments are those rendered by a court which lacked jurisdiction, either of the subject matter or the parties. See:

Wahl v. Round Valley Bank, 38 Ariz. 411, 300 P.955 (1931) Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. Otterson, 16 Ariz. 305, 146 P. 203 (1914) Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 2d 278 (1940)

A void judgment which includes judgment entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, or an order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that the party is properly before the court. See Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182 F.3d 548 (C.A. 7 Ill. 1999)

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect. See Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 27, 453 F.2d 645, 14 A.L.R. Fed. 298 (C.A. 1 Mass. 1972)

A void judgment is one which from the beginning was complete nullity and without any legal effect. See Hobbs v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 485 F.Supp. 456 (M.D. Fla. 1980).

Void judgment is one that, from its inception, is complete nullity and without legal effect. Holstein v. City of Chicago, 803 F.Supp. 205, reconsideration denied 149 F.R.D. 147, affirmed 29 F.3d 1145 (N.D. Ill. 1992).

Void judgment is one where court lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or entry of order violated due process, U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5-Triad Energy Corp. v. McNell, 110 F.R.D. 382 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).

Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, Fed Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28 U.S.C.A.; U.S.C.A. Const Amend. 5. Klugh v. U.S., 620 F.Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect, Rubin v. Johns, 109 F.R.D. 174 (D. Virgin Islands 1985).

A void judgment is one which, from its inception, is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind the parties or to support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of enforcement in any manner or to any degree. Loyd v. Director, Dept. of Public Safety, 480 So.2d 577 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985). A judgment shown by evidence to be invalid for want of jurisdiction is a void judgment or at all events has all attributes of a void judgment, City of Los Angeles v. Morgan, 234 P.2d 319 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 1951).

Void judgment which is subject to collateral attack, is simulated judgment devoid of any potency because of jurisdictional defects, Ward. v. Terriere, 386 P.2d 352 (Colo. 1963). A void judgment is a simulated judgment devoid of any potency because of jurisdictional defects only, in the court rendering it and defect of jurisdiction may relate to a party or parties, the subject matter, the cause of action, the question to be determined, or relief to be granted, Davidson Chevrolet, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 330 P.2d 1116, certiorari denied 79 S.Ct. 609, 359 U.S. 926, 3 L.Ed. 2d 629 (Colo. 1958).

Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdiction of parties or subject matter or that lacks inherent power to make or enter particular order involved and such a judgment may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally, People v. Wade, 506 N.W.2d 954 (Ill. 1987).

Void judgment may be defined as one in which rendering court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, lacked personal jurisdiction, or acted in manner inconsistent with due process of law Eckel v. MacNeal, 628 N.E.2d 741 (Ill. App.Dist. 1993).

Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdiction of parties or subject matter or that lacks inherent power to make or enter particular order involved; such judgment may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally People v. Sales, 551 N.E.2d 1359 (Ill.App. 2 Dist. 1990).

Res judicata consequences will not be applied to a void judgment which is one which, from its inception, is a complete nullity and without legal effect, Allcock v. Allcock, 437 N.E.2d 392 (Ill.App.3 Dist. 1982).

Void judgment is one which, from its inception is complete nullity and without legal effect In re Marriage of Parks, 630 N.E.2d 509 (Ill.App. 5 Dist. 1994).

Void judgment is one entered by court that lacks the inherent power to make or enter the particular order involved, and it may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally; such a judgment would be a nullity. People v. Rolland, 581 N.E.2d 907 (Ill.APp. 4 Dist. 1991).

Void judgment under federal law is one in which rendering court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over dispute or jurisdiction over parties or acted in manner inconsistent with due process of law or otherwise acted unconstitutionally in entering judgment, U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5, Hays v. Louisiana Dock Co., 452 N.E.2d 1383 (Ill App. 5 Dist. 1983).

A void judgment has no effect whatsoever and is incapable of confirmation or ratification, Lucas v. Estate of Stavos, 609 N.E.2d 1114, rehearing denied, and transfer denied (Ind. App. 1 Dist. 1993).

Void judgment is one that from its inception is a complete nullity and without legal effect Stidham v. Whelchel, 698 N.E.2d 1152 (Ind. 1998).

Relief from void judgment is available when trial court lacked either personal or subject matter jurisdiction, Dusenberry v. Dusenberry, 625 N.E.2d 458 (Ind.App. 1 Dist. 1993).

Void judgment is one rendered by court which lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or acted in manner inconsistent with due process, U.S.C.A. Const. Amends. 5, 14, Matter of Marriage of Hampshire, 896 P.2d 58 (Kan.1997)

Judgment is void if court that rendered it lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction; void judgment is nullity and may be vacated at any time, Matter of Marriage of Welliver, 869 P.2d 653 (Kan. 1994).

A void judgment is one rendered by a a court which lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, In re. Estate of Wells, 983 P.2d 279, (Kan.App. 1999).

Void judgment is one rendered in absence of jurisdiction over subject matter or parties, 310 N.W.2d 502, (Minn. 1981).

A void judgment is one rendered in absence of jurisdiction over subject matter or parties, Lange v. Johnson, 204 N.W.2d 205 (Minn. 1973).

A void judgment is one which has merely semblance, without some essential element, as when court purporting to render it has no jurisdiction, Mills v. Richardson, 81S.E.2d 409 (N.C. 1954).

A void judgment is one which has a mere semblance, but is lacking in some of the essential elements which would authorize the court to proceed to judgment, Henderson v. Henderson, 59 S.E.2d 227, (N.C. 1950).

Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdiction to enter such judgment, State v. Blankenship, 675 N.E.2d 1303, (Ohio App. 9 Dist. 1996).

Void judgment, such as may be vacated at any time is one whose invalidity appears on face of judgment roll, Graff v. Kelly, 814 P.2d 489 (Okl. 1991).

A void judgment is one that is void on face of judgment roll, Capital Federal Savings Bank v. Bewley, 795 P.2d 1051 (Okl. 1990).

Where condition of bail bond was that defendant would appear at present term of court, judgment forfeiting bond for defendant’s bail to appear at subsequent term was a void judgment within rule that laches does not run against a void judgment, Com. V. Miller, 150 A.2d 585 (Pa.Super. 1959).

A void judgment is one in which the judgment is facially invalid because the court lacked jurisdiction or authority to render the judgment, State v. Richie, 20 S.W.3d 624 (Tenn. 2000).

Void judgment is one which shows upon face of record want of jurisdiction in court assuming to render judgment, and want of jurisdiction may be either of persons, subject matter generally, particular question to be decided or relief assumed to be given, State ex re. Dawson v. Bomar, 354 S.W.2d 763, certiorari denied, (Tenn. 1962).

A void judgment is one which shows upon face of record a want of jurisdiction in court assuming to render judgment, Underwood v. Brown, 244 S.W.2d 168 (Tenn. 1951).

Void judgment is one which has no legal force or effect whatever, it is an absolute nullity, its invalidity may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place and it need not be attacked directly but may be attacked collaterally whenever and wherever it is interposed, City of Lufkin v. McVicker, 510 S.X.2d 141 (Twx.Civ.App.-Beaumone 1973).

A void judgment, insofar as it purports to be pronouncement of court, is an absolute nullity, Thompson v. Thompson, 238 S.W.2d 218 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1951).

A void judgment is one that has bee procured by extrinsic or collateral fraud, or entered by court that did not have jurisdiction over subject matter or the parties, Rook v. Rook, 353 S.E. 2d 756 (Va. 1987).

A void judgment is a judgment, decree, or order entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction of the parties or of the subject matter, or which lacks the inherent power to make or enter the particular order involved, State ex re. Turner v. Briggs, 971 P.2d 581 (Wash.App.Div. 1999).

A void judgment or order is one that is entered by a court lacking jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter, or lacking the inherent power to enter the particular order or judgment, or where the order was procured by fraud, In re Adoption of E.L., 733 N.E.2d 846, (Ill. APp. 1 Dist. 2000).

Void judgments are those rendered by court which lacked jurisdiction, either of subject matter or parties, Cockerham. v. Zikratch, 619 P.2d 739 (Ariz. 1980).

Void judgments generally fall into two classifications, that is, judgments where there is want of jurisdiction of person or subject matter, and judgments procured through fraud, and such judgments may be attacked directly or collaterially, Irving v. Rodriquez, 169 N.E.2d 145, (Ill. app. 2 Dis. 1960).

Invalidity needs to appear on face of judgment alone that judgment or order may be said to be intrinsically void or void on its face, if lack of jurisdiction appears from the record, Cockett Oil Co. v. Effie, 374 S.W.2d 154 (Mo.App. 1964).

Decision is void on the face of the judgment roll when form four corners of that roll, it may be determined that at least on of three elements of jurisdiction was absent: (1) jurisdiction over parties, (2) jurisdiction over subject matter, or (3) jurisdictional power to pronounce particular judgment hat was rendered, B & C Investments, INc. v. F & M Nat. Bank & Trust, 903 P.2d 339 (Okla.App.Div 3, 1995).

Void order may be attacked, either directly or collaterally, at any time, In Re Estate of Steinfield, 630 N.E.2d 801, certiorari denied, See also Steinfeld v. Hoddick, 513 U.S. 809 (Ill. 1994).

Void order which is one entered by court which lacks jurisdiction over parties or subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter judgment, or order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally, provided that party is properly before court, People ex. re. Brzica v. Village of Lake Barrington, 644 N.E.2d 66 (Ill.App.2 Dist. 1994).

While voidable orders are readily appealable and must be attacked directly, void order may be circumvented by collateral attack or remedied by mandamus, Sachez v. Hester, 911 S.W.2d 173, (Tex.App. -Corpus Christi 1995).

Arizona courts give great weight to federal courts’ interpretations of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure governing motion for releif from judgment in interpreting identical text of Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure, Estate of Page v. Litzenburg, 852 P.2d 128, review denied (Ariz.App.Div. 1, 1998).

When rule providing for relief from void judgments is applicable, relief is not discretionary matter, but is mandatory, Orner. V. Shalala, 30 F.3d 1307 (Colo. 1994).

Judgments entered where court lacked either subject matter or personal jurisdiction, or that were otherwise entered in violation of due process of law, must be set aside, Jaffe and Asher v. Van Brunt, S.D.N.Y.1994, 158 F.R.D. 278.

A “void” judgment, as we all know, grounds no rights, forms no defense to actions taken thereunder, and is vulnerable to any manner of collateral attack (thus here, by). No statute of limitations or repose runs on its holdings, the matters thought to be settled thereby are not res judicata, and years later, when the memories may have grown dim and rights long been regarded as vested, any disgruntled litigant may reopen old wound and once more probe its depths. And it is then as though trial and adjudication had never been. Fritts v. Krugh, Supreme Court of Michigan, 92 N.W.2d 604, 354 Mich. 97 (10/13/58).

On certiorari this Court may not review questions of fact. Brown v. Blanchard, 39 Mich. 790. It is not at liberty to determine disputed facts (Hyde v. Nelson, 11 Mich 353), nor to review the weight of the evidence. Linn v. Roberts, 5 Mich 443; Lunch v. People, 16 Mich 472. Certiorari is an appropriate remedy to get rid of a void judgment, one which there is no evidence to sustain. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Hunt, 39 Mich 469.

The Fraud and Malice of the Court is clearly documented and demonstrates that THEY WILL NOT ALLOW IT TO EVER END. The documents are docketed. The proof of the terroristic intention of the court is in their own documentation.

There is no getting over it…
There is no moving beyond it…
There is no ending to it…
There is no escaping it… THEY HAVE NEVER INTENDED THAT TO BE AN OPTION. The Court has ordered that there be no end to this matter. Not without further hearings. And the court will not schedule those hearings. And the court will not permit an Appeal to move forward. AND THE COURT WILL CONTINUE TO ABUSE IT’S POWER TO FURTHER INTRUDE VIA TECHNOLOGY AND DENY MY LIFE.

The intention of the court has been to destroy a man to the point of suicide. But, I wouldn’t oblige them.

The inaction of law enforcement is an endorsement of the Court’s fraud and malice. The inaction of the Judicial Conduct Board is an endorsement of the Court’s fraud and malice. The inaction of the County Sheriff is an endorsement of the Court’s fraud and malice. The inaction of the Attorney General is an endorsement of the Court’s fraud and malice. The action of Federal Authorities is indicative of a protracted investigation into the matter. There is no reason to believe that Federal Authorities would ignore, endorse and sanction this level of corruption and abuse of power. Federal Authorities are still in Luzerne County. Every illegal action they discover in Luzerne is also happening in Montgomery… and all of them have happened in this case. The indictments have started in Luzerne County.

The Court issued an order which extends in perpetuity.

That order was issued based on a Petition filed moments before a hearing on another matter.

Carolyn Carluccio repeatedly indicated the purpose of the hearing preventing any testimony by the Defendant which was not directly related to the single issue.

Carolyn Carluccio repeatedly denied any objections for relevance as the Plaintiff proceeded to testify regarding the freshly submitted petition.

Carolyn Carluccio then went on to fraudulently indicate that hearings had been held on all matters.

The New Order was based on the fraudulent and defective Orders which were being prevented from Appeal by Carolyn Carluccio. Preventing any resolution of any matter has been a standard established since the initial deception in August 2007 by Rhonda Daniele.

But this Order goes on in perpetuity… and prevents any recovery without resolution of the matter. It prevents the Defendant from having any life until the matters are resolved.

The fraudulent and malicious order demonstrates the clear intent to terrorize the Defendant who survived 6 years of injustice and corruption.

And to ensure that there would never be another hearing, the Plaintiff withdrew the last minute petition on the next day. Of course, otherwise there might have been a hearing… and Carolyn Carluccio had already issued an order on the matter WITHOUT A HEARING. Any hearing would further expose the direct involvment of Carolyn Carluccio in the fraud and conspiracy.

Carolyn Carluccio is trying to acheive the destruction of a Defendant who has refused to commit suicide after his life has been destroyed without any hope of any future. Any hearings would only provide him the opportunity to present the facts which are all in the courts own documents. Carolyn Carluccio will keep nesting her fraud within the prior frauds where she is preveting any Appeal from moving forward.

If there was no legal basis for the Appeal, they would have allowed the Superior Court the opportunity to deny the Appeal. Carolyn Carluccio knows she is wrong. She lies in her Orders. She lies in her Opinions. She is a disgrace to the judiciary. She is a disgrace to humanity. She hides behind the robes and destroys lives. She won’t permit any escape from her corrupt court.

There is no escaping the terroristic corruption and abuse of power in the Montgomery County Court. And there is no surviving it… and that is exactly what the court intends… to terrorize and attack me for the rest of my life.

There is no future without resolution. There can be no resolution without exposing the injustice and corruption. I am left with no other choice but to persevere until someone finally exposes the crimes of the judges and prosecutes them for the terror they have caused.

Carolyn Carluccio has provided an instrument for destruction which can be used in perpetuity… which if not addressesd will continue in perpetuity… which she has issued based on fraud… which fraud was based on prior frauds.. which she will not permit to be addressed. The Order remains a threat against any future… and a fraud which the court refuses to address or resolve.

For some reason, the documents I filed with the court clearly document the growing conspiracy and fraud. Documents which have been IGNORED by the court that continued the injustice, and which documented the abuse of power of a judiciary intent on the destruction of a man who refuses to commit suicide.

Just a note, that although Carolyn Carluccio demonstrated her complete lack of ethics or sense of humanity by fraudulently issuing court orders which left me homeless and penniless and unable survive on my own while refusing to enforce ANY court order. Carluccio persists in preventing the Appeal of her malicious and defective orders.

Carolyn Carluccio’s intent is to make sure no one else gets a look at her twisted actions on the bench. Her actions and orders solidify and reinforce the arguments presented for the appeal. The 30 or so facts that had to be submitted timely and be all inclusive.

Carolyn Carluccio IGNORED those reasons, and incorrectly wrote and filed an opinion to herself (because she hasn’t allowed it to get to the Superior Court) saying the paperwork was late. IT WASN’T. A 5 year period is permitted when extrinsic fraud is involved. Extrinsic fraud is when the fraud is intentionally meant to deny your civil rights.

Carolyn Carluccio is a constant liar and a fraud. She is corrupt.

Carolyn Carluccioe is so afraid of exposure that she rewards extortion and ethics violations IN HER COURTROOM AND ON THE RECORD. She had numerous opportunities to recuse from the case. The recusal petitions were filed and ignored. No hearings were held.

SHE WANTED TO BE EVIL. SHE WANTED TO DELIVER THE FINISHING BLOW. SHE WANTED TO SEE MY FACE WHEN I HEARD MY HOME WAS SOLD OUT FROM UNDER ME AND ALL MY POSSESSIONS WERE THROWN AWAY. SHE WANTED TO HURT ME. SHE ALSO WAS DETERMINED TO MAKE SURE I WAS DESTITUTE. Then she could ignore the petition to proceed In Forma Pauperis. BUT, she lied about neglecting to hold THAT hearing also.

While preparing the legal documents to take this to Federal Court …

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TACTICS CONTINUE.

The COMPUTER INTRUSION/CONTROL/SURVEILLANCE CONTINUES.

THE TELEPHONE INTRUSION/CONTROL/SURVEILLANCE CONTINUES.

WHY WOULD THEY STOP? WHAT IS THE INCENTIVE TO STOP?

THE TRUTH IS STILL OUT THERE HAUNTING THEM. And it’s all they left me… and they are at risk.

I’ll assume it is the private investigator who has been seen following me…. Is the PI working to cover his own liability? or Angst & Angst liability? or the Courts liability? all those corrupt judges? or the Drug Task Force’s liability? or the officer on the drug task force who was manipulated into their conspiracy.

Nothing like bullying and terrorizing the victim even after they have destroyed him.
You destroyed my career.
You destroyed my family.
You destroyed my friendships.
You stole my house and sold it illegally out from under me.
You threw away everything I owned.

You are not going to get the suicide that you tried so desperately to attain.

I get it… you will not stop terrorizing me…. I survived. The truth and hope kept me alive.

And the penalty for surviving 6 years of corruption and injustice and terror and harassment and isolation and loneliness is further terror. I am stronger than I ever imagined… and you underestimated me at every turn.

I have to sit and wonder if Rhonda Daniele, Carolyn Carluccio, Thomas Del Ricci, Emanuel Bertin, and Arthur Tilson ever get together and ask themselves WHY DID WE DID THAT TO HIM? To them it was just a job that they got caught doing wrong. They were just covering for the actions of one of their own, and for each other.

The judges were also covering for the sociopathic lawyer who had her friend the judge issue a secret order in hopes it would distract from prosecution for her advising her client to violate Federal wiretap laws. The same sociopathic lawyers would expose the judges actions and extort impunity for their client to ignore every court order.

Del Ricci calling me the paranoid computer guy over and over in proceedings, and then not providing me the copy of the secret document in May 2008. (Had Del Ricci provided that document, Tilson, Bertin, Barrett and Carluccio would have never been involved.) Instead EVERY JUDGE ON THE FAMILY COURT BENCH HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CORRUPTION.

I wasn’t ever supposed to find the documents. When I found the documents, and Angst & Angst boasted on the record of the judges active participation in the fraud and unethical ex parte conversations.

Rhonda Daniele issued that order and made it impossible for the judges to do their job. They could not recuse as a group without exposing the secret order of Rhonda Daniele. And Angst & Angst were able to leverage the secret into impunity. No matter that the Defendant was being forced to survive the inexplicable injustice and outright fraud and lies.

It must have been funny the way the judges covered it up by ignoring the law. Ignoring procedure. Ignoring their oath. THEY STOLE MY LIFE. Every passion. My very existence. Every minute of every hour of every day since May 2007. WHY? I’ve never even seen Rhonda Daniele.

---

A Note to Gabrielle Drexler… I pray they don’t persecute you. A police officer on the drug task force has so much criminal information about the tactics of law enforcement, they have the ability to leverage that information against any judge or District Attorney.
Montgomery County Courts are corrupt. And they don’t give a fuck who witnesses what they will do to destroy and humiliate an innocent person.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION – LAW
Sonya Healy : #2007-12477
v. :
Terance Healy :

PETITION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE CAROLYN CARLUCCIO

The following is an outline of the malicious actions and impact of Judge Carolyn Carluccio.

Since the case began, and was reassigned and addressed by 8 judges, there has not been a judge who went more willingly into the corruption, ethics violations and conspiracy than Judge Carluccio.
Judge Carluccio embraced her role and acted with an enthusiasm and malice completely devoid of the trust placed in her by the people of Montgomery County.

There has been no justice, no respect and no law in her courtroom.

December 2010

1. Judge Carluccio is assigned the case in early December, one month after the Recusal of Judge Stephen Barrett.
2. There are several petitions awaiting hearings. (Docket #210, #211, #214, #226, #227, #240, #241, #261)
3. Judge Carluccio receives an inappropriate ex parte communication from Angst & Angst.
4. Judge Carluccio, when presented with the lawyers ethical violation, failed to act in accordance with the Code of Judicial Ethics and becomes a party to the ethical violation.
5. Defendant petitioned the court for the ex parte document. (Docket #272) Filed as an Emergency, Judge Carluccio promptly denied the petition without explanation. (Docket #273) THERE WAS NO HEARING ON THE MATTER.
6. Defendant also petition for the ex parte documents which were exchanged with the prior judges in this matter. (Docket #271) THERE WAS NO HEARING ON THE MATTER.

January 2011

7. Judge Carluccio, during her January Short List, refuses to permit the Defendant any opportunity to address the petitions he had filed. Judge Carluccio, indicates she has no time on her schedule for hearings, and Orders hearings for June 1-2, 2011. (Docket #282 regarding #210, #211, #214, #226, #227, #240, #261) Omitted, without explanation, from the scheduling Order is #241 which is regarding ex parte communication between Angst & Angst and Judge Emanuel Bertin.

This was an intentional six month delay in the resolution of the financial and health matters, but the Judge is in control of her schedule. This scheduling tactic had been played out so many times by the Masters and Judges that it was becoming insulting that they would continue the delaying game as if the Defendant actually believed their statements. Defendant could do nothing about the Courts schedule. Every Judge has played this feigned “Sorry, there are no openings any sooner’ scheduling game.

February 2011

8. Angst & Angst file an Emergency Petition. (Docket #283)
Strangely, it is not filed electronically. All petitions filed by Angst & Angst since 2008 have been filed electronically.
9. The EMERGENCY Petition is mailed to the Prothonotary and received by the Prothonotary on February 24, 2011.

March 2011

10. The EMERGENCY Petition is not processed by the Prothonotary until March 1, 2011. A delay of one week processing an EMERGENCY Petition.
11. The corresponding Certificate of Service is filed ELECTRONICALLY on March 2, 2011. (Docket #284)
12. On March 3, 2011, Judge Carluccio grants the EMERGENCY and schedules a hearing on March 9, 2011. (Docket #285)
13. Defendant received the Petition on March 4, 2011, and the Scheduling Order on March 5, 2011.
14. This did not permit a great amount of time to prepare and file a response. That was the intent.

It is worth noting that the quick scheduling of the Petition was intentional. Angst & Angst had not filed any petition to which the Defendant could respond with a counterpetition since December 2009. Judge Bertin had ordered a Response and Counterpetition separated in August 2009. In December 2009, Judge Bertin heard the testimony and evidence regarding the petition (the re-filed counter). Judge Bertin ruled that the issues were ‘not cognizable’, offered no explanation as he could not ethically provide legal advice. Judge Bertin dismissed the petition and ordered the Defendant to pay sanctions. NOT COGNIZABLE indicated that since the issues were not directly relating to Family Court issues, the Family Court could not address them. IF HOWEVER, the counterpetition had not be re-filed as ordered by Judge Bertin, it would have been cognizable because it was connected to a Family Court Issue. The Defendant had been anticipating the opportunity to respond and counterpetition might arise again. The Defendant was able to assemble a Response and Counterpetition and file it on March 8, 2011.

15. The Defendant filed the Response and Counterpetition on March 8, 2011. (Docket #286)
16. The Response and Counterpetition documented the injustices of the Court since August 2007. The document was organized, clearly written, and included a Table Of Contents listing the major issues to be presented. It was also not a complete listing, there were more issues to be documented, however, time did not permit everything to be filed before the Emergency Hearing on March 9, 2011.
17. On March 9, 2011, Judge Carluccio was demonstrating a level of corruption, malice and fraud which could not be ignored.
18. The Hearing did not take place because as soon as Judge Carluccio was caught in several lies and intimidation tactics, she ended the proceeding and indicated it would be continued.
19. Judge Carluccio issued an Order which had nothing to do with the EMERGENCY issues before her. (Docket #287)
20. On March 10, 2011, Judge Carluccio issued an Order which wrongly paraphrased and completely misrepresented the proceeding from the day prior.
21. Judge Carluccio ordered an Equitable Distribution Hearing for March 29, 2011.

Equitable Distribution is not supposed to occur until all other petitions have been resolved. Scheduling the ED Hearing before all of the others would make them difficult to pursue. I believe this was their intent.

22. On March 16, 2011, the Defendant filed a Petition for Judge Carluccio to Recuse herself from the case. The title of the document sums the request up succinctly. PETITION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE CAROLYN TORNETTA CARLUCCIO FOR CONSPIRACY, CORRUPTION, FRAUD, INTIMIDATION, CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS / PROCEDURE AND DENIAL OF CIVIL RIGHTS. (Docket #289)
23. On March 29, 2011, Judge Carluccio denied the petition without any hearing. Judge Carluccio did not recuse or distribute an Order indicating her denial.

24. On March 29, 2011, Defendant began by asking the Court to address the issue of the June 1-2, 2011 protracted hearings.
25. The hearings had been removed from the schedule on the court website without any notice.
26. Emails/Praecipes to Court Administration had been issued and not distributed to the parties. The secret praecipes had rescheduled the hearings for March 29, 2011.
27. Judge Carluccio indicated that scheduling issue was an error. She lied.
28. Judge Carluccio reaffirmed the purpose of the March 29th proceeding was Equitable Distribution and NOT the outstanding petitions.
29. Over the course of the Equitable Distribution hearing, Defendant raised the issues relating to the outstanding petitions and was repeatedly reassured by Judge Carluccio that those hearings would occur.
30. At the end of the day, Defendant reminded Judge Carluccio about the unscheduling of the hearings where upon Judge Carluccio issued an Order scheduling the Protracted Hearings for May 5, 2011. (Docket #291)

It is interesting to note that these proceedings had been rescheduled so frequently and for multiple days. Judge Carluccio had no time on her schedule for these matters on January 10 when she pushed them out for six months. Time has been wasted on multiple proceedings where nothing has been heard or resolved. Judge Carluccio orders the 2 days of protracted hearings originally set for June 1-2, 2011 to be held in 1/2 day on May 5, 2011.

April 2011

31. On April 14, 2011, Judge Carluccio issues her next Order (Docket #294) without any proceeding, incorrectly renaming the petitions she is addressing, and ‘disposing’ of the petitions. The Order includes a footnote attributing the listing of misnamed petitions to the response/counterpetition from March 8, 2011.

32. Judge Carluccio refers to her having conducted a lengthy review of the docket, but the Divorce Clerk records indicate the judge did not have the file from the Prothonotary at the time.
33. The file being promptly returned to the Prothonotary on March 30, 2011.
34. At this point in time the docket had almost 300 entries, a review of the docket without the printed copies would have been EXTREMELY time consuming.
35. Defendant also had repeatedly indicated that the hearings had not taken place and the issues were outstanding.

Yes, the defendant does understand.

THEY DO NOT WANT TO HAVE THESE HEARINGS.

Any hearing on the matters would permit the introduction of evidence of the injustices, extrinsic fraud and the corruption of the judiciary assigned to the matter.

Judge Carluccio is revealing her active participation in the obstruction of justice.

36. Bear in mind, the Defendant has no choice but to continue to seek justice from a Court which is determined to act in an improper, unethical and corrupt manner. If the defendant fails to point out these ‘indiscretions’, Defendant might not be permitted to present them to a higher court when the time comes. The Court has acted with intent to prevent any order from being appealed. THE COURT HAS FAILED TO MAKE ANY TIMELY DECISIONS RELATING TO THE CASE.
37. On April 26, 2011, Defendant again petitions for the hearings to be scheduled. (Docket #295)
38. On April 29, 2011, Judge Carluccio DENIED that petition without any proceeding further basing her Order on an additional review of the docket. (Docket #296)

May 2011

39. On May 3, 2011, as the Judge’s April 14th order did not correctly title the petitions which she was ‘disposing’ of, Defendant stopped at the courthouse to check with Court Administration regarding the schedule for Thursday May 5, 2011. Interestingly, the court web site was still listing the hearings as scheduled. The renaming issue also could have created further confusion.
40. Court Administration contacted the Judge who indicated there were no hearings scheduled. When asked by Court Admin, the Judge refused to issue any order confirming the cancellation.
41. Defendant had the impression that the goal was for him to not show up at the hearing. The Judge would legitimately dismiss the petition for a no-show. Once Equitable Distribution has been heard, it is too late to introduce any new petitions, so the petitions could not procedurally be re-filed.
42. On May 4, 2011, Defendant received a copy of a letter from Angst & Angst to Judge Carluccio asking about the schedule for May 5, 2011. Angst & Angst had faxed it to Judge Carluccio on May 3.
That evening, Defendant checked the court web site and there was an Order issued by the Judge on May 3rd, but not docketed until May 4th. Defendant did not have a copy of this order and had not been contacted regarding the schedule.

If Defendant didn’t show up, the petitions could all be cancelled.If Defendant showed up and everyone was there for hearing(s), the tactic would be revealed. Defendant needed to be ready for nine potential hearings.If Defendant showed up and no one was there for the hearing(s), then Angst & Angst had information which Defendant did not receive.Defendant had no choice but to prepare and go to the scheduled hearing, and the Defendant did.

43. On May 5, 2011, Defendant arrived at the Courtroom 5 minutes before the time scheduled.
44. No one was there.
45. Defendant was advised by the Judge’s assistant that the hearing had been cancelled by an order on May 3rd. Defendant was then given a copy of the Order, and left.
46. On the way out of the courthouse Defendant stopped at Court Administration to update them on the last minute Cancellation Order.
47. Defendant and his mother were then surrounded by seven deputies and asked to leave the courthouse. They further indicated that ‘If I did not have business in the courthouse, I should not be there.’
48. When Defendant showed the deputies the scheduling order, they were confused at why they were mislead.
49. Court Admin confirmed the Defendant’s information to the deputies.
50. Deputies indicated they were responding to a false report from the judge that the Defendant threatened her.
The deputies have a job to do. The Defendant understands and respects that. The deputies also know the Defendant because he has been coming into the courthouse regularly since 2007. The deputies know the Defendant is not violent – Defendant is also half their size. The deputies knew they had been given bad information, however they have a job to do. At the Defendant’s suggestion, an agreement was reached. Defendant would stop and request a deputy escort me whenever he had any business in the courthouse.Deputies agreed. That is what has occurred ever since. While it is completely unnecessary, it permits the deputies to do their job responsibilities without compromising their careers. The deputies have to respond to false reports.

51. On May 9, 2011, Defendant had to return to the Prothonotary to provide a document which needed to be re-scanned. The Defendant stopped to visit the divorce file, and was informed that the sign-out sheet was no longer available and now considered an “Internal Use Only” Document.
The sign-out sheet indicates that Judge Carluccio did not have the files or any of the documents during her “lengthy” and “additional review” of the docket to which she refers in her Orders of April 14, 2011 and April 29, 2011.
52. On May 9, 2011, Defendant also docketed several documents which pertain to the case but somehow have not been docketed or have been removed from the docket.
53. On May 9, 2011, Judge Carluccio issued an Order granting a divorce to parties who had neglected to request a divorce, and ordering a malicious and cruel equitable distribution.
54. The errors in the Order prevent it being appealed on a timely basis, and would return it to Judge Carluccio’s courtroom.
55. The Defendant found the errors and petitioned for them to be resolved.
June 2011

56. Judge Carluccio delayed for months while her order made the Defendant homeless, without medical or dental benefits, and permitted the Plaintiff to vandalise and destroy the Defendant’s home (and bill the Defendant for her actions).

July 2011

57. JUDGE CARLUCCIO HAS REFUSED TO HOLD HEARINGS ON THE MATTERS.

58. At a Short List Hearing on July 18, 2011, Judge Carluccio further revealed her malice and cruelty.

59. Judge Carluccio also said out loud and on the record that the Order was indeed her Final Order, and that she no longer had jurisdiction in the case. She then went on to schedule another hearing to punish the defendant for petitioning her court to enforce court orders.

60. Judge Carluccio is currently sitting on the appeal paperwork and preventing the Appeal from being filed.

61. There is 5 years permitted for the Appeal.

62. Judge Carluccio is delaying to permit the sale of Defendant’s home which was ordered on a defective order and after committing considerable extrinsic fraud.

63. Judge Carluccio’s malice and cruelty is boundless.

SUMMARY

64. This is not the case of a sad divorcee. This is the case of a terroristic divorce.

65. A case gone horribly awry because the Plaintiff’s lawyer told her client to commit a federal crime.

66. Once discovered the case became more about the Defendant’s survival, as the lawyer manipulated everyone in a position to help into wrongful actions.

67. Then the lawyer exposed the wrongdoing, and the actions were covered up by the judiciary.

68. Judge Carolyn Carluccio has fallen into the trap which has affected the other judges.
69. Judge Carluccio has acted with clear malice and cruelty to the victim of 6 years of injustice.
70. Judge Carluccio is above the law. The judge can do whatever the judge wants.
71. That is not the justice that the US is fighting for worldwide.
72. Bring the troops home. The justice system is under attack from the very ones who have been trusted to ensure “liberty and justice for all.”
73. Through Judge Carluccio’s own words and actions she has been exposed.
74. She has disgraced the judiciary.
75. The Defendant has also asked that the following JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD Complaints be re-opened and re-investigated as they are directly related.
JCB Complaint# 2009-099 Judge Tilson
JCB Complaint # 2010-447 Judge Daniele
JCB Complaint # 2010-448 Judge Bertin
JCB Complaint # 2010-449 Judge Tilson
JCB Complaint # 2010-450 Judge Del Ricci

76. The actions of Judge Carolyn Carluccio are intended to destroy the Defendant and prevent any further reports of the injustices committed against him.
77. Since becoming a victim of Judge Rhonda Daniele’s secret order, there has been a clearly unjust ruling on EVERY petition filed.
78. As the petitions were seeking enforcement of existing Court Orders, there is no other place to turn than to the court.
79. The victim of the injustice is forced to return to a corrupt court to seek justice.
A HEARING IS REQUESTED.
Respectfully,

Terance Healy

Verification
I verify that the statements made in this document are true and correct. I inderstand that false statements herein are made subject to the Penalties of P.A. C.S. Section 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.

When the people you are supposed to turn to for help are the very people who are terrorizing and harassing you… where are you supposed to turn?

There is no incentive for them to stop terrorizing me. They won’t stop until I am dead. No one will help. Everywhere I turn I am IGNORED. Why?

The only logical explanation for the complete failure to investigate is that they are covering up the investigation of ME. WHICH FOUND NOTHING BUT SUCCEEDED IN DESTROYING MY LIFE.

They can’t/won’t admit it…. so I get a life of terror.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS EVER LOOKED AT ANY EVIDENCE AND SAID I WAS WRONG.
AND THE COURTS PREVENT TESTIMONY AND CONCEAL THEIR RESPONSIBILITY.
THEY FEAR THE TRUTH.
HELP! THEY WON’T STOP UNTIL I AM DEAD.
HELP! THEY WON’T STOP UNTIL I AM DEAD.
HELP! THEY WON’T STOP UNTIL I AM DEAD.
HELP! THEY WON’T STOP UNTIL I AM DEAD.
HELP! THEY WON’T STOP UNTIL I AM DEAD.

Level TWO of SEVEN
(Index)

The investigators/informants were mostly former, or current, drug abusers who had either been arrested for drug related offenses, or had ended up hospitalized because of their drug abuse.

The compensation they received was paid to them partly in drugs. How else could they attempt to create a drug addict unless they participated in drug use? Before arriving at my home, they always stopped at the ‘distribution point’ picked up the materials they were to provide to me… free of charge… and a little extra for themselves. Compensating a drug abuser with drugs.

It is worth pointing out that there was no way to differentiate between what was provided to the target and what was kept as a bonus for themselves.

I have pointed out numerous times that the personnel who were utilized against me were being abused. Once they realized that they were a part of something more sinister, if they tried to intervene on my behalf they would be subjected to their original jail sentence. Immediately and without benefit of any hearing. It would immediately be made clear to them that their part in this was simply to destroy a life. Any attempt by them to intervene or act responsibly would result in swift and immediate removal.

This is why Andy and Jaye disappeared after a phone call where I fabricated the story of them confessing their actions.

The story of Ron’s disappearance takes on the semblance of someone taking some sort of responsibility. Removing him from the situation and the state. Placing him in a Rehab program. These may seem to be the responsible actions of an organization that placed him in harms way. In Ron’s story, my fabricated story indicated he had become violent and attempted to beat me up. Within days of that phone conversation, he was gone. Were they acting responsibly and removing a physical threat? Possibly, but the only information about that physical threat was my conversation on my phone.

One of the methods used to determine if a party is under surveillance is to inject two truths/one lie into every conversation. When the lie is acted upon, or repeated back to you, the spy is revealed.

My reaction to the isolation after the immediate removal of people was a double edged sword. It confirmed my suspicions. It isolated me and left me alone. At times the isolation was debilitating. After these three instances, I decided it was more counter productive to my psyche, and no longer necessary, to continue this method of exposure. The evidence was clear. Coincidence could be ruled out. The facts remained.

Another quality, or experience, that most all of the agents/informants possessed was a direct connection to law enforcement personnel, or lawyers, or job experience with government contractors in the stealth surveillance market. These qualities were gleaned through simple small talk. In a situation where there was only one or two people, the similarities would have never exposed themselves. My situation was lasting for years providing plenty of time for the pattern to emerge.

- Work experience for a Government Contractor
- Work at the private investigation company
- Law School student
- Former Police Officer
- Former County Employee
- Former FBI personnel
- Former Attorney
- Child of a Police Officer, FBI, or County Employee
- Child of an Attorney

Almost ALL of these people would be placed into a situation with the knowledge that THEY TOO COULD BE DESTROYED and their families impacted should they take any action which exposes their ‘mission’. The threat of the tactics being turned to destroy them and their families was a great motivating factor. They were seeing the impact of this type of terror… AND BEING FORCED TO PARTICIPATE OR FACE THE SAME CIRCUMSTANCES.

Taking someone with a drug problem, and depositing them in this type of situation is irresponsible at such a huge level. Taking a weak person, and placing them in a situation from which they cannot help nor escape is EVIL.

AND THIS IS HOW THEY TAKE CARE OF THEIR OWN. What they do to a target who continues to persevere and hope in spite of them is unconsionable.

The things they were instructed to do will be Level 3 of this increasingly more salacious story. The epic failures.

The one thing people kept asking me was why I continued to tell people about my experience and what was happening. I had always hoped that there might be someone brave enough or with the proper connections to MAN UP against what was being done to me. When that type of bravery was presented to save someone from further servitude and likely death under this program, I offered to help. I housed that individual at my house until he could get his thoughts together and find an escape from HIS situation. He never revealed whether he was escaping from the dealers, or the confidential informant program which was causing this type of destruction to many people. His words could clearly be interpreted either way. I felt I was doing the right thing by helping in either case. I felt the go-between was acting logically and responsibly and bravely on behalf of his friend. At the same time, I feared he used up his last ‘favor’ and the affect of his actions to save his friend would make any effort on my behalf impossible. He disappeared on the day I went to local police with the documents proving the corrupt actions of Judge Rhonda Daniele. Though clearly documented and presented, the police refused to take any complaint against a sitting judge for fear of reprisal. After what was done to his father, he understood what might happen if he helped… so he disappeared.

To the friend who I dubbed “Special Agent”: I knew what you were from the beginning. I trusted you as best as I could in spite of what I learned from the trace on my computer which you used on either your first or second visit. I still have those notes which surprisingly returned your connection to “Former FBI Agents”. The blocking and filtering actions seem to have disappeared and it is no surprise that your resume includes the government contractor who let you go… and the company who had the foresight to pick you up.

UPDATE: After no word since March 2010 when he walked out my door refusing to answer any questions about his involvement… I received an email taunting me from SPECIAL AGENT RON within 24 hours of posting this article.

The longer it has gone on (and it is still ongoing), the more difficult it will be for any man to stand up for me. Yet, they won’t stop. There is no escape.

Since August 2007, I have known that the only exits are my death, or their exposure/prosecution. Everything confirms that conclusion… yet I persevere.

The Psychological Attack which was only one aspect of the terror and harassment experienced included the following:

1. Behavioral Modification:
The behavioral modification process starts with identification and qualification of the subject with additional considerations given to minimizing security risks of exposure, the subject’s suggestibility index, the subject’s intelligence and reasoning ability, moral and superstitious beliefs, and the subject’s social status and the weakness of the subject’s primary support groups (family).

They failed by underestimating my strength of character. They also failed by using the technology which I was able to detect because of a broad exposure and experience with computer and phone technology.

A.) The subject is subjected to long periods of REM Sleep Deprivation and reinforced torturing suggestions that will breakdown the subject’s will, confidence, self-reliance, and moral values. Meanwhile, the subject is increasingly isolated from their familiar and trusted peer groups causing the subject to experience depression, apathy, and ultimately social and financial failure.

I realized they were doing something to affect my sleep, I resolved to sleep when tired and to eat when hungry. While the tactic was disruptive, once I knew what was causing it I was no longer bothered by it but I lost alot of sleep.

B.) After a while, the subject has an emotional breakdown and a new support group is built around the subject.

I recognized at one point that every person I communicated with had only met me in the preceding few weeks. I could tell I was being surrounded by a new ‘group of friends’. I may have pretended to trust them, but I paid attention to EVERYTHING.

C.) Minimal security as the subject might recognize when he is not actively being observed resulting in a security concern and where it would be cost prohibitive to baby-sit the subject 24 hours a day.

D.) Behavioral modification generally occurs fastest when using negative reinforcement continuously. It is not practical or economical to watch a subject continuously to apply real time deliveries. Additionally, using multiple delivery patterns confuses the subject, causes the subject to believe they are always being watched, and maximizes behavioral change over time though continuous pressure.

The support of my new group of friends seemed to include similar vocabulary word. Certain words and phrases indicated their knowledge or involvement.

Scientific understanding and practical applications experience in the fields of psychology, hypnosis, and problem analysis are considered risks in the subject that may complicate or inhibit subsequent behavioral modification processes. Once the subject identifies the technology used it is nearly impossible to contain the potential security breach without terminating the subject.

So as I figured out their technology and reported it to the proper authorities, it required them to further manipulate law enforcement people, departments, and agencies into concealing their actions. Once again, all of them used the same approach which indicated direct involvement, or participation in the conspiracy. The more I documented in the Court and on this website, the more difficult it became for them to murder me.

THE STANDARD PROCESS

1. REM Sleep Deprivation
A subject deprived from REM Sleep has multiple symptoms i.e. reduced protein synthesis, black circles around eyes, loss of short term memory, confusion, impulsiveness, anger, frustration, diminished self-esteem, increased suggestibility, reduced productivity, apathy, and depression. Long term REM Deprivation results in death.

The Rapid Eye Movement (REM) stage of sleep is controlled and usually limited to one to two cycles per night resulting in micro-sleeps during the day. REM deprivation inhibits short-term memory, concentration, tactile abilities, verbal articulation, reasoning, and self will. Protein synthesis is inhibited and thereby reduces the subject’s ability to heal after physical damage or after periods of extensive exercise. The result is that the subject’s general health degrades as does social bonds and work/school performance.

Subjects typically complain of no sleep, restless sleep, waking up every hour on the hour, staying awake until the hour they have to get up, waking up an hour after they retire and not returning to sleep, and typically cannot recall any dreams. Additionally, they will complain of repeating torturing thoughts, racing thoughts, and facial itching and numbness. Daily fatigue, poor recall of names, and caffeine consumption is typical.

Dark rings’ surrounding the eyes is evident and the darkened area around the eyes can be reported as sore or tender by the subject. The subtle perceptual impairing effects of REM deprivation make it more difficult for the subject to identify the REM Deprivation problem.

I don’t have a temper. I also make sure I have all my facts and information gathered before I respond to anyone. I never respond to anything out of emotion or anger.

2. Transceivers (NSA):
Installation of electronic surveillance devices that collect and transmit encrypted audio, color video, and location coordinates collected at the subject site that in turn forward it to central operations.

While the devices were difficult to find, they were not difficult to detect. Once I had tangible evidence of their presence, it was not necessary to find the devices. I was not going to destroy my home and punch holes in the drywall to find their devices. The assumption that I had done so, was actually incorrectly alleged in court documents and provided further confirmation.

3. Shame Factor Enhancement:
Various suggestions are planted in the subject after a week or so long period of REM deprivation. The content of the suggestions is constructed to cause the subject to perform embarrassing and otherwise shameful acts (usually sexual but always anti-social). These shameful behaviors are used later to shame the person into a lower self esteem or reduced confidence in their own self discipline. These embarrassments provide a means to Blackmail or discredit the subject if detected and exposure is threatened by the subject.

If they were to present a video of me dancing around naked in my own home, they are only supporting my argument that they have me under surveillance.

The use of another law enforcement agency to document the behavioral discrepancy to retain anonymity, helping subjects avoid prosecution to gain loyalty, or creating an adversarial relationship between any party and the subject (another intimidation factor) – Further conceals their responsibility for creating the behavioral problem in the subject’s life.

The manipulation of the local police was an essential redirection, and the local police gladly obliged. Once manipulated they had to further excuse any crimes committed against me. Computer hacks, Cell phone hacks, Identity theft, car theft, burglary.

4. Paranoia:
Paranoia is a powerful tool. It provides a means to develop the subject’s distrust of other people including the subject’s primary group that could provide positive support during this time of distress in the subject’s life. Paranoia is often recognized and discounted as a character fault by most peoples in American society and therefore discredits the subject’s testimony even further. Uninformed, but well wishing people including friends, may recommend to the subject to pursue counseling.

It is illogical to think that seeing a counselor was going to prevent further ethical violations by a Judge. Unless the Judge was seeing the counselor.

This negative feedback can make the subject fear that people will believe the subject is crazy.

It was necessary to adopt the motto. The situation is crazy, not the man.

When the subject does seek professional counseling, the result will be a misdiagnosis with an expensive, inappropriate and ineffective treatment. The observed symptoms are not the result of biological, chemical, or environmental stresses.

The misdiagnosis strongly motivates the subject not to communicate their experiences to others to avoid social disgrace of a “schizophrenia” label and additional financial burden. This isolation of the subject and their reluctance to communicate their experience to others reduces exposure risk.

I was supposed to be embarrassed and humiliated. That was their intent. The disappearance of my children without a word was difficult. It was increasingly more humiliating as the court delayed and refused to hold preceedings. There was no explanation for their absence from my life, and from the extended family. I was forced to tell people that I had no explanation, and then see the suspicion staring back at me.

It is essential that the subject is prevented from sharing information with other subjects that have already experienced the program and thereby starting a pool of information that could be compiled and used to expose the system.

This reminds me of the night I broke through and found someone who had documented their noise on YouTube. I got an email out, but never heard back. At least she knew she was not alone.

The subject is led to believe that the subject’s neighbors, work associates and/or family are conspiring against the subject.

Further complicate the conspiracy delusion by having associates ask the subject a question or to make a comment that can be used to confirm the subjects fears. This technique further isolates the subject from trusting their peer groups, causes additional emotional distress and hostility toward these people. The distressed subject sometimes resorts to violent behavior, which is viewed by observers as irrational, unprovoked behavior that may be treated as criminal behavior by law enforcement personnel.

Where the Standard Process has not succeeded, it may become necessary to utilize the EXTREME PROCESS

EXTREME PROCESS
This method is very severe and usually results in a two to five year program. Because of the severity of the suffering, the subject is frequenty permanently impaired for integration into normal mainstream life and is essentially institutionalized.

The result is that the subject must reside in a less competitive environment.

This program basically follows the following steps; REM deprivation, breakdown of self esteem and confidence, intense suffering, exaggerated conscience, spiritual contact, battle and recovery. Whenever possible these steps will be skipped to minimize security risk and financial cost.

5. Increasing Dependence on Drugs and Alcohol:
As the REM Deprivation increases the subject must depend on Central Nervous System (CNS) Stimulants to compensate for degradation of productivity at work, school, and in interpersonal relationships. This serves in several ways. Use of drugs (especially CNS stimulants) increases the subject’s index of suggestibility. The increased stress of coping with the drugs and alcohol serves to push the subject closer to an emotional breakdown.

If the subject uses illegal drugs, attempt to set the subject up for a conviction to assure that the subject looses credibility. Who would believe a drug user that claimed that he/she was being harassed by a government agency that was tormenting them? It also serves the program by documenting something that the subject will be ashamed of when the program reaches the exaggerated conscience stage.

Alcohol, sleeping pills and other medications also inhibit REM Stage sleep and increase irritability over time thereby further degrading and isolating the subject.

In summary, the subject responds to the REM Deprivation assault with self-medication. This response discredits the subject by labeling them in society as a drug user.

It enhances the effect and it gives the subject a reason for shame that will be used against the subject later.

It should be noted that the subject is not really guilty of anything, except being a victim that was manipulated in a carefully controlled scientific behavior modification process.

6. Poor Nutrition:
The poor nutrition reduces the energy the subject has and serves later as another justification for the situation.

7. Apathy:
After the subject’s self-esteem is broken down and continuing failure and persistent suffering start to dominate every day, the individual becomes apathetic as a defense mechanism. At this stage the subject has lost the ability to persevere which is later used on the subject later to increase a feeling of guilt.

8. Depression:
Depression precipitates as a result of chronic REM Sleep Deprivation, social isolation and a feeling of helplessness in the subject. Commonly, when the subject seeks professional counseling, they are misdiagnosed and treated for depression with medications but the root cause of the problem is not treated or corrected.

9. Insecurity:
The subject starts to experience severe insecurity in this stage. The insecurity is executed in several ways.
- Because of the impaired reasoning ability and emotional isolation, the subject is susceptible to the approaches of insincere people, which are used to emotionally hurt the subject more. This convinces the subject that people can’t be trusted. This serves to isolate the subject from supportive peer groups and makes the subject emotionally dependent on insincere people who gain more power in the subject’s life.

10. Journals and Diaries:
Most of the subjects are directed to keep a “Journal” or diary so that the subject can record and review feelings, events, observations that normally would be unavailable due to short term memory loss during extended periods of REM Deprivation. The Subject’s Journals can be used in a variety of ways.

11. Degrading Spelling and Grammatical Performance:
Subjects in these prolonged stages of REM deprivation, confusion, and emotional distress, have very poor grammar, spelling, and short attention spans.

12. Slowed Speech:
Subjects experience slower speech and require greater time articulating concise points as a result of the REM Deprivation and other performance degrading posthypnotic commands. Very slight alcohol consumption can exasperate the damage of REM Deprivation and precipitate slurred speech.

13. Confusion:
Confusion results from REM Sleep Deprivation and the emotional damage and stress that is being inflicted. The confusion continuously inflicts damage to the subject’s life without real-time observation. A confused person generally is not as productive as an organized clear thinker is and has a greater potential to offend people by what they say or do and is less likely to recognize when they have made mistakes. All of these symptoms assist in this stage and subsequent stages.

In addition, the confusion restricts the individual from analyzing the source of their suffering and taking corrective actions, and therefore reduces the exposure risk.

14. Poor Concentration:
Difficulty concentrating impairs the subject’s productivity and restrains the subject from making self-improvements and corrections in behavior. It makes it very difficult for the subject to do any research or reading to evaluate his/her condition. This paves the way to demonstrate that the subject cannot do anything on their own, thereby increasing the frustration and anxiety of the subject (inducing emotional breakdown) and ultimately making the subject totally dependant.

15. Loose Association and Personality Disorders:
The subject experiences disjointed thought at this stage (Loose Association) that appears to observers as a strange sense of humor or inappropriate responses when engaging in conversations. Ongoing sarcasm and other negative attitudes and undesirable personality traits can be present.

16. Anger:
The way that the subject experiences anger is of profound importance. If the subject redirects the increasing anger and hostilities toward another person in the form of violence (misplaced aggression), this will result in reinforcement of the violent behavior with posthypnotic commands.

Typically, the Subject misplaces the aggression to commit acts of violence with spouses, friends, or employers resulting in further social isolation and increased shame.

17. Delusions:
Delusions are used to discredit the witness and also provide an additional source for fear, intimidation and confusion. Delusions can be but are not limited to the Subject developing conspiracy theories.

18. Audio Hallucinations:
Subjects often report hearing walls clicking, footsteps in the house, the sound of someone trying to open the door, drilling at the door, etc. These audio hallucinations are also used to discredit the witness and also provide an additional source for paranoia, fear, and negative reinforcement.

21. Tinnitus (Ear Ringing):
Tinnitus is commonly reported by subjects being harassed and typically has no pharmacological or biochemical basis. It is often misdiagnosed as ringing caused by excessive aspirin use however it is caused by concealed devices.

22. Complete Quiet Silence:
Used to induce confusion, the subject has the tinnitus removed to indicate that he has survived/succeeded, reached a milestone towards beiong released, or reimplemented to remind the subject that there is no escape. After such long periods of ‘noise’ the subject becomes unsettled as he experiences the silence. Once he has adapted to that ‘loss’, the reintroduction of the noise has immediate and dramatic impact on the subjects state of mind.

********************************************

Reverse engineering of the technology to prove it’s abuses is quite difficult. Even if you have a company sweep and clear your home, the devices can be deactivated (hidden) and re-activated or reintroduced later.

In my case I have succesfully and tangibly proven the devices, equipment, personnel and activities used against me and have documented it on this web site. It was not easy to survive. In hindsight, I sincerely would prefer not to have survived. It was hard enough what they were doing to me, but watching it destroy my extended family multiplied the emotional impact.

These psychological tactics were only one aspect of the terror I have experienced.

The intrusion/surveillance/remote control of computers and phones provided filtering and screening of ALL outside contact and prevented effective communication.

The extreme injustice, bias and fraud from a court initially manipulated to issuing a Secret Court Order, which was further used for extortion by the Plaintiff to guarantee impunity with regard to following ANY court order. The Plaintiff’s failure to follow ANY court order required additional litigation requesting the enforcement of the Court’s Orders.

The continuing exposure and litigation of the injustice, the bias, the fraud, the ex parte communications, the complete failure to uphold any ethical standard, or Judicial integrity resulted in malicious, retaliatory and vindictive issuance of Orders and Opinions by the court which further demonstrate the fraud, collusion and extreme abuse of power in seeking to further punish the victim for documenting the unethical and criminal actions of the Court.